World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
53
Citations
12170
World Ranking
5058
National Ranking
2264

Jeffrey L. Neul publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey L. Neul sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 155 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jeffrey L. Neul D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey L. Neul sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Rett syndrome: Revised diagnostic criteria and nomenclature

    Jeffrey L. Neul;Walter E. Kaufmann;Daniel G. Glaze;John Christodoulou

  • Dysfunction in GABA signalling mediates autism-like stereotypies and Rett syndrome phenotypes

    Hsiao Tuan Chao;Hongmei Chen;Rodney C. Samaco;Mingshan Xue;Mingshan Xue

  • Specific Mutations in Methyl-CpG-Binding Protein 2 Confer Different Severity in Rett Syndrome

    J. L. Neul;P. Fang;J. Barrish;J. Lane

  • Methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MECP2) mutation type is associated with disease severity in Rett syndrome

    Vishnu Anand Cuddapah;Rajesh B Pillai;Kiran V Shekar;Jane B Lane

  • Increased MECP2 gene copy number as the result of genomic duplication in neurodevelopmentally delayed males

    Daniela del Gaudio;Ping Fang;Fernando Scaglia;Patricia A Ward

  • The Xenopus Dorsalizing Factor noggin Ventralizes Drosophila Embryos by Preventing DPP from Activating Its Receptor

    Scott A Holley;Jeffrey L Neul;Liliana Attisano;Jeffrey L Wrana

  • Deletion of Mecp2 in Sim1-expressing neurons reveals a critical role for MeCP2 in feeding behavior, aggression, and the response to stress

    Sharyl L. Fyffe;Jeff L. Neul;Rodney C. Samaco;Hsiao Tuan Chao

  • Loss of MeCP2 in aminergic neurons causes cell-autonomous defects in neurotransmitter synthesis and specific behavioral abnormalities

    Rodney C. Samaco;Caleigh Mandel-Brehm;Hsiao Tuan Chao;Christopher S. Ward

  • Epilepsy and the natural history of Rett syndrome.

    D. G. Glaze;A. K. Percy;S. Skinner;K. J. Motil

  • Neurologic Complications Associated With Influenza A in Children During the 2003–2004 Influenza Season in Houston, Texas

    Stephen M. Maricich;Jeffrey L. Neul;Timothy E. Lotze;Andreea C. Cazacu

  • Preclinical research in Rett syndrome: Setting the foundation for translational success

    David M. Katz;Joanne E. Berger-Sweeney;James H. Eubanks;Monica J. Justice

  • A partial loss of function allele of Methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 predicts a human neurodevelopmental syndrome

    Rodney C. Samaco;John D. Fryer;Jun Ren;Sharyl Fyffe

  • Female Mecp2+/− mice display robust behavioral deficits on two different genetic backgrounds providing a framework for pre-clinical studies

    Rodney C. Samaco;Christopher M. McGraw;Christopher S. Ward;Yaling Sun

  • Mutual antagonism between Sox10 and NFIA regulates diversification of glial lineages and glioma subtypes

    Stacey M Glasgow;Wenyi Zhu;C Claus Stolt;Teng-Wei Huang

  • Rett Syndrome: A Prototypical Neurodevelopmental Disorder

    Jeffrey L. Neul;Huda Y. Zoghbi

  • Trofinetide for the treatment of Rett syndrome: a randomized phase 3 study

    Unknown

  • Developmental delay in Rett syndrome: data from the natural history study

    Jeffrey L. Neul;Jane B. Lane;Hye Seung Lee;Suzanne Geerts

  • Wild-type microglia do not reverse pathology in mouse models of Rett syndrome

    Jieqi Wang;Jan Eike Wegener;Teng Wei Huang;Smitha Sripathy

  • Rett syndrome diagnostic criteria: Lessons from the Natural History Study

    Alan K. Percy;Jeffrey L. Neul;Jeffrey L. Neul;Daniel G. Glaze;Daniel G. Glaze;Kathleen J. Motil;Kathleen J. Motil

  • Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of trofinetide in pediatric Rett syndrome

    Daniel G. Glaze;Jeffrey L. Neul;Walter E. Kaufmann;Elizabeth Berry-Kravis

Frequent Co-Authors

Walter E. Kaufmann
Walter E. Kaufmann Boston Children's Hospital
Huda Y. Zoghbi
Huda Y. Zoghbi Baylor College of Medicine
Eric D. Marsh
Eric D. Marsh Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Xander H.T. Wehrens
Xander H.T. Wehrens Baylor College of Medicine
Carlos A. Bacino
Carlos A. Bacino Baylor College of Medicine
Elizabeth Berry-Kravis
Elizabeth Berry-Kravis Rush University Medical Center
Gary Cutter
Gary Cutter University of Alabama at Birmingham
Andrew A. Pieper
Andrew A. Pieper University of Iowa
James R. Lupski
James R. Lupski Baylor College of Medicine
Richard A. Gibbs
Richard A. Gibbs Baylor College of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jeffrey L. Neul