World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 40 8184 7555 3505 3168 91 4861

Steve C. Danzer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Steve C. Danzer between 1997 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Steve C. Danzer published across 30 years, from 1997 to 2026, averaging 3.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2016. 8 of the 102 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2016. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 2 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 7 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 4 publications 2026: 4 publications
1997 2026

102 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Steve C. Danzer: publications per year, 1997 to 2026
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 1
1999 1
2000 1
2001 1
2002 1
2003 0
2004 3
2005 0
2006 0
2007 1
2008 2
2009 5
2010 1
2011 7
2012 4
2013 4
2014 2
2015 6
2016 10
2017 6
2018 6
2019 9
2020 5
2021 3
2022 4
2023 3
2024 7
2025 4
2026 4
Total 102
Download as CSV

Steve C. Danzer publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steve C. Danzer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 88–97 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 91 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452 91
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Steve C. Danzer D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steve C. Danzer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456 40
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Steve C. Danzer is affiliated with Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center in the United States. Their research encompasses multiple aspects of neuroscience, biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine, with a strong focus on molecular biology and cellular and molecular neuroscience.

Their scientific work includes investigations into neuroscience and neuropharmacology, ion channel regulation and function, epilepsy research and treatment, PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer, retinal development and disorders, mitochondrial function and pathology, and pharmacological effects and toxicity studies.

Steve C. Danzer has authored numerous research papers published in journals such as Epilepsy Currents, Neurobiology of Disease, Experimental Neurology, eNeuro, and the British Journal of Anaesthesia. Notable recent publications include:

  • Effect of dexmedetomidine on sevoflurane-induced neurodegeneration in neonatal rats (2021), British Journal of Anaesthesia
  • PI3K isoform-selective inhibition in neuron-specific PTEN-deficient mice rescues molecular defects and reduces epilepsy-associated phenotypes (2020), Neurobiology of Disease
  • The potassium channel Kv4.2 regulates dendritic spine morphology, electroencephalographic characteristics and seizure susceptibility in mice (2020), Experimental Neurology
  • mTOR-driven neural circuit changes initiate an epileptogenic cascade (2020), Progress in Neurobiology
  • The glucocorticoid receptor specific modulator CORT108297 reduces brain pathology following status epilepticus (2021), Experimental Neurology

Steve C. Danzer collaborates frequently with other researchers in their field. Prominent coauthors include Christina Groß, Candi L. LaSarge, Austin W. Drake, Durgesh Tiwari, and Kimberly L. Kraus. These collaborations reflect a consistent engagement with experts working on related neuroscience and epilepsy research topics.

Their work has appeared most frequently in Epilepsy Currents, with seven publications, as well as in Neurobiology of Disease, Experimental Neurology, and eNeuro, indicating a focus on epilepsy and neurological disorders in their research portfolio.

Best Publications

  • The effects of neonatal isoflurane exposure in mice on brain cell viability, adult behavior, learning, and memory.

    Andreas W. Loepke;George K. Istaphanous;John J. Mcauliffe;Lili Miles

  • Excessive Activation of mTOR in Postnatally Generated Granule Cells Is Sufficient to Cause Epilepsy

    Raymund Y.K. Pun;Isaiah J. Rolle;Candi L. LaSarge;Bethany E. Hosford

  • Comparison of the Neuroapoptotic Properties of Equipotent Anesthetic Concentrations of Desflurane, Isoflurane, or Sevoflurane in Neonatal Mice

    Unknown

  • Increased expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor induces formation of basal dendrites and axonal branching in dentate granule cells in hippocampal explant cultures.

    Steve C. Danzer;Kristy R. C. Crooks;Donald C. Lo;James O. McNamara

  • Pilocarpine-Induced Seizures Cause Selective Time-Dependent Changes to Adult-Generated Hippocampal Dentate Granule Cells

    Unknown

  • Accumulation of Abnormal Adult-Generated Hippocampal Granule Cells Predicts Seizure Frequency and Severity

    Michael S. Hester;Steve C. Danzer;Steve C. Danzer

  • Depression, stress, epilepsy and adult neurogenesis

    Unknown

  • Cell age–specific vulnerability of neurons to anesthetic toxicity

    Unknown

  • Localization of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor to Distinct Terminals of Mossy Fiber Axons Implies Regulation of Both Excitation and Feedforward Inhibition of CA3 Pyramidal Cells

    Steve C. Danzer;James O. McNamara

  • Heterogeneous Integration of Adult-Generated Granule Cells into the Epileptic Brain

    Unknown

  • MicroRNA-Mediated Downregulation of the Potassium Channel Kv4.2 Contributes to Seizure Onset

    Christina Gross;Christina Gross;Christina Gross;Xiaodi Yao;Tobias Engel;Durgesh Tiwari

  • Characterization and Quantification of Isoflurane-Induced Developmental Apoptotic Cell Death in Mouse Cerebral Cortex

    Unknown

  • Abnormalities of granule cell dendritic structure are a prominent feature of the intrahippocampal kainic acid model of epilepsy despite reduced postinjury neurogenesis.

    Brian L. Murphy;Rylon D. Hofacer;Rylon D. Hofacer;Christian N. Faulkner;Andreas W. Loepke;Andreas W. Loepke

  • Hippocampal granule cell pathology in epilepsy — A possible structural basis for comorbidities of epilepsy?

    Unknown

  • Structural plasticity of dentate granule cell mossy fibers during the development of limbic epilepsy.

    Steve C. Danzer;Xiaoping He;Andreas W. Loepke;Andreas W. Loepke;James O. McNamara

  • Impact of Traumatic Brain Injury on Neurogenesis

    Unknown

  • Altered morphology of hippocampal dentate granule cell presynaptic and postsynaptic terminals following conditional deletion of TrkB

    Steve C. Danzer;Robert J. Kotloski;Cynthia Walter;Maya Hughes

  • Ablation of Newly Generated Hippocampal Granule Cells Has Disease-Modifying Effects in Epilepsy

    Unknown

  • Impact of Corticosterone Treatment on Spontaneous Seizure Frequency and Epileptiform Activity in Mice with Chronic Epilepsy

    Olagide Wagner de Castro;Victor Rodrigues Santos;Raymund Y. K. Pun;Jessica M. McKlveen

  • Developmental and post‐injury cortical gliogenesis: A Genetic fate‐mapping study with Nestin‐CreER mice

    Unknown

  • Postnatal and Adult Neurogenesis in the Development of Human Disease

    Steve C. Danzer

  • Morphological changes among hippocampal dentate granule cells exposed to early kindling‐epileptogenesis

    Shatrunjai P. Singh;Shatrunjai P. Singh;Xiaoping He;James O. McNamara;Steve C. Danzer

  • Ontogeny of seizure-induced increases in BDNF immunoreactivity and TrkB receptor activation in rat hippocampus

    Steve C. Danzer;Xiaoping He;James O. McNamara

  • Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis dysfunction in epilepsy.

    Aynara C. Wulsin;Matia B. Solomon;Michael D. Privitera;Steve C. Danzer;Steve C. Danzer

  • PTEN deletion increases hippocampal granule cell excitability in male and female mice.

    Victor R. Santos;Raymund Y.K. Pun;Salwa R. Arafa;Candi L. LaSarge

  • Contributions of mature granule cells to structural plasticity in temporal lobe epilepsy.

    V. R. Santos;O. W. de Castro;O. W. de Castro;R. Y. K. Pun;M. S. Hester

  • PTEN deletion from adult-generated dentate granule cells disrupts granule cell mossy fiber axon structure

    Candi L. LaSarge;Victor R. Santos;Steve C. Danzer;Steve C. Danzer

  • Clonal Analysis of Newborn Hippocampal Dentate Granule Cell Proliferation and Development in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy

    Shatrunjai P. Singh;Shatrunjai P. Singh;Candi L. LaSarge;Amen An;Amen An;John J. McAuliffe

  • Functional disruption of stress modulatory circuits in a model of temporal lobe epilepsy

    Aynara C. Wulsin;Ana Franco-Villanueva;Christian Romancheck;Rachel L. Morano

  • Cannabinoid receptor 1/2 double-knockout mice develop epilepsy.

    Shane Rowley;Xiaofei Sun;Isabel V. Lima;Isabel V. Lima;Alexandra Tavenier

Frequent Co-Authors

Norberto Garcia-Cairasco
Norberto Garcia-Cairasco Universidade de São Paulo
Tobias Engel
Tobias Engel Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
David C. Henshall
David C. Henshall Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
Gary J. Bassell
Gary J. Bassell Emory University
Aaron J. Johnson
Aaron J. Johnson Mayo Clinic
Sudhansu K. Dey
Sudhansu K. Dey Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience can open up diverse academic and professional opportunities. Many students also consider related fields and flexible learning options to broaden their career prospects. For instance, pursuing an affordable msw programs online can lead to roles in mental health and social services, which often intersect with neuroscience in practice and research.

Those interested in behavior analysis might explore bcba programs, which offer specialized training to become Board Certified Behavior Analysts. These programs build on neuroscience fundamentals and prepare graduates for roles supporting individuals with developmental or behavioral challenges.

If you are looking to fast-track your education, msw programs and accelerated psychology programs provide intensive pathways to earn your degree sooner. These accelerated options are ideal for those eager to enter the workforce or advance their careers in neuroscience-adjacent fields such as clinical psychology and social work.

By considering these related online degrees and career pathways, you can tailor your educational journey to your interests and professional goals, all while benefiting from flexible, reputable programs.

Best Scientists Citing Steve C. Danzer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles