| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | Current World Ranking | National Ranking | Current National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 74 | 2120 | 1936 | 188 | 179 | 264 | 19152 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Wojciech Danysz between 1983 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Wojciech Danysz published across 43 years, from 1983 to 2025, averaging 6.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2005. 6 of the 287 publications appeared in the last two years.
287 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1983 | 4 |
| 1984 | 2 |
| 1985 | 4 |
| 1986 | 13 |
| 1987 | 4 |
| 1988 | 9 |
| 1989 | 5 |
| 1990 | 4 |
| 1991 | 5 |
| 1992 | 4 |
| 1993 | 3 |
| 1994 | 5 |
| 1995 | 15 |
| 1996 | 7 |
| 1997 | 12 |
| 1998 | 16 |
| 1999 | 16 |
| 2000 | 16 |
| 2001 | 5 |
| 2002 | 9 |
| 2003 | 4 |
| 2004 | 6 |
| 2005 | 23 |
| 2006 | 18 |
| 2007 | 10 |
| 2008 | 9 |
| 2009 | 12 |
| 2010 | 7 |
| 2011 | 9 |
| 2012 | 5 |
| 2013 | 4 |
| 2014 | 1 |
| 2015 | 4 |
| 2016 | 1 |
| 2017 | 2 |
| 2018 | 4 |
| 2019 | 1 |
| 2020 | 0 |
| 2021 | 3 |
| 2022 | 0 |
| 2023 | 0 |
| 2024 | 4 |
| 2025 | 2 |
| Total | 287 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wojciech Danysz sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 264 publications — 77th percentile
77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 38–47 | 18 | |
| 48–57 | 79 | |
| 58–67 | 193 | |
| 68–77 | 323 | |
| 78–87 | 406 | |
| 88–97 | 452 | |
| 98–107 | 539 | |
| 108–117 | 505 | |
| 118–127 | 522 | |
| 128–137 | 469 | |
| 138–147 | 456 | |
| 148–157 | 459 | |
| 158–167 | 397 | |
| 168–177 | 383 | |
| 178–187 | 350 | |
| 188–197 | 302 | |
| 198–207 | 306 | |
| 208–217 | 262 | |
| 218–227 | 242 | |
| 228–237 | 220 | |
| 238–247 | 203 | |
| 248–257 | 174 | |
| 258–267 | 176 | 264 |
| 268–277 | 175 | |
| 278–287 | 125 | |
| 288–297 | 116 | |
| 298–307 | 127 | |
| 308–317 | 128 | |
| 318–327 | 99 | |
| 328–337 | 89 | |
| 338–347 | 78 | |
| 348–357 | 96 | |
| 358–367 | 66 | |
| 368–377 | 59 | |
| 378–387 | 65 | |
| 388–397 | 54 | |
| 398–407 | 48 | |
| 408–417 | 49 | |
| 418–427 | 34 | |
| 428–437 | 31 | |
| 438–447 | 30 | |
| 448–457 | 31 | |
| 458–467 | 36 | |
| 468–477 | 40 | |
| 478–487 | 35 | |
| 488–497 | 30 | |
| 498–507 | 23 | |
| 508–517 | 26 | |
| 518–527 | 20 | |
| 528–537 | 23 | |
| 538–547 | 20 | |
| 548–557 | 20 | |
| 558–567 | 17 | |
| 568–577 | 14 | |
| 578–587 | 20 | |
| 588–597 | 20 | |
| 598–607 | 19 | |
| 608–617 | 18 | |
| 618–627 | 17 | |
| 628–637 | 11 | |
| 638–647 | 11 | |
| 648–657 | 11 | |
| 658–667 | 8 | |
| 668–677 | 7 | |
| 678–687 | 11 | |
| 688–697 | 10 | |
| 698–707 | 4 | |
