World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
38
Citations
12351
World Ranking
9964
National Ranking
4192

Thomas Karagiannis publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Karagiannis sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 78 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Thomas Karagiannis D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Karagiannis sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas Karagiannis is a researcher affiliated with Microsoft in the United States. Their primary field of study is Medicine, with a specific focus on Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism. They have contributed extensively to topics related to diabetes treatment, management, and metabolic research.

Karagiannis's research topics include:

  • Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Diabetes Management and Research
  • Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
  • Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Diet and metabolism studies
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Their work has been published in several key journals, frequently including:

  • Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
  • Annals of Internal Medicine
  • Diabetologia
  • Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
  • HORMONES

Among recent publications authored or co-authored by Thomas Karagiannis are:

  • Management of type 2 diabetes with the dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist tirzepatide: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 2022, Diabetologia
  • GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors for older people with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis, 2021, Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice

Additional papers related to this research area, although authored by collaborators, contribute context to the field of study:

  • Comparative Effectiveness of Glucose-Lowering Drugs for Type 2 Diabetes, 2020, Annals of Internal Medicine
  • Comparative efficacy of glucose-lowering medications on body weight and blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and network meta-analysis, 2021, Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
  • Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors as combination therapy for type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis, 2020, Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism

Thomas Karagiannis frequently collaborates with researchers such as Απόστολος Τσάπας, Eleni Bekiari, Aris Liakos, Ioannis Avgerinos, and Konstantinos Malandris, who have contributed significantly to the domains of endocrinology and diabetes.

Best Publications

  • BLINC: multilevel traffic classification in the dark

    Thomas Karagiannis;Konstantina Papagiannaki;Michalis Faloutsos

  • Transport layer identification of P2P traffic

    Thomas Karagiannis;Andre Broido;Michalis Faloutsos;Kc claffy

  • Towards predictable datacenter networks

    Hitesh Ballani;Paolo Costa;Thomas Karagiannis;Ant Rowstron

  • Power Law and Exponential Decay of Intercontact Times between Mobile Devices

    T Karagiannis;J.-Y. Le Boudec;Milan Vojnović

  • Is P2P dying or just hiding? [P2P traffic measurement]

    T. Karagiannis;A. Broido;N. Brownlee;K.C. Claffy

  • Power law and exponential decay of inter contact times between mobile devices

    Thomas Karagiannis;Jean-Yves Le Boudec;Milan Vojnović

  • Better never than late: meeting deadlines in datacenter networks

    Christo Wilson;Hitesh Ballani;Thomas Karagiannis;Ant Rowtron

  • A nonstationary Poisson view of Internet traffic

    T. Karagiannis;M. Molle;M. Faloutsos;A. Broido

  • Should internet service providers fear peer-assisted content distribution?

    Thomas Karagiannis;Pablo Rodriguez;Konstantina Papagiannaki

  • Long-range dependence ten years of Internet traffic modeling

    T. Karagiannis;M. Molle;M. Faloutsos

  • Decentralized task-aware scheduling for data center networks

    Fahad R. Dogar;Thomas Karagiannis;Hitesh Ballani;Antony Rowstron

  • IOFlow: a software-defined storage architecture

    Eno Thereska;Hitesh Ballani;Greg O'Shea;Thomas Karagiannis

  • Planet scale software updates

    Christos Gkantsidis;Thomas Karagiannis;Milan VojnoviC

  • Chatty tenants and the cloud network sharing problem

    Hitesh Ballani;Keon Jang;Thomas Karagiannis;Changhoon Kim

  • Bridging the tenant-provider gap in cloud services

    Virajith Jalaparti;Hitesh Ballani;Paolo Costa;Thomas Karagiannis

  • File-sharing in the Internet: A characterization of P2P traffic in the backbone

    Thomas Karagiannis;Andre Broido;Nevil Brownlee;KC Claffy

  • we.b: the web of short urls

    Demetris Antoniades;Iasonas Polakis;Georgios Kontaxis;Elias Athanasopoulos

  • Rise of the planet of the apps: a systematic study of the mobile app ecosystem

    Thanasis Petsas;Antonis Papadogiannakis;Michalis Polychronakis;Evangelos P. Markatos

  • Offering network performance guarantees in multi-tenant datacenters

    Hitesh Ballani;Paolo Costa;Thomas Karagiannis;Antony Rowstron

  • A user-friendly self-similarity analysis tool

    Thomas Karagiannis;Michalis Faloutsos;Mart Molle

Frequent Co-Authors

Hitesh Ballani
Hitesh Ballani Microsoft (United States)
Christos Gkantsidis
Christos Gkantsidis Microsoft (United States)
Michalis Faloutsos
Michalis Faloutsos University of California, Riverside
Antony Rowstron
Antony Rowstron Microsoft (United States)
Milan Vojnovic
Milan Vojnovic London School of Economics and Political Science
Peter Key
Peter Key Microsoft (United States)
Paolo Costa
Paolo Costa Microsoft (United States)
Evangelos P. Markatos
Evangelos P. Markatos University of Crete
Konstantina Papagiannaki
Konstantina Papagiannaki Google (United States)
Alexandre Proutiere
Alexandre Proutiere Royal Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Advancing your education in computer science can open many opportunities, whether you are starting out or seeking leadership positions. Online programs offer the flexibility to study while balancing work and personal commitments.

For those looking for a cost-effective option, there are affordable online masters programs that help you gain advanced skills without a hefty price tag. If you’re just beginning, consider easy online associate degrees to quickly enter the technology field or prepare for further study.

Careers in tech leadership are growing, and an advanced degree can set you apart. A doctorate organizational leadership online can provide the expertise to move into executive or administrative roles. If education is your field of interest, it’s helpful to know how much does a doctorate in education cost when planning your next steps.

No matter your career goals, exploring these online pathways can help you make informed decisions for a successful future in computer science or related areas.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Karagiannis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles