World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
64
Citations
18555
World Ranking
1846
National Ranking
56

Wolf M. Mooij publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wolf M. Mooij sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 178 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Wolf M. Mooij D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wolf M. Mooij sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Wolf M. Mooij is affiliated with Wageningen University & Research in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with a substantial body of work related to aquatic ecosystems and nutrient dynamics.

The scientist's main fields of study include:

  • Environmental Science

Subfields of their work cover:

  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Oceanography
  • Ecology

Wolf M. Mooij has contributed to various topics, notably:

  • Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Marine and Coastal Ecosystems
  • Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Ecosystem Dynamics and Resilience
  • Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation

Their recent papers demonstrate engagement with diverse aspects of environmental and ecosystem research. Notable publications include:

  • Exploring desirable nature futures for Nationaal Park Hollandse Duinen, 2022, Ecosystems and People
  • Learning from generations of sustainability concepts, 2020, Environmental Research Letters
  • Regime shifts in shallow lakes explained by critical turbidity, 2023, Water Research
  • Will legal international rhino horn trade save wild rhino populations?, 2020, Global Ecology and Conservation
  • Smart Nutrient Retention Networks: a novel approach for nutrient conservation through water quality management, 2021, Inland Waters

Wolf M. Mooij frequently collaborates with a range of co-authors, including:

  • Dianneke van Wijk
  • Sven Teurlincx
  • Annette B.G. Janssen
  • Lilith Kramer
  • Manqi Chang

Their work has been published in various academic venues, with repeated contributions to:

  • Water Research
  • Ecological Modelling
  • Ecosystems and People
  • Environmental Research Letters
  • Global Ecology and Conservation

Best Publications

  • A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models

    Volker Grimm;Uta Berger;Finn Bastiansen;Sigrunn Eliassen

  • Pattern-oriented modeling of agent-based complex systems: lessons from ecology

    Volker Grimm;Eloy Revilla;Uta Berger;Florian Jeltsch

  • Beyond the Plankton Ecology Group (PEG) Model : Mechanisms Driving Plankton Succession

    Ulrich Sommer;Rita Adrian;Lisette N. de Senerpont Domis;James J. Elser

  • Individual-based modeling of ecological and evolutionary processes

    Donald L. DeAngelis;Wolf M. Mooij

  • The impact of climate change on lakes in the Netherlands: a review

    Wolf M. Mooij;Stephan Hülsmann;Lisette N. De Senerpont Domis;Bart A. Nolet

  • Plankton dynamics under different climatic conditions in space and time

    Lisette N. De Senerpont Domis;James J. Elser;Alena S. Gsell;Vera L. M. Huszar

  • Challenges and opportunities for integrating lake ecosystem modelling approaches

    Wolf M. Mooij;Dennis Trolle;Erik Jeppesen;George Arhonditsis

  • Experimental evidence for spatial self-organization and its emergent effects in mussel bed ecosystems.

    Johan van de Koppel;Joanna C. Gascoigne;Guy Theraulaz;Max Rietkerk

  • Detritus-Dependent Development of the Microbial Community in an Experimental System: Qualitative Analysis by Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis

    Erik J. van Hannen;Wolf Mooij;Miranda P. van Agterveld;Herman J. Gons

  • Predicting the effect of climate change on temperate shallow lakes with the ecosystem model PCLake

    W. M. Mooij;J. H. Janse;L. N. De Senerpont Domis;S. Hülsmann

  • Allelopathic inhibition of phytoplankton by exudates from Stratiotes aloides

    G. Mulderij;W.M. Mooij;A.J.P. Smolders;E. Van Donk

  • Inducible defences and the paradox of enrichment

    Matthijs Vos;Bob W. Kooi;Donald L. DeAngelis;Wolf M. Mooij

  • Pattern formation at multiple spatial scales drives the resilience of mussel bed ecosystems

    Quan-Xing Liu;Peter M. J. Herman;Wolf M. Mooij;Jef Huisman

  • Estimating the critical phosphorus loading of shallow lakes with the ecosystem model PCLake: Sensitivity, calibration and uncertainty

    J.H. Janse;M. Scheffer;L. Lijklema;L. Van Liere

  • Creating a safe operating space for wetlands in a changing climate

    Andy J Green;Paloma Alcorlo;Edwin Thm Peeters;Edward P Morris;Edward P Morris

  • Response of submerged macrophyte communities to external and internal restoration measures in north temperate shallow lakes.

    Sabine Hilt;Marta M. Alirangues Nuñez;Elisabeth S. Bakker;Irmgard Blindow

  • Modeling lakes and reservoirs in the climate system

    M. D. MacKay;P. J. Neale;C. D. Arp;L. N. De Senerpont Domis

  • Critical phosphorus loading of different types of shallow lakes and the consequences for management estimated with the ecosystem model PCLake

    Jan H. Janse;Lisette N. De Senerpont Domis;Marten Scheffer;Lambertus Lijklema

  • Hydrological regulation drives regime shifts: evidence from paleolimnology and ecosystem modeling of a large shallow Chinese lake

    Xiangzhen Kong;Qishuang He;Bin Yang;Wei He

  • Tube-dwelling invertebrates: tiny ecosystem engineers have large effects in lake ecosystems

    Franz Hölker;Michael J. Vanni;Jan J. Kuiper;Christof Meile

  • Alternative stable states in large shallow lakes

    Annette B.G. Janssen;Sven Teurlincx;Shuqing An;Jan H. Janse

  • Climate-induced shifts in an experimental phytoplankton community: a mechanistic approach

    Lisette N. De Senerpont Domis;Wolf M. Mooij;Jef Huisman

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan H. Janse
Jan H. Janse Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
Donald L. DeAngelis
Donald L. DeAngelis United States Geological Survey
Erik Jeppesen
Erik Jeppesen Aarhus University
Marten Scheffer
Marten Scheffer Wageningen University & Research
Ellen Van Donk
Ellen Van Donk Utrecht University
Egbert H. van Nes
Egbert H. van Nes Wageningen University & Research
Stephan Hülsmann
Stephan Hülsmann Sächsisches Staatsministerium für Umwelt und Landwirtschaft
Dennis Trolle
Dennis Trolle Aarhus University
Maarten Boersma
Maarten Boersma Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Arthur H. W. Beusen
Arthur H. W. Beusen Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Ecology and Evolution, online degrees and flexible career pathways can offer unique opportunities to expand their qualifications. Many are choosing non-traditional routes that make it possible to balance education with work or other commitments.

For those in healthcare, the move to advanced roles can start with programs like the fastest rn to bsn program, designed for registered nurses seeking a bachelor's degree in under a year. Other nurses may consider adn to np programs, which offer a seamless path from an associate degree to a nurse practitioner role, opening doors to leadership and specialized positions.

Even individuals without a nursing background can explore the world of healthcare with online msn programs for non nurses, enabling rapid entry into advanced practice areas. When evaluating online programs, it's crucial to consider accreditation. A comparison such as capella university nursing accreditation can help you understand program credibility and industry recognition.

Whether pursuing ecology, evolution, or related health fields, these pathways show how innovative online learning can support career advancement while meeting diverse educational needs.

Best Scientists Citing Wolf M. Mooij

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles