World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
36
Citations
5084
World Ranking
7124
National Ranking
92

Stephen R. Wing publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen R. Wing sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 113 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Stephen R. Wing D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen R. Wing sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephen R. Wing is affiliated with the University of Otago in New Zealand. Their research spans across Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences with a focus on marine and ecological systems. Their work notably integrates studies on marine and fisheries research, isotope analysis in ecology, and marine bivalve and aquaculture studies.

The scientist's main fields of study include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences

Within these fields, key subfields of their research are:

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Ecology
  • Oceanography
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Major topics of Stephen R. Wing's work include:

  • Marine and fisheries research
  • Isotope Analysis in Ecology
  • Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies
  • Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
  • Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Marine and coastal ecosystems
  • Marine animal studies overview

The scientist has contributed extensively to journals such as Marine Ecology Progress Series, Scientific Reports, and Ecosphere. Other frequent publication venues include the Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology and the New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research.

Frequent co-authors in their collaborations are:

  • Amandine Sabadel
  • Leonardo M. Durante
  • Rebecca M. McMullin
  • Stina Kolodzey
  • Kimberly J. Hageman

Selected recent publications illustrate the scope of their research:

  • "Whales in the carbon cycle: can recovery remove carbon dioxide?" (2022), Trends in Ecology & Evolution
  • "Effects of fixatives on stable isotopes of fish muscle tissue: implications for trophic studies on preserved specimens" (2020), Ecological Applications
  • "Changes in trophic structure of an exploited fish community at the centennial scale are linked to fisheries and climate forces" (2022), Scientific Reports
  • "Penguins and Seals Transport Limiting Nutrients Between Offshore Pelagic and Coastal Regions of Antarctica Under Changing Sea Ice" (2020), Ecosystems
  • "Shifting trophic architecture of marine fisheries in New Zealand: Implications for guiding effective ecosystem-based management" (2020), Fish and Fisheries

Best Publications

  • Harvest Refugia in Marine Invertebrate Fisheries: Models and Applications to the Red Sea Urchin, Strongylocentrotus franciscanus

    James F. Quinn;Stephen R. Wing;Louis W. Botsford

  • Pulsed delivery of subthermocline water to Conch Reef (Florida Keys) by internal tidal bores

    James J. Leichter;Stephen R. Wing;Steven L. Miller;Mark W. Denny

  • Settlement and transport of benthic invertebrates in an intermittent upwelling region

    Stephen R. Wing;John L. Largier;Louis W. Botsford;James F. Quinn

  • Meroplanktonic distribution and circulation in a coastal retention zone of the northern California upwelling system

    Stephen R. Wing;Louis W. Botsford;Stephen V. Ralston;John L. Largier

  • Breaking internal waves on a Florida (USA) coral reef: a plankton pump at work?

    James J. Leichter;Gregory Shellenbarger;Salvatore J. Genovese;Stephen R. Wing

  • Prehistoric fisheries in the Caribbean

    S. R. Wing;E. S. Wing

  • Exposure to waves enhances the growth rate and nitrogen status of the giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera

    Christopher D. Hepburn;James D. Holborow;Stephen R. Wing;Russell D. Frew

  • Isotopic turnover rate and fractionation in multiple tissues of red rock lobster (Jasus edwardsii) and blue cod (Parapercis colias): Consequences for ecological studies

    Erik Suring;Stephen R. Wing

  • Patterns in the δ13C and δ15N signature of Ulva pertusa: Interaction between physical gradients and nutrient source pools

    Christopher D. Cornelisen;Stephen R. Wing;Kim L. Clark;M. Hamish Bowman

  • Effects of wave-induced lightflecks in the intertidal zone on photosynthesis in the macroalgae Postelsia palmaeformis and Hedophyllum sessile (Phaeophyceae)

    S. R. Wing;M. R. Patterson

  • Inter-annual variability in larval supply to populations of three invertebrate taxa in the northern California Current

    Stephen R Wing;Louis W Botsford;Lance E Morgan;Jennifer M Diehl

  • Spatial variability in red sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus franciscanus) recruitment in northern California

    Lance E. Morgan;Stephen R. Wing;Louis W. Botsford;Carolyn J. Lundquist

  • Topographic shading and wave exposure influence morphology and ecophysiology of Ecklonia radiata (C. Agardh 1817) in Fiordland, New Zealand

    S. R. Wing;J. J. Leichter;C. Perrin;S. M. Rutger

  • Hagfish in the New Zealand fjords are supported by chemoautotrophy of forest carbon

    Rebecca J. McLeod;Stephen R. Wing

  • Strong pathways for incorporation of terrestrially derived organic matter into benthic communities

    Rebecca J. McLeod;Stephen R. Wing

  • Calorific content of New Zealand marine macrophytes

    Miles D. Lamare;Stephen R. Wing

  • A mechanism for onset of diatom blooms in a fjord with persistent salinity stratification

    N.L. Goebel;S.R. Wing;P.W. Boyd

  • Reproductive sources and sinks within a sea urchin, Evechinus chloroticus, population of a New Zealand fjord

    Stephen R. Wing;Mark T. Gibbs;Miles D. Lamare

  • Estimation of growth and mortality parameters from size frequency distributions lacking age patterns : the red sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus franciscanus) as an example

    Barry D. Smith;Louis W. Botsford;Stephen R. Wing

  • Effects of hydrographic barriers on population genetic structure of the sea star Coscinasterias muricata (Echinodermata, Asteroidea) in the New Zealand fiords.

    Cécile Perrin;Stephen R. Wing;Michael S. Roy

Frequent Co-Authors

Russell D. Frew
Russell D. Frew University of Otago
James J. Leichter
James J. Leichter University of California, San Diego
Louis W. Botsford
Louis W. Botsford University of California, Davis
Catriona L. Hurd
Catriona L. Hurd University of Tasmania
Miles D. Lamare
Miles D. Lamare University of Otago
John L. Largier
John L. Largier University of California, Davis
Carolyn J. Lundquist
Carolyn J. Lundquist National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research
James F. Quinn
James F. Quinn University of California, Davis
Mark W. Denny
Mark W. Denny Stanford University
Shane T. Ahyong
Shane T. Ahyong Australian Museum

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution can open doors to various exciting science-focused careers, but many students also consider flexible, in-demand roles in healthcare. Online degrees in nursing are increasingly popular for those seeking fast-track or career-changing opportunities, often with science backgrounds.

If you're interested in transitioning to nursing, it’s helpful to know how long to become a nurse practitioner, as timelines can vary from a few years to even shorter periods with accelerated options. For registered nurses aiming to advance quickly, a 6-month rn to bsn program can provide an efficient route to earn a bachelor's and unlock new career potential.

Those starting with an ADN may consider asn to np programs to bridge directly to a master’s degree. Alternatively, if you’re entering nursing from a science major unrelated to nursing, explore direct entry msn programs for non-nurses. These online pathways allow for career flexibility and take advantage of your existing scientific training within healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen R. Wing

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles