World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Takashi Yamamoto

Takashi Yamamoto

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
53
Citations
7800
World Ranking
5180
National Ranking
164

Takashi Yamamoto publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Takashi Yamamoto sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 198 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Takashi Yamamoto D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Takashi Yamamoto sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Takashi Yamamoto is affiliated with Kio University in Japan and has contributed to research primarily in the fields of materials science and engineering. Their work spans various subfields including polymers and plastics, materials chemistry, civil and structural engineering, mechanics of materials, and atomic and molecular physics and optics.

Their research topics cover a broad range of materials-related subjects such as polymer crystallization and properties, material dynamics and properties, concrete corrosion and durability, aluminum alloys composites properties, advanced ceramic materials synthesis, biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties, and rheology and fluid dynamics studies.

Yamamoto's recent published papers include the following:

  • "Orientation control of carbon fibers and enhanced thermal/mechanical properties of hot-extruded carbon fibers/aluminum composites" (2021) in Diamond and Related Materials
  • "Microstructure and thermal properties of nickel-coated carbon fibers/aluminum composites" (2020) in Journal of Composite Materials
  • "Chain-Level Analysis of Reinforced Polyethylene through Stretch-Induced Crystallization" (2024) in ACS Macro Letters
  • "Engineering of Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal proteins" (2022) in Journal of Pesticide Science
  • "Alcohol drinking and brain morphometry in apparently healthy community-dwelling Japanese men" (2020) in Alcohol

Yamamoto frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Mohammed Althaf Hussain
  • Shigeru Yao
  • Syed Farooq Adil
  • Satoshi Takaya
  • Kazumichi Uemizu

Publications by Yamamoto appear repeatedly in notable venues such as:

  • Polymers
  • Japanese Journal of JSCE
  • Diamond and Related Materials
  • ACS Macro Letters
  • Journal of Pesticide Science

Best Publications

  • Neural substrates for conditioned taste aversion in the rat

    Takashi Yamamoto;Tsuyoshi Shimura;Noritaka Sako;Yasunobu Yasoshima

  • Receptor that leaves a sour taste in the mouth

    Shinya Ugawa;Shinya Ugawa;Yuki Minami;Wei Guo;Wei Guo;Yoshitsugu Saishin;Yoshitsugu Saishin

  • Taste responses of cortical neurons in freely ingesting rats

    T. Yamamoto;R. Matsuo;Y. Kiyomitsu;R. Kitamura

  • Nav2/NaG channel is involved in control of salt-intake behavior in the CNS.

    Eiji Watanabe;Akihiro Fujikawa;Haruyuki Matsunaga;Yasunobu Yasoshima

  • Conditioned taste aversion in rats with excitotoxic brain lesions

    Unknown

  • Gustatory responses of cortical neurons in rats. I. Response characteristics.

    T. Yamamoto;N. Yuyama;T. Kato;Y. Kawamura

  • Representation of hedonics and quality of taste stimuli in the parabrachial nucleus of the rat

    Takashi Yamamoto;Tsuyoshi Shimura;Nobuyuki Sakai;Norimi Ozaki

  • Amiloride-insensitive currents of the acid-sensing ion channel-2a (ASIC2a)/ASIC2b heteromeric sour-taste receptor channel.

    Shinya Ugawa;Takashi Yamamoto;Takashi Ueda;Yusuke Ishida

  • C-fos expression in the rat brain after intraperitoneal injection of lithium chloride

    T Yamamoto;T Shimura;N Sako;S Azuma

  • Brain mechanisms of taste aversion learning in the rat.

    Takashi Yamamoto;Yoshiyuki Fujimoto

  • Electrophysiological and behavioral studies on the taste of umami substances in the rat.

    Takashi Yamamoto;Ryuji Matsuo;Yoshiyuki Fujimoto;Isao Fukunaga

  • Neural mechanisms of taste aversion learning.

    Takashi Yamamoto

  • The medial preoptic area is involved in both sexual arousal and performance in male rats: re-evaluation of neuron activity in freely moving animals

    Tsuyoshi Shimura;Takashi Yamamoto;Minoru Shimokochi

  • Gustatory responses of cortical neurons in rats. II: Information processing of taste quality

    T. Yamamoto;N. Yuyama;T. Kato;Y. Kawamura

  • Conditioned taste aversion and c‐fos expression in the rat brainstem after administration of various USs

    Unknown

  • Sensory inputs from the oral region to the cerebral cortex in behaving rats: an analysis of unit responses in cortical somatosensory and taste areas during ingestive behavior.

    T. Yamamoto;R. Matsuo;Y. Kiyomitsu;R. Kitamura

  • Functional relations between the cortical gustatory area and the amygdala: electrophysiological and behavioral studies in rats.

    T. Yamamoto;S. Azuma;Y. Kawamura

  • Cortical neurons responding to tactile, thermal and taste stimulations of the rat's tongue

    Takashi Yamamoto;Takashi Yamamoto;Noriyuki Yuyama;Noriyuki Yuyama;Yojiro Kawamura;Yojiro Kawamura

  • Gustatory responses of cortical neurons in rats. III. Neural and behavioral measures compared

    T. Yamamoto;N. Yuyama;T. Kato;Y. Kawamura

  • Taste effects of ‘umami’ substances in hamsters as studied by electrophysiological and conditioned taste aversion techniques

    Takashi Yamamoto;Ryuji Matsuo;Yoshitaka Kiyomitsu;Ryuji Kitamura

  • Studies on gustatory responses of amygdaloid neurons in rats.

    S. Azuma;T. Yamamoto;Y. Kawamura

  • substrates for conditioned taste aversion in the rat

    Takashi Yamamoto;Tsuyoshi Shimura;Noritaka Sako;Yasunobu Yasoshima

Frequent Co-Authors

Tohru Fushiki
Tohru Fushiki Kyoto University
Kazuyuki Aihara
Kazuyuki Aihara University of Tokyo
Masaharu Noda
Masaharu Noda National Institute for Basic Biology
Thomas R. Scott
Thomas R. Scott San Diego State University
Kazuto Kobayashi
Kazuto Kobayashi Fukushima Medical University
Masanobu Kano
Masanobu Kano University of Tokyo
Yukihiro Noda
Yukihiro Noda Meijo University
Jan Bures
Jan Bures Czech Academy of Sciences
Yuchio Yanagawa
Yuchio Yanagawa Gunma University
Federico Bermúdez-Rattoni
Federico Bermúdez-Rattoni National Autonomous University of Mexico

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As interest in neuroscience grows, many students explore related online degrees and certifications to enhance their skills or broaden career options. Choosing a pathway often depends on your career goals, schedule, and budget. For those seeking credentials quickly, online certification courses can provide targeted knowledge in neuroscience, psychology, or healthcare—often leading to well-paying roles in less time than a traditional degree.

If you’re looking for academic flexibility or a less intensive workload, exploring what is the easiest degree to get online might help you find complementary majors or minors that pair well with neuroscience studies. These options can make it easier to balance education with work or family commitments.

Those interested in applied neuroscience might consider fields like social work or behavioral analysis. Accredited online MSW programs prepare graduates for helping roles that intersect with mental health and brain science. Alternatively, pursuing the cheapest bcba online program can lead to certification as a Board Certified Behavior Analyst—a valuable credential for those specializing in behavioral neuroscience and therapy.

Best Scientists Citing Takashi Yamamoto

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles