World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Wojciech Danysz

Wojciech Danysz

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
74
Citations
19152
World Ranking
2120
National Ranking
188

Wojciech Danysz publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wojciech Danysz sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 264 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Wojciech Danysz D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wojciech Danysz sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Memantine is a clinically well tolerated N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist—a review of preclinical data

    C.G. Parsons;W. Danysz;G. Quack

  • Glycine and N-Methyl-d-Aspartate Receptors: Physiological Significance and Possible Therapeutic Applications

    Wojciech Danysz;Chris G. Parsons

  • Memantine: a NMDA receptor antagonist that improves memory by restoration of homeostasis in the glutamatergic system--too little activation is bad, too much is even worse.

    Chris G. Parsons;Albrecht Stöffler;Wojciech Danysz

  • Alzheimer's disease, β-amyloid, glutamate, NMDA receptors and memantine – searching for the connections

    Wojciech Danysz;Chris G Parsons

  • Glutamate in CNS disorders as a target for drug development: an update.

    C G Parsons;W Danysz;G Quack

  • The NMDA Receptor Antagonist Memantine as a Symptomatological and Neuroprotective Treatment for Alzheimer's Disease: Preclinical Evidence

    Wojciech Danysz;Chris G. Parsons

  • Aminoadamantanes as NMDA receptor antagonists and antiparkinsonian agents : Preclinical studies

    W. Danysz;C.G. Parsons;J. Kornhuber;W.J. Schmidt

  • Comparison of the potency, kinetics and voltage-dependency of a series of uncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonists in vitro with anticonvulsive and motor impairment activity in vivo

    C.G. Parsons;G. Quack;I. Bresink;L. Baran

  • Memantine and cholinesterase inhibitors: complementary mechanisms in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.

    Chris G. Parsons;Wojciech Danysz;Andrzej Dekundy;Irena Pulte

  • Antagonism of metabotropic glutamate receptor type 5 attenuates l-DOPA-induced dyskinesia and its molecular and neurochemical correlates in a rat model of Parkinson's disease.

    Flora Mela;Matteo Marti;Andrzej Dekundy;Wojciech Danysz

  • Learning impairment in rats by N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists

    W. Danysz;J.T. Wroblewski;E. Costa

  • Modulation of l-DOPA-induced abnormal involuntary movements by clinically tested compounds: Further validation of the rat dyskinesia model

    Andrzej Dekundy;Martin Lundblad;Wojciech Danysz;M. Angela Cenci

  • Modulation of glutamate receptors: molecular mechanisms and functional implications.

    J T Wroblewski;W Danysz

  • Modulation of learning processes by ionotropic glutamate receptor ligands.

    Danysz W;Zajaczkowski W;Parsons Cg

  • Novel systemically active antagonists of the glycine site of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor: electrophysiological, biochemical and behavioral characterization.

    Parsons Cg;Danysz W;Quack G;Hartmann S

  • Synergistic effect of uncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonists and antidepressant drugs in the forced swimming test in rats.

    Zofia Rogóż;Grażyna Skuza;Jerzy Maj;Wojciech Danysz

  • Antidepressant-like effects of mGluR1 and mGluR5 antagonists in the rat forced swim and the mouse tail suspension tests.

    I.V. Belozertseva;T. Kos;P. Popik;W. Danysz

  • Pharmacodynamics of Memantine: An Update

    G. Rammes;W. Danysz;C. G. Parsons

  • Pharmacological Modulation of Glutamate Transmission in a Rat Model of l-DOPA-Induced Dyskinesia: Effects on Motor Behavior and Striatal Nuclear Signaling

    Daniella Rylander;Alessandra Recchia;Flora Mela;Andrzej Dekundy

  • Glycine and D-serine increase the affinity of N-methyl-D-aspartate sensitive glutamate binding sites in rat brain synaptic membranes.

    E. Fadda;W. Danysz;J.T. Wroblewski;E. Costa

Frequent Co-Authors

Tanja Weil
Tanja Weil Max Planck Society
Piotr Popik
Piotr Popik Polish Academy of Sciences
Gary L. Wenk
Gary L. Wenk The Ohio State University
Werner J. Schmidt
Werner J. Schmidt University of Tübingen
Leszek Kaczmarek
Leszek Kaczmarek Instytut Biologii Doświadczalnej im. Marcelego Nenckiego
Rainer Spanagel
Rainer Spanagel Heidelberg University
M. Angela Cenci
M. Angela Cenci Lund University
Adam Bisaga
Adam Bisaga Columbia University
Michal Hetman
Michal Hetman University of Louisville
Richard W. Foltin
Richard W. Foltin Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Wojciech Danysz

Recently Published Articles