World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
31
Citations
3323
World Ranking
3380
National Ranking
1323

Stuart G. Baker publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stuart G. Baker sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 119 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Stuart G. Baker D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stuart G. Baker sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • A perfect correlate does not a surrogate make.

    Stuart G Baker;Barnett S Kramer

  • Regression Analysis for Categorical Variables with Outcome Subject to Nonignorable Nonresponse

    Unknown

  • Using relative utility curves to evaluate risk prediction

    Stuart G. Baker;Nancy R. Cook;Andrew Vickers;Barnett S. Kramer

  • The Multinomial-Poisson Transformation

    Stuart G. Baker

  • Markers for early detection of cancer: Statistical guidelines for nested case-control studies

    Stuart G Baker;Barnett S Kramer;Sudhir Srivastava

  • The transitive fallacy for randomized trials: if A bests B and B bests C in separate trials, is A better than C?

    Stuart G Baker;Barnett S Kramer

  • Closed-form estimates for missing counts in two-way contingency tables

    Stuart G. Baker;William F. Rosenberger;Rebecca Dersimonian

  • Identifying Combinations of Cancer Markers for Further Study as Triggers of Early Intervention

    Unknown

  • Peirce, Youden, and Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves

    Stuart G Baker;Barnett S Kramer

  • Analysis of Survival Data from a Randomized Trial with All-or-None Compliance: Estimating the Cost-Effectiveness of a Cancer Screening Program

    Unknown

  • Evaluation of Markers and Risk Prediction Models Overview of Relationships between NRI and Decision-Analytic Measures

    Ben Van Calster;Andrew J. Vickers;Michael J. Pencina;Stuart G. Baker

  • Correction: A simple method for analyzing data from a randomized trial with a missing binary outcome

    Unknown

  • Marginal Regression for Repeated Binary Data with Outcome Subject to Non- Ignorable Non-Response

    Unknown

  • Putting Risk Prediction in Perspective: Relative Utility Curves

    Unknown

  • Statistical issues in randomized trials of cancer screening

    Stuart G Baker;Barnett S Kramer;Philip C Prorok

  • Evaluating Multiple Diagnostic Tests with Partial Verification

    Unknown

  • Good for women, good for men, bad for people: Simpson's paradox and the importance of sex-specific analysis in observational studies.

    Stuart G. Baker;Barnett S. Kramer

  • The impact of breakthrough clinical trials on survival in population based tumor registries

    Eric J. Feuer;Larry G. Kessler;Stuart G. Baker;Helen E. Triolo

  • Rethinking historical controls

    Unknown

  • Surrogate Endpoints: Wishful Thinking or Reality?

    Unknown

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Mathematics in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths and related online degrees. For those interested in leveraging quantitative skills in business and technology, pursuing a data analytics masters programs is a popular choice. These programs focus on turning complex data into actionable insights, blending mathematical theories with practical applications.

Many professionals also explore management roles by opting for MBA programs. If you’re considering an MBA but want a smoother admission process, exploring the easiest mba specialization can help you find programs tailored to diverse backgrounds.

Additionally, the rise of flexible learning has made pursuing the easiest online mba program a viable option for busy students balancing work and studies. Online formats provide accessibility without compromising educational quality.

For those aiming at leadership roles in business academia or consulting, exploring the cheapest online dba is an excellent way to gain advanced skills without breaking the bank. Choosing the right online degree aligned with your career goals can maximize both learning and return on investment.

Best Scientists Citing Stuart G. Baker

Recently Published Articles