World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 36 8926 8243 659 611 86 7231

Stuart Cobb publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Stuart Cobb between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Stuart Cobb published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 3.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2011. 6 of the 95 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2011. 1995: 2 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 3 publications
1995 2025

95 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Stuart Cobb: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 2
1996 0
1997 3
1998 0
1999 2
2000 1
2001 0
2002 1
2003 2
2004 0
2005 2
2006 4
2007 6
2008 5
2009 6
2010 6
2011 10
2012 2
2013 3
2014 2
2015 9
2016 3
2017 8
2018 2
2019 2
2020 4
2021 2
2022 0
2023 2
2024 3
2025 3
Total 95
Download as CSV

Stuart Cobb publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stuart Cobb sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 78–87 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 86 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406 86
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Stuart Cobb D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stuart Cobb sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435 36
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Stuart Cobb is affiliated with the University of Glasgow in the United Kingdom and focuses primarily on research within the field of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their work spans several subfields, including Molecular Biology, Genetics, Nephrology, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Clinical Psychology.

The main areas of study covered in their research include Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders, RNA modifications and cancer, RNA regulation and disease, Autism Spectrum Disorder Research, Family and Disability Support Research, CRISPR and Genetic Engineering, and Epigenetics and DNA Methylation.

Stuart Cobb has contributed to a number of publications, with recent papers addressing diverse topics. These include:

  • A kinome-wide screen identifies a CDKL5-SOX9 regulatory axis in epithelial cell death and kidney injury (2020) in Nature Communications
  • Rett syndrome (2024) in Nature Reviews Disease Primers
  • Neurophysiological Signatures of Motor Impairment in Patients with Rett Syndrome (2020) in Annals of Neurology
  • Engineering Toxoplasma gondii secretion systems for intracellular delivery of multiple large therapeutic proteins to neurons (2024) in Nature Microbiology
  • Novel MECP2 gene therapy is effective in a multicenter study using two mouse models of Rett syndrome and is safe in non-human primates (2023) in Molecular Therapy

The frequent co-authors in their research include Kamal K.E. Gadalla, Ralph D. Hector, Lucas Pozzo-Miller, Walter E. Kaufmann, and Stephanie A. Zlatic.

Their work has been published in several venues repeatedly, particularly in:

  • Nature Reviews Disease Primers
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • UNC Libraries
  • Nature Microbiology
  • Nature Communications

Best Publications

  • Synchronization of neuronal activity in hippocampus by individual GABAergic interneurons

    S. R. Cobb;E. H. Buhl;K. Halasy;K. Halasy;O. Paulsen

  • Reversal of Neurological Defects in a Mouse Model of Rett Syndrome

    Jacky Guy;Jian Gan;Jim Selfridge;Stuart Cobb

  • Encoding and retrieval in a model of the hippocampal CA1 microcircuit.

    Vassilis Cutsuridis;Stuart Cobb;Bruce P. Graham

  • Clinical and biological progress over 50 years in Rett syndrome

    Helen Leonard;Stuart Cobb;Jenny Downs

  • Synaptic effects of identified interneurons innervating both interneurons and pyramidal cells in the rat hippocampus

    S.R Cobb;K Halasy;K Halasy;I Vida;G Nyı́ri

  • Cholinergic modulation of hippocampal cells and circuits

    Stuart R. Cobb;Ceri H. Davies

  • Morphological and functional reversal of phenotypes in a mouse model of Rett syndrome

    Lianne Robinson;Jacky Guy;Leanne McKay;Emma Brockett

  • Improved Survival and Reduced Phenotypic Severity Following AAV9/MECP2 Gene Transfer to Neonatal and Juvenile Male Mecp2 Knockout Mice

    Kamal Ke Gadalla;Mark Es Bailey;Rosemary C. Spike;Paul D. Ross

  • Radically truncated MeCP2 rescues Rett syndrome-like neurological defects

    Rebekah Tillotson;Jim Selfridge;Martha V. Koerner;Kamal K.E. Gadalla;Kamal K.E. Gadalla

