World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
7659
World Ranking
10372
National Ranking
5442

Steven G. Vandenberg publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven G. Vandenberg sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 119 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Steven G. Vandenberg D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven G. Vandenberg sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1984 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Steven G. Vandenberg was affiliated with the University of Colorado Boulder in the United States. Their academic career included contributions to scientific research recognized by peers in relevant professional organizations.

Vandenberg was awarded the distinction of Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1984, marking recognition from a major scientific society.

There are no records of recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, book publications, or detailed fields and subfields of study publicly available for this researcher. Similarly, specific topics of work, extensive publication records, or other awards are not documented in the accessible data.

Best Publications

  • Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization.

    Steven G. Vandenberg;Allan R. Kuse

  • Spouse similarity in American and Swedish couples.

    Richard A. Price;Steven G. Vandenberg

  • Cognitive Abilities: Use of Family Data as a Control to Assess Sex and Age Differences in Two Ethnic Groups:

    J. R. Wilson;J. C. De Fries;G. E. Mc Clearn;S. G. Vandenberg

  • Familial resemblance for specific cognitive abilities

    J. C. DeFries;R. C. Johnson;A. R. Kuse;G. E. McClearn

  • Parent–offspring resemblance for specific cognitive abilities in two ethnic groups

    J. C. Defries;J. C. Defries;G. C. Ashton;G. C. Ashton;R. C. Johnson;R. C. Johnson;A. R. Kuse;A. R. Kuse

  • Family resemblances in personality

    Frank M. Ahern;Ronald C. Johnson;James R. Wilson;Gerald E. McClearn

  • Near Identity of Cognitive Structure in Two Ethnic Groups

    J. C. DeFries;S. G. Vandenberg;G. E. McClearn;A. R. Kuse

  • Parent-offspring resemblance for cognitive abilities in the Colorado Adoption Project: Biological, adoptive, and control parents and one-year-old children

    J.C. DeFries;Robert Plomin;S.G. Vandenberg;A.R. Kuse

  • Handedness and spatial ability.

    Barbara Sanders;Barbara Sanders;James R. Wilson;James R. Wilson;Steven G. Vandenberg;Steven G. Vandenberg

  • Contributions of twin research to psychology.

    Unknown

  • Sex Differences in Cognition: Evidence from the Hawaii Family Study

    James R. Wilson;Steven G. Vandenberg

  • Assortative mating for IQ and personality due to propinquity and personal preference.

    C. G. N. Mascie-Taylor;S. G. Vandenberg

  • Family background, cognitive ability, and personality as predictors of educational and occupational attainment

    R. C. Johnson;C. T. Nagoshi;F. M. Ahern;J. R. Wilson

  • Genetics of Specific Cognitive Abilities

    J C DeFries;S G Vandenberg;G E McClearn

  • Who discovered the twin method

    Richard D. Rende;Robert Plomin;Steven G. Vandenberg

  • A twin methodology for the study of genetic and environmental control of variation in human smoking behavior.

    David W. Crumpacker;Rune Cederlöf;Lars Friberg;William J. Kimberling

  • Segregation analysis of family data for 15 tests of cognitive ability.

    G. C. Ashton;J. J. Polovina;S. G. Vandenberg

  • Hereditary Factors in Normal Personality Traits (as Measured by Inventories)

    Unknown

  • Sex-by-generation and ethnic group-by-generation interactions in the Hawaii family study of cognition.

    J C DeFries;R P Corley;R C Johnson;S G Vandenberg

  • Assortative marriage for specific cognitive abilities in two ethnic groups.

    Johnson Rc;DeFries Jc;Wilson;McClearn Ge

  • Group differences and first principal-component loadings in the Hawaii family study of cognition: a test of the generality of ‘Spearman's hypothesis’

    Craig T. Nagoshi;Ronald C. Johnson;J.C. DeFries;James R. Wilson

  • Parent-offspring resemblance for specific cognitive abilities in Korea.

    J. Park;R. C. Johnson;J. C. DeFries;G. E. McClearn

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronald C. Johnson
Ronald C. Johnson University of Hawaii at Manoa
David L. Pauls
David L. Pauls Harvard University
John C. DeFries
John C. DeFries University of Colorado Boulder
Craig T. Nagoshi
Craig T. Nagoshi The University of Texas at Arlington
Gerald E. McClearn
Gerald E. McClearn Pennsylvania State University
Robert Plomin
Robert Plomin King's College London
Robin P. Corley
Robin P. Corley University of Colorado Boulder
John C. Loehlin
John C. Loehlin The University of Texas at Austin
Richard Rende
Richard Rende Brown University
Nancy L. Pedersen
Nancy L. Pedersen Karolinska Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in studying psychology in the USA, it’s worth considering related online degrees like social work, counseling, and human services. These fields often overlap with psychology and can lead to rewarding careers in community mental health, healthcare, and education. Many universities now offer flexible online programs, making it easier to balance your studies with other responsibilities.

Affordability is an important factor when choosing a degree. For those seeking the most affordable social work degree programs in Denton or exploring the most affordable social work degree programs in Florida, there are excellent options available. Students in Hawaii should look into affordable social work programs in Honolulu, while those in the Midwest may benefit from the cheapest social work programs in Iowa.

Careers in psychology and social work both require strong communication, empathy, and problem-solving skills. Exploring online degrees in these areas can open multiple career pathways, from clinical practice to nonprofit leadership, and help you make a positive impact in your community.

Best Scientists Citing Steven G. Vandenberg