What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Macroeconomics
- Microeconomics
- Statistics
His primary areas of study are Mathematical economics, Productivity, Index, Monetary economics and Törnqvist index.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Degrees of freedom, Time series and Duality in addition to Mathematical economics.
In general Productivity, his work in Total factor productivity and Productivity change is often linked to Remainder and Input/output linking many areas of study.
As part of one scientific family, Walter Diewert deals mainly with the area of Index, narrowing it down to issues related to the Statistics, and often Industrial production index.
His Monetary economics research incorporates elements of Capital, Cost of capital, Investment and Foreign direct investment.
His Törnqvist index research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Malmquist index, Productivity model, Econometrics and Partial productivity.
His most cited work include:
- THE ECONOMIC THEORY OF INDEX NUMBERS AND THE MEASUREMENT OF INPUT, OUTPUT, AND PRODUCTIVITY (2530 citations)
- Exact and superlative index numbers (1748 citations)
- Superlative Index Numbers and Consistency in Aggregation (399 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His scientific interests lie mostly in Econometrics, Index, Mathematical economics, Price index and Productivity.
His work on Hedonic regression as part of general Econometrics study is frequently connected to Context, therefore bridging the gap between diverse disciplines of science and establishing a new relationship between them.
His study in the fields of Cost-of-living index under the domain of Index overlaps with other disciplines such as Superlative.
His work in Mathematical economics incorporates the disciplines of Type and Function.
His work deals with themes such as Value, Consumer price index, Price level and National accounts, which intersect with Price index.
His Productivity study improves the overall literature in Macroeconomics.
He most often published in these fields:
- Econometrics (34.04%)
- Index (26.24%)
- Mathematical economics (17.02%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2012-2017)?
- Econometrics (34.04%)
- Index (26.24%)
- Price index (17.73%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Econometrics, Index, Price index, Total factor productivity and Productivity.
His Econometrics study combines topics in areas such as Real estate investment trust, Value, Depreciation and National accounts.
His work often combines Index and Superlative studies.
The various areas that Walter Diewert examines in his Price index study include Substitution bias and Consumer price index.
Walter Diewert interconnects Private sector and Public economics in the investigation of issues within Total factor productivity.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Business sector and Technical progress.
Between 2012 and 2017, his most popular works were:
- Capital and the Theory of Productivity Measurement (102 citations)
- Residential Property Price Indexes for Tokyo (11 citations)
- Commercial Property Price Indexes and the System of National Accounts (5 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Macroeconomics
- Microeconomics
- Statistics
His primary areas of study are Econometrics, Price index, Hedonic regression, Value and Balance sheet.
His research on Price index frequently connects to adjacent areas such as Index.
His studies deal with areas such as Discounted cash flow and Consumer price index as well as Index.
The concepts of his Hedonic regression study are interwoven with issues in Real estate and Collinearity.
Walter Diewert has researched Balance sheet in several fields, including Multifactor productivity, Depreciation and National accounts.
His National accounts study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Real estate investment trust and Asset.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
