World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
32
Citations
5384
World Ranking
10813
National Ranking
5654

Tom Luster publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tom Luster sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 64 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Tom Luster D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tom Luster sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tom Luster is affiliated with Michigan State University in the United States. Their academic profile reflects involvement in research activities associated with this institution.

There are no recorded recent papers available in the data to detail specific research outputs, titles, or publication venues related to their work. Likewise, no frequent co-authors have been identified, which may indicate collaboration has either not been prominent or not documented in the current source data.

Information regarding frequent publication venues, book publications, main fields of study, subfields, and main research topics connected to Tom Luster is also not present. This absence means that a detailed outline of their specialized research areas or thematic focus cannot be provided within this profile.

Similarly, no awards or distinctions have been listed in connection with Tom Luster, and there is no indication of the scientist being deceased.

Best Publications

  • Adolescent Sexual Activity: An Ecological, Risk-Factor Approach.

    Stephen A. Small;Tom Luster

  • Factors associated with sexual risk-taking behaviors among adolescents.

    Tom Luster;Stephen A. Small

  • The Relation between Parental Values and Parenting Behavior: A Test of the Kohn Hypothesis.

    Tom Luster;Kelly Rhoades;Bruce Haas

  • Adjustment of children born to teenage mothers: The contribution of risk and protective factors.

    Eric F. Dubow;Tom Luster

  • Factors Related to the Quality of the Home Environment and Children's Achievement:

    Rozumah Baharudin;Tom Luster

  • An Ecological, Risk-Factor Examination of Adolescents' Sexual Activity in Three Ethnic Groups

    Daniel F. Perkins;Tom Luster;Francisco A. Villarruel;Stephen Small

  • Family and child influences on educational attainment: A secondary analysis of the high/scope Perry Preschool data.

    Tom Luster;Harriette Pipes McAdoo

  • Factors Related to the Achievement and Adjustment of Young African American Children.

    Tom Luster;Harriette Pipes McAdoo

  • Factors Related to Parenting Practices in Taiwan.

    Fu-Mei Chen;Tom Luster

  • Sexual Abuse History and Problems in Adolescence: Exploring the Effects of Moderating Variables.

    Tom Luster;Stephen A. Small

  • Sexual Abuse History and Number of Sex Partners Among Female Adolescents

    Tom Luster;Stephen A. Small

  • Sudanese refugee youth in foster care: the "lost boys" in America.

    Laura Bates;Diane Baird;Deborah J. Johnson;Robert E. Lee

  • Developmental Processes in African American Families: An Application of McLoyd’s Theoretical Model

    M. Angela Nievar;Tom Luster

  • Successful adaptation among Sudanese unaccompanied minors: Perspectives of youth and foster parents.

    Tom Luster;Desiree Qin;Laura Bates;Meenal Rana

  • Interaction between parents and children

    Tom Luster;Laura Stafford;Cherie L. Bayer

  • The Lost Boys of Sudan: coping with ambiguous loss and separation from parents.

    Tom Luster;Desiree Qin;Laura Bates;Deborah Johnson

  • The Lost Boys of Sudan: Ambiguous Loss, Search for Family, and Reestablishing Relationships With Family Members*

    Tom Luster;Desiree B. Qin;Laura Bates;Deborah J. Johnson

  • Home Environment and Maternal Intelligence as Predictors of Verbal Intelligence: A Comparison of Preschool and School-Age Children.

    Tom Luster;Eric Dubow

  • Factors related to successful outcomes among preschool children born to low-income adolescent mothers.

    Tom Luster;Laura Bates;Hiram Fitzgerald;Marcia Vandenbelt

  • Predictors of the quality of the home environment that adolescent mothers provide for their school-aged children.

    Tom Luster;Eric Dubow

  • The Handbook of Parenting (Volume 2): Biology and Ecology of Parenting

    Tom Luster;Marc H. Bornstein

Frequent Co-Authors

Hiram E. Fitzgerald
Hiram E. Fitzgerald Michigan State University
Eric F. Dubow
Eric F. Dubow Bowling Green State University
Daniel F. Perkins
Daniel F. Perkins Pennsylvania State University
Marc H. Bornstein
Marc H. Bornstein National Institutes of Health
Michael Rutter
Michael Rutter King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Psychology opens up a range of online degree options and specialized pathways, particularly in counseling. Students interested in maximizing their education investment can review rankings for most valuable counseling degree programs ranking in Pennsylvania, which highlight programs offering strong outcomes and value for aspiring professionals.

Location can play a key role in determining the best program fit. For those considering urban environments, the best value counseling degrees in Philadelphia offer opportunities to connect with diverse communities and clinical experiences. Similarly, students in the Pacific Northwest can review the most valuable counseling programs in Seattle to identify reputable online and hybrid programs well-suited to the local job market.

Texas also stands out with the best value counseling degrees in Texas, providing flexible options for distance learners aiming to make a difference in fast-growing regions. Exploring these rankings will help you make informed decisions about online degrees and future career paths in psychology and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Tom Luster

Recently Published Articles