| 708–717 | 6 | |
| 718–727 | 5 | |
| 728–737 | 5 | |
| 738–747 | 9 | |
| 748–757 | 9 | |
| 758–767 | 3 | |
| 768–777 | 7 | |
| 778–787 | 7 | |
| 788–797 | 6 | |
| 798–807 | 2 | |
| 808–817 | 2 | |
| 818–827 | 7 | |
| 828–837 | 0 | |
| 838–847 | 9 | |
| 848–857 | 3 | |
| 858–867 | 1 | |
| 868–877 | 3 | |
| 878–886 | 6 | |
| 887+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wojciech Danysz sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 74 D-Index — 79th percentile
79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30–31 | 42 | |
| 32–33 | 172 | |
| 34–35 | 296 | |
| 36–37 | 435 | |
| 38–39 | 459 | |
| 40–41 | 456 | |
| 42–43 | 467 | |
| 44–45 | 478 | |
| 46–47 | 512 | |
| 48–49 | 435 | |
| 50–51 | 425 | |
| 52–53 | 418 | |
| 54–55 | 392 | |
| 56–57 | 357 | |
| 58–59 | 334 | |
| 60–61 | 328 | |
| 62–63 | 260 | |
| 64–65 | 278 | |
| 66–67 | 239 | |
| 68–69 | 250 | |
| 70–71 | 210 | |
| 72–73 | 200 | |
| 74–75 | 189 | 74 |
| 76–77 | 170 | |
| 78–79 | 146 | |
| 80–81 | 113 | |
| 82–83 | 126 | |
| 84–85 | 100 | |
| 86–87 | 84 | |
| 88–89 | 99 | |
| 90–91 | 84 | |
| 92–93 | 85 | |
| 94–95 | 72 | |
| 96–97 | 76 | |
| 98–99 | 45 | |
| 100–101 | 49 | |
| 102–103 | 43 | |
| 104–105 | 32 | |
| 106–107 | 45 | |
| 108–109 | 50 | |
| 110–111 | 32 | |
| 112–113 | 39 | |
| 114–115 | 32 | |
| 116–117 | 29 | |
| 118–119 | 27 | |
| 120–121 | 19 | |
| 122–123 | 23 | |
| 124–125 | 27 | |
| 126–127 | 16 | |
| 128–129 | 24 | |
| 130–131 | 13 | |
| 132–133 | 21 | |
| 134–135 | 17 | |
| 136–137 | 14 | |
| 138–139 | 15 | |
| 140–141 | 10 | |
| 142–143 | 10 | |
| 144–145 | 13 | |
| 146–147 | 9 | |
| 148–149 | 8 | |
| 150–151 | 6 | |
| 152–153 | 6 | |
| 154–155 | 7 | |
| 156–157 | 7 | |
| 158–159 | 10 | |
| 160–161 | 4 | |
| 162 | 8 | |
| 163+ | 100 |
C.G. Parsons;W. Danysz;G. Quack
Wojciech Danysz;Chris G. Parsons
Chris G. Parsons;Albrecht Stöffler;Wojciech Danysz
Wojciech Danysz;Chris G Parsons
C G Parsons;W Danysz;G Quack
Wojciech Danysz;Chris G. Parsons
W. Danysz;C.G. Parsons;J. Kornhuber;W.J. Schmidt
C.G. Parsons;G. Quack;I. Bresink;L. Baran
Chris G. Parsons;Wojciech Danysz;Andrzej Dekundy;Irena Pulte
Flora Mela;Matteo Marti;Andrzej Dekundy;Wojciech Danysz
W. Danysz;J.T. Wroblewski;E. Costa
Andrzej Dekundy;Martin Lundblad;Wojciech Danysz;M. Angela Cenci
J T Wroblewski;W Danysz
Danysz W;Zajaczkowski W;Parsons Cg
Parsons Cg;Danysz W;Quack G;Hartmann S
Zofia Rogóż;Grażyna Skuza;Jerzy Maj;Wojciech Danysz
I.V. Belozertseva;T. Kos;P. Popik;W. Danysz
G. Rammes;W. Danysz;C. G. Parsons
Daniella Rylander;Alessandra Recchia;Flora Mela;Andrzej Dekundy
E. Fadda;W. Danysz;J.T. Wroblewski;E. Costa
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.