World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 38 8598 7944 3656 3310 153 5185

Silvia Mangia publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Silvia Mangia between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Silvia Mangia published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 6.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2024. 40 of the 171 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2024. 2001: 2 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 22 publications 2025: 18 publications
2001 2025

171 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Silvia Mangia: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 2
2002 0
2003 3
2004 3
2005 0
2006 3
2007 2
2008 2
2009 5
2010 3
2011 5
2012 8
2013 9
2014 4
2015 9
2016 9
2017 14
2018 12
2019 5
2020 7
2021 11
2022 9
2023 6
2024 22
2025 18
Total 171
Download as CSV

Silvia Mangia publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Silvia Mangia sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 148–157 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 153 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459 153
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Silvia Mangia D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Silvia Mangia sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459 38
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Silvia Mangia is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States and has contributed extensively to the fields of medicine and neuroscience. Their research primarily focuses on cognitive neuroscience, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, neurology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, as well as pathology and forensic medicine. This broad range of subfields reflects a diverse and comprehensive approach to brain research and medical imaging.

The scientist's work encompasses key topics such as advanced MRI techniques and applications, functional brain connectivity studies, advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications, neural dynamics and brain function, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, neurological disorders and treatments, and photoreceptor and optogenetics research.

Silvia Mangia has published in numerous scientific venues, most notably:

  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition (20 publications)
  • Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (6 publications)
  • Scientific Reports (5 publications)
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience (5 publications)
  • Journal of Neurochemistry (4 publications)

The scientist frequently collaborates with Shalom Michaeli, Olli Gröhn, Pavel Filip, Jaakko Paasonen, and Ekaterina Paasonen, reflecting a productive collaborative network within their research community.

Notable recent publications by Silvia Mangia include:

  • Neurovascular coupling is optimized to compensate for the increase in proton production from nonoxidative glycolysis and glycogenolysis during brain activation and maintain homeostasis of pH, pCO2, and pO2, 2023, Journal of Neurochemistry
  • Evaluation of denoising strategies for task-based functional connectivity: Equalizing residual motion artifacts between rest and cognitively demanding tasks, 2021, Human Brain Mapping
  • Structural Alterations in Deep Brain Structures in Type 1 Diabetes, 2020, Diabetes
  • Rotating frame MRI relaxations as markers of diffuse white matter abnormalities in multiple sclerosis, 2020, NeuroImage Clinical
  • Different FreeSurfer versions might generate different statistical outcomes in case-control comparison studies, 2022, Neuroradiology

Best Publications

  • Extending the Human Connectome Project across ages: Imaging protocols for the Lifespan Development and Aging projects

    Michael P. Harms;Leah H. Somerville;Beau M. Ances;Jesper Andersson

  • Impact of diabetes on cognitive function and brain structure.

    Amir Moheet;Silvia Mangia;Elizabeth R. Seaquist

  • Sustained neuronal activation raises oxidative metabolism to a new steady-state level: Evidence from 1H NMR spectroscopy in the human visual cortex

    Silvia Mangia;Ivan Tkáč;Rolf Gruetter;Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele

  • The in vivo neuron-to-astrocyte lactate shuttle in human brain: evidence from modeling of measured lactate levels during visual stimulation

    Silvia Mangia;Ian A. Simpson;Susan J. Vannucci;Anthony Carruthers

  • Neurochemical and BOLD responses during neuronal activation measured in the human visual cortex at 7 Tesla

    Petr Bednařík;Ivan Tkáč;Federico Giove;Mauro DiNuzzo

  • Metabolic and hemodynamic events after changes in neuronal activity: current hypotheses, theoretical predictions and in vivo NMR experimental findings.

    Silvia Mangia;Federico Giove;Ivan Tkáč;Nikos K Logothetis

  • Sensitivity of single-voxel 1H-MRS in investigating the metabolism of the activated human visual cortex at 7 T.

    Silvia Mangia;Ivan Tkáč;Rolf Gruetter;Pierre-Francois Van De Moortele

  • The aerobic brain: lactate decrease at the onset of neural activity.

    S Mangia;G Garreffa;M Bianciardi;F Giove

  • Glycogenolysis in astrocytes supports blood-borne glucose channeling not glycogen-derived lactate shuttling to neurons: evidence from mathematical modeling

    Mauro DiNuzzo;Silvia Mangia;Bruno Maraviglia;Federico Giove

  • Issues about the fMRI of the human spinal cord

    Federico Giove;Girolamo Garreffa;Giovanni Giulietti;Silvia Mangia

  • Changes in glucose uptake rather than lactate shuttle take center stage in subserving neuroenergetics: evidence from mathematical modeling

    Mauro DiNuzzo;Silvia Mangia;Bruno Maraviglia;Federico Giove

  • Response to comment on recent modeling studies of astrocyte-neuron metabolic interactions: Much ado about nothing

    Silvia Mangia;Mauro DiNuzzo;Federico Giove;Anthony Carruthers

  • Metabolic Pathways and Activity-Dependent Modulation of Glutamate Concentration in the Human Brain

    Silvia Mangia;Federico Giove;Mauro DiNuzzo

  • Rotating frame relaxation during adiabatic pulses vs. conventional spin lock: simulations and experimental results at 4 T.

    Silvia Mangia;Timo Liimatainen;Michael Garwood;Shalom Michaeli

  • Dynamics of lactate concentration and blood oxygen level-dependent effect in the human visual cortex during repeated identical stimuli

    Silvia Mangia;Ivan Tkác̆;Nikos K. Logothetis;Rolf Gruetter

  • The Role of Astrocytic Glycogen in Supporting the Energetics of Neuronal Activity

    Mauro DiNuzzo;Silvia Mangia;Bruno Maraviglia;Federico Giove

  • Physiological bases of the K+ and the glutamate/GABA hypotheses of epilepsy.

    Mauro DiNuzzo;Silvia Mangia;Bruno Maraviglia;Federico Giove

  • Cortical metabolites as biomarkers in the R6/2 model of Huntington's disease

    Lori Zacharoff;Ivan Tkac;Qingfeng Song;Chuanning Tang

  • Probing Slow Protein Dynamics by Adiabatic R1ρ and R2ρ NMR Experiments

    Silvia Mangia;Nathaniel J. Traaseth;Gianluigi Veglia;Michael Garwood

  • Clinical deep brain stimulation strategies for orientation-selective pathway activation

    Julia P Slopsema;Edgar Peña;Remi Patriat;Lauri J Lehto

  • Neurochemical responses to chromatic and achromatic stimuli in the human visual cortex

    Petr Bednařík;Ivan Tkáč;Federico Giove;Lynn E Eberly

Frequent Co-Authors

Federico Giove
Federico Giove Sapienza University of Rome
Olli Gröhn
Olli Gröhn University of Eastern Finland
Martin Bareš
Martin Bareš Masaryk University
Emiliano Macaluso
Emiliano Macaluso Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Heikki Tanila
Heikki Tanila University of Eastern Finland
Rolf Gruetter
Rolf Gruetter École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Nikos K. Logothetis
Nikos K. Logothetis Chinese Academy of Sciences
Federico De Martino
Federico De Martino Maastricht University
Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele
Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele University of Minnesota
Ian A. Simpson
Ian A. Simpson Pennsylvania State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

When considering a career in neuroscience, students often want to know about education costs, potential salaries, and alternative pathways. If a strong earning potential is a priority, it's helpful to review college majors that make the most money, as this can help guide you toward specializations within neuroscience that offer lucrative opportunities.

Cost is another key factor. Many students are looking for the cheapest online colleges that accept financial aid, which can make a neuroscience degree more affordable and accessible.

For those seeking faster entry into the workforce or a resume boost, there are many online certifications that pay well. Certifications in data analysis or health informatics may complement neuroscience studies and open additional career doors.

If you value flexibility or are balancing education with work, you might explore the easiest degree to get online. Some paths prioritize quicker completion while still aligning with interests in brain science or related healthcare fields.

Best Scientists Citing Silvia Mangia

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles