| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering | 44 | 1586 | 616 | 166 | 9468 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Werner Goldsmith between 1952 and 2005, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Werner Goldsmith published across 54 years, from 1952 to 2005, averaging 3.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 1974. 3 of the 178 publications appeared in the last two years.
178 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1952 | 1 |
| 1953 | 1 |
| 1954 | 1 |
| 1955 | 2 |
| 1956 | 2 |
| 1957 | 2 |
| 1958 | 0 |
| 1959 | 0 |
| 1960 | 2 |
| 1961 | 1 |
| 1962 | 0 |
| 1963 | 4 |
| 1964 | 3 |
| 1965 | 2 |
| 1966 | 3 |
| 1967 | 1 |
| 1968 | 4 |
| 1969 | 7 |
| 1970 | 2 |
| 1971 | 2 |
| 1972 | 6 |
| 1973 | 3 |
| 1974 | 10 |
| 1975 | 2 |
| 1976 | 7 |
| 1977 | 3 |
| 1978 | 2 |
| 1979 | 7 |
| 1980 | 4 |
| 1981 | 3 |
| 1982 | 8 |
| 1983 | 6 |
| 1984 | 5 |
| 1985 | 2 |
| 1986 | 3 |
| 1987 | 7 |
| 1988 | 6 |
| 1989 | 2 |
| 1990 | 5 |
| 1991 | 4 |
| 1992 | 8 |
| 1993 | 2 |
| 1994 | 1 |
| 1995 | 5 |
| 1996 | 6 |
| 1997 | 2 |
| 1998 | 0 |
| 1999 | 3 |
| 2000 | 1 |
| 2001 | 3 |
| 2002 | 4 |
| 2003 | 5 |
| 2004 | 1 |
| 2005 | 2 |
| Total | 178 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Werner Goldsmith sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 166 publications — 31st percentile
31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 47–56 | 10 | |
| 57–66 | 23 | |
| 67–76 | 32 | |
| 77–86 | 62 | |
| 87–96 | 67 | |
| 97–106 | 91 | |
| 107–116 | 113 | |
| 117–126 | 115 | |
| 127–136 | 130 | |
| 137–146 | 140 | |
| 147–156 | 155 | |
| 157–166 | 132 | 166 |
| 167–176 | 133 | |
| 177–186 | 130 | |
| 187–196 | 140 | |
| 197–206 | 115 | |
| 207–216 | 125 | |
| 217–226 | 117 | |
| 227–236 | 99 | |
| 237–246 | 92 | |
| 247–256 | 100 | |
| 257–266 | 95 | |
| 267–276 | 88 | |
| 277–286 | 77 | |
| 287–296 | 74 | |
| 297–306 | 74 | |
| 307–316 | 62 | |
| 317–326 | 70 | |
| 327–336 | 59 | |
| 337–346 | 58 | |
| 347–356 | 45 | |
| 357–366 | 44 | |
| 367–376 | 36 | |
| 377–386 | 41 | |
| 387–396 | 32 | |
| 397–406 | 23 | |
| 407–416 | 28 | |
| 417–426 | 27 | |
| 427–436 | 25 | |
| 437–446 | 23 | |
| 447–456 | 23 | |
| 457–466 | 20 | |
| 467–476 | 12 | |
| 477–486 | 24 | |
| 487–496 | 18 | |
| 497–506 | 12 | |
| 507–516 | 13 | |
| 517–526 | 21 | |
| 527–536 | 12 | |
| 537–546 | 8 | |
| 547–556 | 16 | |
| 557–566 | 3 | |
| 567–576 | 11 | |
| 577–586 | 6 | |
| 587–596 | 5 | |
| 597–606 | 6 | |
| 607–616 | 7 | |
| 617–626 | 7 | |
| 627–636 | 10 | |
| 637–646 | 4 | |
| 647–656 | 3 | |
| 657–658 | 2 | |
| 659+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Werner Goldsmith sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 44 D-Index — 54th percentile
54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30 | 83 | |
| 31 | 113 | |
| 32 | 144 | |
| 33 | 153 | |
| 34 | 189 | |
| 35 | 158 | |
| 36 | 139 | |
| 37 | 127 | |
| 38 | 130 | |
| 39 | 126 | |
| 40 | 104 | |
| 41 | 100 | |
| 42 | 107 | |
| 43 | 101 | |
| 44 | 103 | 44 |
| 45 | 79 | |
| 46 | 88 | |
| 47 | 70 | |
| 48 | 83 | |
| 49 | 44 | |
| 50 | 64 | |
| 51 | 56 | |
| 52 | 50 | |
| 53 | 48 | |
| 54 | 58 | |
| 55 | 52 | |
| 56 | 48 | |
| 57 | 42 | |
| 58 | 34 | |
| 59 | 42 | |
| 60 | 37 | |
| 61 | 42 | |
| 62 | 44 | |
| 63 | 22 | |
| 64 | 33 | |
| 65 | 29 | |
| 66 | 23 | |
| 67 | 29 | |
| 68 | 24 | |
| 69 | 19 | |
| 70 | 34 | |
| 71 | 26 | |
| 72 | 19 | |
| 73 | 18 | |
| 74 | 19 | |
| 75 | 14 | |
| 76 | 19 | |
| 77 | 8 | |
| 78 | 18 | |
| 79 | 16 | |
| 80 | 12 | |
| 81 | 17 | |
| 82 | 11 | |
| 83 | 16 | |
| 84 | 7 | |
| 85 | 9 | |
| 86 | 8 | |
| 87 | 6 | |
| 88 | 6 | |
| 89 | 7 | |
| 90 | 10 | |
| 91 | 4 | |
| 92 | 4 | |
| 93+ | 100 |
Werner Goldsmith was affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley in the United States during their academic career.
Their recognized achievement includes being named a Fellow of the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation in 1953.
Goldsmith's work did not list specific recent papers, co-authors, or publication venues, and no detailed information is available regarding their main or subfields of study or specific research topics.
There are no records of book publications or detailed research outputs provided in the available data.
The scientist's contributions are identified within the academic context of their affiliation and the known award, indicating an active presence in their field during their career. They are deceased, and this profile reflects information documented from their active years.
Unknown
Raymond M. Brach;Werner Goldsmith
Werner Goldsmith
Zhu Guoqi;Werner Goldsmith;Ck.H. Dharan
Werner Goldsmith;Jerome L. Sackman
Kenneth L. Monson;Werner Goldsmith;Nicholas M. Barbaro;Geoffrey T. Manley
Y.-C. Deng;W. Goldsmith
Joseph Radin;Werner Goldsmith
Zhu Guoqi;Werner Goldsmith;C.K.H. Dharan
W. Goldsmith;J.L. Sackman;C. Ewerts
Werner Goldsmith;John Plunkett
Robert P. Banaugh;Werner Goldsmith
Kenneth L. Monson;Kenneth L. Monson;Werner Goldsmith;Nicholas M. Barbaro;Geoffrey T. Manley
C.A. Calder;W. Goldsmith
Werner Goldsmith;C.K.H. Dharan;Hui Chang
B. Landkof;W. Goldsmith
Werner Goldsmith;Stephen A. Finnegan
Liying Zhang;Jinho Bae;Warren N. Hardy;Kenneth L. Monson
Paul Lubock;Werner Goldsmith
W. Goldsmith;M. Polivka;T. Yang
Werner Goldsmith
Theodore Merrill;Werner Goldsmith;Y.C. Deng
Benjamin Landkof;Werner Goldsmith;J.L. Sackman
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
Exploring alternatives to Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering can open doors to diverse career paths. For those interested in the therapeutic and counseling side of engineering-focused problem solving, understanding the different types of therapist degrees can help identify suitable online programs that complement technical skills.
If time is a constraint, some students prefer the fastest and easiest counseling degree programs. These accelerated options allow for quicker entry into specialized roles without compromising foundational knowledge, making them appealing for professionals seeking career shifts or upskilling.
Additionally, programs like the bcba accelerated program provide focused study paths that combine behavioral analysis with engineering principles. Such interdisciplinary programs can expand career prospects in areas like human factors engineering or systems optimization.
Prospective students should also consider admission challenges. Understanding is it hard to get into slp grad school offers valuable insights on acceptance rates and prerequisites, which can parallel many competitive engineering and applied science programs, helping applicants prepare effectively.
