World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
43
Citations
8783
World Ranking
7913
National Ranking
3412

Xiaojun Lin publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Xiaojun Lin sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 161 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Xiaojun Lin D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Xiaojun Lin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to scheduling and control of wireless networks

Overview

Xiaojun Lin is affiliated with Purdue University West Lafayette in the United States. Their primary research contributions are situated within the fields of Computer Science and Engineering, with a focus on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, and Computer Networks and Communications. They have also contributed to subfields such as Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Management Science and Operations Research.

The scientist's work has addressed various topics including Electric Power System Optimization, Smart Grid Energy Management, Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure, Cloud Computing and Resource Management, Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research, Optimization and Search Problems, and Data Stream Mining Techniques.

Among the venues where Xiaojun Lin has published are arXiv (Cornell University), IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, IEEE Transactions on Networking, IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering, and IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

Recent published papers include:

  • Time-of-Use Pricing for Energy Storage Investment, 2021, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid
  • SLearn: A Case for Task Sampling Based Learning for Cluster Job Scheduling, 2022, IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing
  • Engineering cell membrane-camouflaged COF-based nanosatellite for enhanced tumor-targeted photothermal chemoimmunotherapy, 2024, Biomaterials
  • Integrated Online Learning and Adaptive Control in Queueing Systems with Uncertain Payoffs, 2021, Operations Research
  • Competitive Online Convex Optimization With Switching Costs and Ramp Constraints, 2021, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Xiaojun Lin include Lei Jiao, Jiaming Xu, Dongwei Zhao, Hao Wang, and Jianwei Huang.

In recognition of contributions to scheduling and control of wireless networks, Xiaojun Lin was named an IEEE Fellow in 2017.

Best Publications

  • A tutorial on cross-layer optimization in wireless networks

    Xiaojun Lin;N.B. Shroff;R. Srikant

  • Joint rate control and scheduling in multihop wireless networks

    Xiaojun Lin;N.B. Shroff

  • The impact of imperfect scheduling on cross-layer rate control in wireless networks

    Xiaojun Lin;N.B. Shroff

  • The impact of imperfect scheduling on cross-layer congestion control in wireless networks

    Xiaojun Lin;Ness B. Shroff

  • Understanding the capacity region of the Greedy maximal scheduling algorithm in multihop wireless networks

    Changhee Joo;Xiaojun Lin;Ness B. Shroff

  • Constant-Time Distributed Scheduling Policies for Ad Hoc Wireless Networks

    Xiaojun Lin;S.B. Rasool

  • Coded Caching Under Arbitrary Popularity Distributions

    Jinbei Zhang;Xiaojun Lin;Xinbing Wang

  • Utility maximization for communication networks with multipath routing

    Xiaojun Lin;N.B. Shroff

  • A Distributed Joint Channel-Assignment, Scheduling and Routing Algorithm for Multi-Channel Ad-hoc Wireless Networks

    Xiaojun Lin;S. Rasool

  • Understanding the Capacity Region of the Greedy Maximal Scheduling Algorithm in Multi-Hop Wireless Networks

    Changhee Joo;Xiaojun Lin;N.B. Shroff

  • Low-complexity distributed scheduling algorithms for wireless networks

    Abhinav Gupta;Xiaojun Lin;R. Srikant

  • Minimizing delay and maximizing lifetime for wireless sensor networks with anycast

    Joohwan Kim;Xiaojun Lin;Ness B. Shroff;Prasun Sinha

  • Degenerate delay-capacity tradeoffs in ad-hoc networks with Brownian mobility

    Xiaojun Lin;Gaurav Sharma;Ravi R. Mazumdar;Ness B. Shroff

  • Virtual Energy Storage Sharing and Capacity Allocation

    Dongwei Zhao;Hao Wang;Jianwei Huang;Xiaojun Lin

  • Proactive Demand Response for Data Centers: A Win-Win Solution

    Hao Wang;Jianwei Huang;Xiaojun Lin;Hamed Mohsenian-Rad

  • Optimal anycast technique for delay-sensitive energy-constrained asynchronous sensor networks

    Joohwan Kim;Xiaojun Lin;Ness B. Shroff

  • Low-Complexity Distributed Scheduling Algorithms for Wireless Networks

    A. Gupta;Xiaojun Lin;R. Srikant

  • Online energy generation scheduling for microgrids with intermittent energy sources and co-generation

    Lian Lu;Jinlong Tu;Chi-Kin Chau;Minghua Chen

  • Asymptotically optimal power-aware routing for multihop wireless networks with renewable energy sources

    L. Lin;N.B. Shroff;R. Srikant

  • Exploring smart grid and data center interactions for electric power load balancing

    Hao Wang;Jianwei Huang;Xiaojun Lin;Hamed Mohsenian-Rad

  • Utility Maximization for Communication Networks

    Xiaojun Lin;Ness B. Shroff

Frequent Co-Authors

Ness B. Shroff
Ness B. Shroff The Ohio State University
Minghua Chen
Minghua Chen City University of Hong Kong
Jianwei Huang
Jianwei Huang Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen
Xinbing Wang
Xinbing Wang Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Changhee Joo
Changhee Joo Korea University
Mung Chiang
Mung Chiang Purdue University West Lafayette
Saurabh Bagchi
Saurabh Bagchi Purdue University West Lafayette
Chuan Wu
Chuan Wu University of Hong Kong
R. Srikant
R. Srikant University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Sonia Fahmy
Sonia Fahmy Purdue University West Lafayette

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Computer Science degree in the USA opens doors to several related fields that offer strong career prospects and flexible learning options. Many students choose to complement or expand their tech skillsets with online degrees in high-demand disciplines.

For those interested in law and security, the best online criminal justice degree programs provide an accessible path into roles in cybersecurity, forensics, and law enforcement. If you’re drawn to data, business, or finance, pursuing the best online accounting degree can blend your tech background with financial expertise.

Graduate-level learners may also consider the cheapest masters in data science to develop advanced skills in analytics, big data, and AI. Alternatively, if you’re interested in the built environment, an online construction management program offers a technology-driven approach to overseeing major projects.

Each of these online pathways supports diverse career opportunities and can be pursued alongside or after your Computer Science studies. Research your options to find the best fit for your goals and interests.

Best Scientists Citing Xiaojun Lin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles