What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Neuroscience
- Internal medicine
- Taste
His main research concerns Neuroscience, Taste, Electrophysiology, Stimulus and Stimulation.
His Neuroscience research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Food intake and Appetite.
He has researched Taste in several fields, including Solitary nucleus, Amygdala, Neuron and Macaque.
He works mostly in the field of Electrophysiology, limiting it down to topics relating to Cerebral cortex and, in certain cases, Central nervous system, as a part of the same area of interest.
His Stimulus study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Toxicity, Neural activity, Nucleus tractus solitarius and Hindbrain.
His research investigates the connection with Stimulation and areas like Thalamus which intersect with concerns in Nucleus, Extracellular and Pons.
His most cited work include:
- Gustatory responses in the frontal opercular cortex of the alert cynomolgus monkey. (198 citations)
- Conditioned taste aversions modify neural responses in the rat nucleus tractus solitarius (163 citations)
- Taste in the monkey cortex. (160 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary scientific interests are in Neuroscience, Taste, Electrophysiology, Stimulus and Internal medicine.
His study in Neural coding, Thalamus, Forebrain, Amygdala and Neuron is done as part of Neuroscience.
His studies in Taste integrate themes in fields like Communication, Central nervous system, Solitary nucleus and Macaque.
His Electrophysiology study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Cerebral cortex, Glutamate receptor, Gustatory cortex and Evoked potential.
His Stimulus research incorporates themes from Insular cortex, Biochemistry and Stimulation.
His research in Internal medicine intersects with topics in Sugar and Endocrinology.
He most often published in these fields:
- Neuroscience (65.22%)
- Taste (65.22%)
- Electrophysiology (28.26%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2002-2019)?
- Neuroscience (65.22%)
- Taste (65.22%)
- Orbitofrontal cortex (7.61%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Neuroscience, Taste, Orbitofrontal cortex, Thalamus and Forebrain.
His study in Amygdala, Taste aversion, Central nervous system, Solitary tract and Neural coding falls within the category of Neuroscience.
His Taste study combines topics in areas such as Neurophysiology, Communication, Stimulus, Sensory system and Neurochemical.
His Orbitofrontal cortex research integrates issues from Insula, Cortex and Macaque.
His Cortex research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Electrophysiology and Anatomy.
His work in Thalamus covers topics such as Nucleus which are related to areas like Stimulation and Extracellular.
Between 2002 and 2019, his most popular works were:
- Central taste anatomy and neurophysiology. (95 citations)
- Responses to Taste Stimulation in the Ventroposteromedial Nucleus of the Thalamus in Rats (70 citations)
- Gustatory Neural Responses in the Medial Orbitofrontal Cortex of the Old World Monkey (61 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Neuroscience
- Internal medicine
- Taste
Thomas R. Scott focuses on Neuroscience, Taste, Thalamus, Forebrain and Taste aversion.
His work in the fields of Neuroscience, such as Electrophysiology, overlaps with other areas such as Tongue.
His Taste research incorporates elements of Neurophysiology, Orbitofrontal cortex, Macaque, Appetite and Food intake.
Thomas R. Scott combines subjects such as Extracellular, Stimulation and Nucleus with his study of Thalamus.
His Forebrain study incorporates themes from Cerebral cortex, Nucleus accumbens, Extended amygdala, Sensory system and Basal ganglia.
His research integrates issues of Recall, Prefrontal cortex, Central nervous system and Amygdala in his study of Taste aversion.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
