World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
44
Citations
6361
World Ranking
5138
National Ranking
137

Jan H. Janse publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan H. Janse sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 95 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Jan H. Janse D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan H. Janse sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Drivers of Wetland Conversion: a Global Meta-Analysis

    Sanneke van Asselen;Peter H. Verburg;Jan E. Vermaat;Jan H. Janse

  • Challenges and opportunities for integrating lake ecosystem modelling approaches

    Wolf M. Mooij;Dennis Trolle;Erik Jeppesen;George Arhonditsis

  • Global trends and scenarios for terrestrial biodiversity and ecosystem services from 1900 to 2050

    Unknown

  • Predicting the effect of climate change on temperate shallow lakes with the ecosystem model PCLake

    W. M. Mooij;J. H. Janse;L. N. De Senerpont Domis;S. Hülsmann

  • Quantifying the effect of catchment land use and water nutrient concentrations on freshwater river and stream biodiversity

    M. J. Weijters;J. H. Janse;R. Alkemade;J. T. A. Verhoeven

  • Estimating the critical phosphorus loading of shallow lakes with the ecosystem model PCLake: Sensitivity, calibration and uncertainty

    J.H. Janse;M. Scheffer;L. Lijklema;L. Van Liere

  • Response of submerged macrophyte communities to external and internal restoration measures in north temperate shallow lakes.

    Sabine Hilt;Marta M. Alirangues Nuñez;Elisabeth S. Bakker;Irmgard Blindow

  • Safeguarding freshwater life beyond 2020 : recommendations for the new global biodiversity framework from the European experience

    Charles B. van Rees;Kerry A. Waylen;Astrid Schmidt-Kloiber;Stephen J. Thackeray

  • Critical phosphorus loading of different types of shallow lakes and the consequences for management estimated with the ecosystem model PCLake

    Jan H. Janse;Lisette N. De Senerpont Domis;Marten Scheffer;Lambertus Lijklema

  • Hydrological regulation drives regime shifts: evidence from paleolimnology and ecosystem modeling of a large shallow Chinese lake

    Xiangzhen Kong;Qishuang He;Bin Yang;Wei He

  • Alternative stable states in large shallow lakes

    Annette B.G. Janssen;Sven Teurlincx;Shuqing An;Jan H. Janse

  • Food-web stability signals critical transitions in temperate shallow lakes.

    Jan J. Kuiper;Cassandra van Altena;Peter C. de Ruiter;Peter C. de Ruiter;Luuk P. A. van Gerven

  • Spatial identification of critical nutrient loads of large shallow lakes: Implications for Lake Taihu (China)

    Annette B.G. Janssen;Victor C.L. de Jager;Jan H. Janse;Xiangzhen Kong

  • Exploring, exploiting and evolving diversity of aquatic ecosystem models : a community perspective

    Annette B G Janssen;George B. Arhonditsis;Arthur Beusen;Karsten Bolding

  • A community-based framework for aquatic ecosystem models

    Dennis Trolle;David P. Hamilton;Matthew R. Hipsey;Karsten Bolding

  • Towards a global model for wetlands ecosystem services

    Jan H. Janse;Anne A. van Dam;Edwin M.A. Hes;Jeroen J.M. de Klein

  • GLOBIO-Aquatic, a global model of human impact on the biodiversity of inland aquatic ecosystems

    J.H. Janse;J.J. Kuiper;M.J. Weijters;E.P. Westerbeek

  • A model of nutrient dynamics in shallow lakes in relation to multiple stable states

    Unknown

  • A system of metrics for the assessment and improvement of aquatic ecosystem models

    Matthew R. Hipsey;Gideon Gal;George B. Arhonditsis;Cayelan C. Carey

  • Pathways for agriculture and forestry to contribute to terrestrial biodiversity conservation : A global scenario-study

    Marcel T.J. Kok;Rob Alkemade;Rob Alkemade;Michel Bakkenes;Martha van Eerdt

Frequent Co-Authors

Wolf M. Mooij
Wolf M. Mooij Wageningen University & Research
Rob Alkemade
Rob Alkemade Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
Aafke M. Schipper
Aafke M. Schipper Radboud University
Erik Jeppesen
Erik Jeppesen Aarhus University
Dennis Trolle
Dennis Trolle Aarhus University
Arthur H. W. Beusen
Arthur H. W. Beusen Utrecht University
Piero Visconti
Piero Visconti International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
Sabine Hilt
Sabine Hilt Leibniz Association
Shinichiro Fujimori
Shinichiro Fujimori Kyoto University
Detlef P. van Vuuren
Detlef P. van Vuuren Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jan H. Janse