World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Economics and Finance 43 1958 234 186 8665

Charles Blackorby publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Charles Blackorby between 1970 and 2013, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Charles Blackorby published across 44 years, from 1970 to 2013, averaging 4.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 1996. 1 of the 191 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2013. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 1996. 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 1 publication 1975: 3 publications 1976: 2 publications 1977: 5 publications 1978: 4 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 3 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 5 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 6 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 5 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 9 publications 1991: 8 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 11 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 24 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 12 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 1 publication
1970 2013

191 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Charles Blackorby: publications per year, 1970 to 2013
Year Publications
1970 1
1971 0
1972 0
1973 1
1974 1
1975 3
1976 2
1977 5
1978 4
1979 1
1980 3
1981 2
1982 5
1983 1
1984 6
1985 1
1986 2
1987 1
1988 5
1989 2
1990 9
1991 8
1992 3
1993 11
1994 8
1995 6
1996 24
1997 9
1998 3
1999 12
2000 3
2001 4
2002 5
2003 3
2004 7
2005 12
2006 3
2007 8
2008 3
2009 3
2010 0
2011 0
2012 0
2013 1
Total 191
Download as CSV

Charles Blackorby publications per year - data summary

  • Charles Blackorby, a Economics and Finance scholar from University of Warwick, has 191 publications recorded across 44 years, from 1970 to 2013.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1970 and the most recent to 2013.
  • The most productive year is 1996, with 24 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1970, 1973, 1974, 1979 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 5 of the 44 years in the span carry no publications at all (1971, 1972, 2010, 2011 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 4.3 papers per year over the whole span, or 4.9 per year counting only the 39 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2009-2013) hold 4 publications, 2% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1970-1984: 35 publications (2.3 per year); 1985-1999: 104 publications (6.9 per year); 2000-2013: 52 publications (3.7 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Charles Blackorby publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles Blackorby sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 42–46 to 521+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 111. Most scientists, 111, have 137–141 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 182–186 publications, is where this scientist sits. 42–46 publications: 1 scientist 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42–46 publications 521+

This scientist: 186 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Economics and Finance scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,760 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
42–46 1
47–51 12
52–56 7
57–61 23
62–66 32
67–71 36
72–76 56
77–81 57
82–86 70
87–91 86
92–96 72
97–101 106
102–106 97
107–111 96
112–116 101
117–121 103
122–126 102
127–131 108
132–136 107
137–141 111
142–146 94
147–151 96
152–156 100
157–161 74
162–166 68
167–171 91
172–176 76
177–181 75
182–186 61 186
187–191 66
192–196 68
197–201 71
202–206 60
207–211 56
212–216 44
217–221 51
222–226 65
227–231 48
232–236 59
237–241 37
242–246 37
247–251 41
252–256 43
257–261 33
262–266 34
267–271 39
272–276 25
277–281 29
282–286 29
287–291 26
292–296 31
297–301 31
302–306 24
307–311 28
312–316 24
317–321 13
322–326 14
327–331 25
332–336 18
337–341 16
342–346 18
347–351 15
352–356 17
357–361 19
362–366 16
367–371 17
372–376 7
377–381 18
382–386 13
387–391 19
392–396 9
397–401 10
402–406 13
407–411 13
412–416 5
417–421 10
422–426 6
427–431 12
432–436 9
437–441 9
442–446 10
447–451 12
452–456 8
457–461 4
462–466 7
467–471 4
472–476 5
477–481 6
482–486 7
487–491 8
492–496 5
497–501 4
502–506 4
507–511 5
512–516 7
517–520 7
521+ 99
Download as CSV

Charles Blackorby publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,760 Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 42–46 to 521+ publications.
  • Charles Blackorby, a Economics and Finance scholar from University of Warwick, records 186 publications - the 56th percentile of the discipline.
  • 56% of ranked Economics and Finance scientists score the same or lower than Charles Blackorby, and about 44% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 167–171 publications range, and Charles Blackorby ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 137–141 publications, holding 111 scientists (3% of the field).
  • 48% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 162–166 publications), so the distribution leans towards the lower end of the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 521 publications or more, 99 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Charles Blackorby D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles Blackorby sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 72 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 101+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 178. Most scientists, 178, have 33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Economics and Finance scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,760 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 126
31 147
32 157
33 178
34 171
35 141
36 132
37 129
38 130
39 120
40 117
41 113
42 114
43 97 43
44 115
45 86
46 78
47 83
48 62
49 74
50 50
51 66
52 69
53 55
54 67
55 61
56 62
57 45
58 34
59 47
60 46
61 36
62 37
63 56
64 50
65 32
66 28
67 30
68 24
69 25
70 22
71 21
72 26
73 24
74 23
75 12
76 14
77 15
78 15
79 17
80 17
81 11
82 10
83 16
84 11
85 5
86 9
87 13
88 9
89 7
90 6
91 4
92 8
93 10
94 11
95 6
96 4
97 4
98 6
99 6
100 8
101+ 100
Download as CSV

Charles Blackorby D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,760 Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 72 ranges running from 30 to 101+ D-Index.
  • Charles Blackorby, a Economics and Finance scholar from University of Warwick, records 43 D-Index - the 50th percentile of the discipline.
  • 50% of ranked Economics and Finance scientists score the same or lower than Charles Blackorby, and about 50% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 44 D-Index range, and Charles Blackorby ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 33 D-Index, holding 178 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1988 - Fellows of the Econometric Society

Overview

Charles Blackorby is affiliated with the University of Warwick in the United Kingdom. Their academic work is connected to this institution, where they contribute to research and scholarship.

In 1988, Charles Blackorby was recognized as a Fellow of the Econometric Society, an award that marks a formal acknowledgment by a professional organization in the field of econometrics.

There are no listed recent papers, co-authors, book publications, main or subfields of study, main topics of work, or publication venues associated with Charles Blackorby in the available data.

Best Publications

  • Will the Real Elasticity of Substitution Please Stand Up? (A Comparison of the Allen/Uzawa and Morishima Elasticities)

    Charles Blackorby;R Robert Russell

  • Population issues in social choice theory, welfare economics and ethics

    Charles Blackorby;Walter Bossert;David J. Donaldson

  • Measures of relative equality and their meaning in terms of social welfare

    Charles Blackorby;David Donaldson

  • Cash versus Kind, Self-selection, and Efficient Transfers

    Charles Blackorby;David Donaldson

  • Social criteria for evaluating population change

    Charles Blackorby;David Donaldson

  • A Theoretical Treatment of Indices of Absolute Inequality

    Charles Blackorby;David Donaldson

  • ETHICAL INDICES FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF POVERTY

    Charles Blackorby;David Donaldson

  • Intertemporal population ethics: critical-level utilitarian principles.

    Charles Blackorby;Walter Bossert;David Donaldson

  • Social Choice with Interpersonal Utility Comparisons: A Diagrammatic Introduction

    Charles Blackorby;David Donaldson;John A. Weymark

  • On testing separability restrictions with flexible functional forms

    Charles Blackorby;Daniel Primont;R.Robert Russell

  • Adult-equivalence scales and the economic implementation of interpersonal comparisons of well-being*

    Charles Blackorby;David Donaldson

  • The Morishima Elasticity of Substitution; Symmetry, Constancy, Separability, and its Relationship to the Hicks and Allen Elasticities

    Charles Blackorby;R. Robert Russell

  • A New Procedure for the Measurement of Inequality within and among Population Subgroups

    Charles Blackorby;David Donaldson;Maria Auersperg

  • Utilitarianism and the Theory of Justice

    Charles Blackorby;Walter Bossert;David Donaldson

  • A review article: The case against the use of the sum of compensating variations in cost-benefit analysis

    Charles Blackorby;David Donaldson

  • Ratio-Scale and Translation-Scale Full Interpersonal Comparability without Domain Restrictions: Admissible Social-Evaluation Functions

    Charles Blackorby;David Donaldson

  • Money metric utility: A harmless normalization?

    Charles Blackorby;David Donaldson

  • Taxes and Employment Subsidies in Optimal Redistribution Programs

    Paul Beaudry;Charles Blackorby;Dezsoe Szalay

  • ESTIMATION OF DEMAND SYSTEMS GENERATED BY THE GORMAN POLAR FORM; A GENERALIZATION OF THE S-BRANCH UTILITY TREE1

    Charles Blackorby;Richard Boyce;R. Robert Russell

  • Critical-Level Utilitarianism and the Population-Ethics Dilemma

    Charles Blackorby;Walter Bossert;David Donaldson

  • Consistent Intertemporal Decision Making

    Charles Blackorby;David Nissen;Daniel Primont;R. Robert Russell

Frequent Co-Authors

David Donaldson
David Donaldson University of British Columbia
Walter Bossert
Walter Bossert University of Montreal
Anthony F. Shorrocks
Anthony F. Shorrocks Global Economic Perspectives
Russell Davidson
Russell Davidson McGill University
John A. Weymark
John A. Weymark Vanderbilt University
Paul Beaudry
Paul Beaudry University of British Columbia
Anthony J. Venables
Anthony J. Venables University of Manchester
C. A. Knox Lovell
C. A. Knox Lovell University of Queensland
Marc Fleurbaey
Marc Fleurbaey Paris School of Economics
Marie C. Thursby
Marie C. Thursby Georgia Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students and professionals interested in Economics and Finance, several online degree pathways can boost career prospects and provide specialized knowledge. Many choose the mba in entrepreneurship online to blend core business skills with innovative thinking—ideal for those aiming to lead new ventures or startups in financial sectors.

A project management degree is also highly relevant. This credential equips graduates with skills needed to oversee large-scale economic projects, manage budgets, and lead diverse teams—all crucial abilities within finance and business administration.

If you want to fast-track your career, consider an accelerated finance degree. These programs allow learners to quickly gain in-depth financial expertise, preparing them for roles in investment, banking, and financial analysis.

For those looking to move swiftly up the corporate ladder, a fast track mba 6 months online offers a comprehensive business education in an extremely condensed format, helping you develop leadership and analytical skills quickly.

Each of these online degrees provides unique opportunities to tailor your education to your professional goals, making the field of Economics and Finance in the USA both flexible and future-focused.

Best Scientists Citing Charles Blackorby

Recently Published Articles