  • Properties of unitary IPSPs evoked by anatomically identified basket cells in the rat hippocampus

    E. H. Buhl;S. R. Cobb;K. Halasy;P. Somogyi

  • Enhanced Hippocampal Long-Term Potentiation and Spatial Learning in Aged 11β-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Type 1 Knock-Out Mice

    Joyce L. W. Yau;Kara M. McNair;June Noble;David Brownstein

  • MeCP2 and Rett syndrome: reversibility and potential avenues for therapy

    Kamal K.E. Gadalla;Kamal K.E. Gadalla;Mark E.S. Bailey;Stuart R. Cobb

  • Synaptic plasticity deficits in an experimental model of rett syndrome: long-term potentiation saturation and its pharmacological reversal

    S.-M. Weng;F. McLeod;M.E.S. Bailey;S.R. Cobb

  • Evoked slow muscarinic acetylcholinergic synaptic potentials in rat hippocampal interneurons.

    Hélène Widmer;L. Ferrigan;C. H. Davies;S. R. Cobb

  • Characterisation of CDKL5 Transcript Isoforms in Human and Mouse.

    Ralph D. Hector;Owen Dando;Nicoletta Landsberger;Charlotte Kilstrup-Nielsen

  • Hippocampal microcircuits : a computational modeler's resource book

    Vassilis Cutsuridis;Bruce P. Graham;Stuart Cobb;Imre Vida

  • Development of a Novel AAV Gene Therapy Cassette with Improved Safety Features and Efficacy in a Mouse Model of Rett Syndrome

    Kamal K.E. Gadalla;Kamal K.E. Gadalla;Thishnapha Vudhironarit;Ralph D. Hector;Sarah Sinnett

  • Reversibility of functional deficits in experimental models of Rett syndrome.

    Stuart Cobb;Jacky Guy;Adrian Bird

  • Inhibition of Piezo1 attenuates demyelination in the central nervous system

    María Velasco-Estevez;María Velasco-Estevez;Kamal K E Gadalla;Núria Liñan-Barba;Stuart Cobb

  • CDKL5 variants: Improving our understanding of a rare neurologic disorder.

    Ralph D. Hector;Vera M. Kalscheuer;Friederike Hennig;Helen Leonard

  • Activation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors patterns network activity in the rodent hippocampus

    Stuart R. Cobb;Diederik O. Bulters;Sachin Suchak;Gernot Riedel

  • A role for RhoB in synaptic plasticity and the regulation of neuronal morphology.

    Kara McNair;Rosemary C Spike;Clare Guilding;George C Prendergast

Frequent Co-Authors

Adrian Bird
Adrian Bird University of Edinburgh
Imre Vida
Imre Vida Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Gernot Riedel
Gernot Riedel University of Aberdeen
Peter Somogyi
Peter Somogyi University of Oxford
Gábor Tamás
Gábor Tamás University of Szeged
Trevor W. Stone
Trevor W. Stone University of Oxford
Andrew D. Randall
Andrew D. Randall University of Exeter
Brian J. Morris
Brian J. Morris University of Glasgow
Peter C. Kind
Peter C. Kind University of Edinburgh
Helen Leonard
Helen Leonard Telethon Kids Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in neuroscience can lead to diverse opportunities, but many related fields also offer flexible online study options. Those interested in clinical roles may consider psyd online programs, which prepare graduates for advanced practice in psychology and mental health.

If you aim to work with families or couples, accelerated mft programs online allow for a faster route to becoming a licensed marriage and family therapist. For students eager to enter the workforce quickly, there are numerous accelerated online programs that offer bachelor’s degrees in less time than traditional formats.

When choosing your degree, it’s wise to consider future salary potential. Research the best bachelor's degrees based on earning outcomes to make an informed decision about your education and career pathway. Each of these options can serve as a stepping stone into neuroscience or other allied health and science careers.

Best Scientists Citing Stuart Cobb

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles