World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
44
Citations
6105
World Ranking
5935
National Ranking
194

Thomas Böhlke publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Böhlke sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 326 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Thomas Böhlke D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Böhlke sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas Böhlke is affiliated with the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Engineering with significant contributions in several subfields.

The main subfields of study include:

  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Materials Chemistry
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Biomedical Engineering

Their work covers a variety of topics, notably:

  • Composite Material Mechanics
  • Numerical methods in engineering
  • Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering
  • Mechanical Behavior of Composites
  • Elasticity and Material Modeling
  • Nonlocal and gradient elasticity in micro/nano structures
  • Microstructure and mechanical properties

Thomas Böhlke has frequently published in the following venues:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Computational Mechanics
  • International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering
  • PAMM
  • International Journal of Solids and Structures

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Matti Schneider
  • Andrew N. Hrymak
  • Alexander Dyck
  • Maximilian Krause
  • Julian Karl Bauer

Recent publications by Thomas Böhlke exemplify their engagement with topics related to material modeling and numerical methods. Selected recent papers include:

  • "Estimation of diaphragm wall deflections for deep braced excavation in anisotropic clays using ensemble learning," 2020, Geoscience Frontiers
  • "On the micromechanics of deep material networks," 2020, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids
  • "Anisotropic hyperelastic constitutive models for finite deformations combining material theory and data-driven approaches with application to cubic lattice metamaterials," 2020, Computational Mechanics
  • "An FE-DMN method for the multiscale analysis of short fiber reinforced plastic components," 2021, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
  • "Fast implicit solvers for phase-field fracture problems on heterogeneous microstructures," 2020, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering

Best Publications

  • Periodic three-dimensional mesh generation for crystalline aggregates based on Voronoi tessellations

    F. Fritzen;T. Böhlke;E. Schnack

  • Computational homogenization of elasto-plastic porous metals

    Felix Fritzen;Samuel Forest;Thomas Böhlke;Djimedo Kondo

  • Efficient fixed point and Newton---Krylov solvers for FFT-based homogenization of elasticity at large deformations

    Matthias Kabel;Thomas Böhlke;Matti Schneider

  • Damage evolution and fracture events sequence in various composites by acoustic emission technique

    A. Bussiba;M. Kupiec;S. Ifergane;R. Piat

  • Review on slip transmission criteria in experiments and crystal plasticity models

    E. Bayerschen;A. T. McBride;B. D. Reddy;T. Böhlke

  • Estimation of diaphragm wall deflections for deep braced excavation in anisotropic clays using ensemble learning

    Runhong Zhang;Chongzhi Wu;Anthony Teck Chee Goh;Thomas Böhlke

  • A gradient plasticity grain boundary yield theory

    Stephan Wulfinghoff;Eric Bayerschen;Thomas Böhlke

  • Three‐dimensional finite element implementation of the nonuniform transformation field analysis

    Felix Fritzen;T. Böhlke

  • Graphical representation of the generalized Hooke's law

    T. Böhlke;C. Brüggemann

  • Strain gradient plasticity modeling of the cyclic behavior of laminate microstructures

    Stephan Wulfinghoff;Samuel Forest;Thomas Böhlke

  • Phase-field elasticity model based on mechanical jump conditions

    Daniel Schneider;Oleg Tschukin;Abhik Choudhury;Michael Selzer

  • Geometrically non-linear modeling of the Portevin–Le Chatelier effect

    T. Böhlke;G. Bondár;Y. Estrin;Y. Estrin;M.A. Lebyodkin

  • Numerical modeling of carbon/carbon composites with nanotextured matrix and 3D pores of irregular shapes

    B. Drach;I. Tsukrov;T. Gross;S. Dietrich

  • Periodic three-dimensional mesh generation for particle reinforced composites with application to metal matrix composites

    F. Fritzen;T. Böhlke

  • Mechanisms of toughening in silicon nitrides: The roles of crack bridging and microstructure

    S. Fünfschilling;T. Fett;M. J. Hoffmann;R. Oberacker

  • Equivalent plastic strain gradient enhancement of single crystal plasticity: theory and numerics

    Stephan Wulfinghoff;Thomas Böhlke

  • Virtual process chain of sheet molding compound: Development, validation and perspectives

    Johannes Görthofer;Nils Meyer;Tarkes Dora Pallicity;Ludwig Schöttl

  • Reduced basis homogenization of viscoelastic composites

    Felix Fritzen;Thomas Böhlke

  • Gradient crystal plasticity including dislocation-based work-hardening and dislocation transport

    Stephan Wulfinghoff;Thomas Böhlke

  • On the micromechanics of deep material networks

    Sebastian Gajek;Matti Schneider;Thomas Böhlke

  • The evolution of Hooke's law due to texture development in FCC polycrystals

    T. Böhlke;A. Bertram

Frequent Co-Authors

Igor Tsukrov
Igor Tsukrov University of New Hampshire
Volker Schulze
Volker Schulze Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Wengang Zhang
Wengang Zhang Chongqing University
Michael J. Hoffmann
Michael J. Hoffmann Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Britta Nestler
Britta Nestler Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Martin Heilmaier
Martin Heilmaier Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Olaf Deutschmann
Olaf Deutschmann Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Samuel Forest
Samuel Forest Mines ParisTech
Dagmar Gerthsen
Dagmar Gerthsen Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Hanlong Liu
Hanlong Liu Chongqing University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the demand for skilled engineers and technology professionals grows, learners are exploring flexible pathways to advance their careers. Online degrees are increasingly popular for those seeking expertise or leadership roles in tech-driven fields.

Consider pursuing an online mba under 25k if you’re looking to blend engineering knowledge with essential business skills. For those interested in leadership with global reach, options like the cheapest aacsb online mba no gmat can offer strong accreditation without the barrier of standardized tests. If your interests pivot toward digital trends, a social media degree is a unique path where technical know-how meets creative strategy.

Engineering skills are also highly valued in industries like tourism and events. With a hospitality management degree online, you can apply technical knowledge in the fast-evolving world of hospitality management.

Online programs offer flexibility and affordability while preparing graduates for diverse roles in technology, management, and beyond. Explore these pathways to expand your opportunities across industries.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Böhlke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles