World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
44
Citations
9468
World Ranking
1586
National Ranking
616

Werner Goldsmith publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Werner Goldsmith sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 166 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Werner Goldsmith D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Werner Goldsmith sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1953 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation

Overview

Werner Goldsmith was affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley in the United States during their academic career.

Their recognized achievement includes being named a Fellow of the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation in 1953.

Goldsmith's work did not list specific recent papers, co-authors, or publication venues, and no detailed information is available regarding their main or subfields of study or specific research topics.

There are no records of book publications or detailed research outputs provided in the available data.

The scientist's contributions are identified within the academic context of their affiliation and the known award, indicating an active presence in their field during their career. They are deceased, and this profile reflects information documented from their active years.

Best Publications

  • The mechanics of penetration of projectiles into targets

    Unknown

  • Mechanical Impact Dynamics: Rigid Body Collisions

    Raymond M. Brach;Werner Goldsmith

  • Non-ideal projectile impact on targets

    Werner Goldsmith

  • Penetration of laminated Kevlar by projectiles. I : Experimental investigation

    Zhu Guoqi;Werner Goldsmith;Ck.H. Dharan

  • An experimental study of energy absorption in impact on sandwich plates.

    Werner Goldsmith;Jerome L. Sackman

  • Axial Mechanical Properties of Fresh Human Cerebral Blood Vessels

    Kenneth L. Monson;Werner Goldsmith;Nicholas M. Barbaro;Geoffrey T. Manley

  • Response of a human head/neck/upper-torso replica to dynamic loading--II. Analytical/numerical model.

    Y.-C. Deng;W. Goldsmith

  • Normal projectile penetration and perforation of layered targets

    Joseph Radin;Werner Goldsmith

  • Penetration of laminated Kevlar by projectiles—II. Analytical model

    Zhu Guoqi;Werner Goldsmith;C.K.H. Dharan

  • Static and dynamic fracture strength of Barre granite

    W. Goldsmith;J.L. Sackman;C. Ewerts

  • A biomechanical analysis of the causes of traumatic brain injury in infants and children.

    Werner Goldsmith;John Plunkett

  • Diffraction of Steady Acoustic Waves by Surfaces of Arbitrary Shape

    Robert P. Banaugh;Werner Goldsmith

  • Significance of source and size in the mechanical response of human cerebral blood vessels

    Kenneth L. Monson;Kenneth L. Monson;Werner Goldsmith;Nicholas M. Barbaro;Geoffrey T. Manley

  • Plastic deformation and perforation of thin plates resulting from projectile impact

    C.A. Calder;W. Goldsmith

  • Quasi-static and ballistic perforation of carbon fiber laminates

    Werner Goldsmith;C.K.H. Dharan;Hui Chang

  • Petalling of thin, metallic plates during penetration by cylindro-conical projectiles

    B. Landkof;W. Goldsmith

  • Normal and Oblique Impact of Cylindro-Conical and Cylindrical Projectiles on Metallic Plates

    Werner Goldsmith;Stephen A. Finnegan

  • Computational study of the contribution of the vasculature on the dynamic response of the brain.

    Liying Zhang;Jinho Bae;Warren N. Hardy;Kenneth L. Monson

  • Experimental cavitation studies in a model head-neck system

    Paul Lubock;Werner Goldsmith

  • DYNAMIC BEHAVIOR OF CONCRETE.

    W. Goldsmith;M. Polivka;T. Yang

  • The state of head injury biomechanics: past, present, and future: part 1.

    Werner Goldsmith

  • Three-dimensional response of a lumped parameter head-neck model due to impact and impulsive loading.

    Theodore Merrill;Werner Goldsmith;Y.C. Deng

  • Impact on a head-neck structure

    Benjamin Landkof;Werner Goldsmith;J.L. Sackman

Frequent Co-Authors

James M. Kelly
James M. Kelly University of California, Berkeley
Geoffrey T. Manley
Geoffrey T. Manley University of California, San Francisco
Nicholas M. Barbaro
Nicholas M. Barbaro The University of Texas at Austin
Jack Lewis
Jack Lewis University of Cambridge
Vitali F. Nesterenko
Vitali F. Nesterenko University of California, San Diego
King H. Yang
King H. Yang Wayne State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternatives to Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering can open doors to diverse career paths. For those interested in the therapeutic and counseling side of engineering-focused problem solving, understanding the different types of therapist degrees can help identify suitable online programs that complement technical skills.

If time is a constraint, some students prefer the fastest and easiest counseling degree programs. These accelerated options allow for quicker entry into specialized roles without compromising foundational knowledge, making them appealing for professionals seeking career shifts or upskilling.

Additionally, programs like the bcba accelerated program provide focused study paths that combine behavioral analysis with engineering principles. Such interdisciplinary programs can expand career prospects in areas like human factors engineering or systems optimization.

Prospective students should also consider admission challenges. Understanding is it hard to get into slp grad school offers valuable insights on acceptance rates and prerequisites, which can parallel many competitive engineering and applied science programs, helping applicants prepare effectively.

Best Scientists Citing Werner Goldsmith

Recently Published Articles