World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Shorena Janelidze

Shorena Janelidze

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
81
Citations
27633
World Ranking
1556
National Ranking
28

Shorena Janelidze publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shorena Janelidze sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 315 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Shorena Janelidze D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shorena Janelidze sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Shorena Janelidze is affiliated with Lund University in Sweden and works primarily within the field of Medicine, focusing on various subfields including Physiology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Neurology, Molecular Biology, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

The research topics covered by Janelidze's work include:

  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • S100 Proteins and Annexins

Janelidze has published extensively in various scientific venues. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Medicine
  • Nature Aging
  • Brain

Among recent papers, notable publications authored or co-authored by Janelidze include:

  • Plasma P-tau181 in Alzheimer's disease: relationship to other biomarkers, differential diagnosis, neuropathology and longitudinal progression to Alzheimer's dementia, 2020, Nature Medicine
  • Discriminative Accuracy of Plasma Phospho-tau217 for Alzheimer Disease vs Other Neurodegenerative Disorders, 2020, JAMA
  • A multicentre validation study of the diagnostic value of plasma neurofilament light, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Prediction of future Alzheimer's disease dementia using plasma phospho-tau combined with other accessible measures, 2021, Nature Medicine
  • Plasma GFAP is an early marker of amyloid-β but not tau pathology in Alzheimer's disease, 2021, Brain

Janelidze collaborates frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Oskar Hansson
  • Erik Stomrud
  • Niklas Mattsson
  • Sebastian Palmqvist
  • Kaj Blennow

Best Publications

  • Discriminative Accuracy of Plasma Phospho-tau217 for Alzheimer Disease vs Other Neurodegenerative Disorders.

    Sebastian Palmqvist;Shorena Janelidze;Yakeel T. Quiroz;Yakeel T. Quiroz;Henrik Zetterberg

  • Blood phosphorylated tau 181 as a biomarker for Alzheimer's disease: a diagnostic performance and prediction modelling study using data from four prospective cohorts.

    Thomas K. Karikari;Tharick A. Pascoal;Tharick A. Pascoal;Nicholas J. Ashton;Shorena Janelidze

  • Plasma P-tau181 in Alzheimer’s disease: relationship to other biomarkers, differential diagnosis, neuropathology and longitudinal progression to Alzheimer’s dementia

    Shorena Janelidze;Niklas Mattsson;Sebastian Palmqvist;Ruben Smith

  • Diagnostic Value of Cerebrospinal Fluid Neurofilament Light Protein in Neurology: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Bridel C;van Wieringen Wn;Zetterberg H;Tijms Bm

  • Plasma β-amyloid in Alzheimer’s disease and vascular disease

    Shorena Janelidze;Erik Stomrud;Sebastian Palmqvist;Henrik Zetterberg;Henrik Zetterberg

  • Interleukin-6 Is Elevated in the Cerebrospinal Fluid of Suicide Attempters and Related to Symptom Severity

    Daniel Lindqvist;Shorena Janelidze;Peter Hagell;Sophie Erhardt

  • Head-to-head comparison of 10 plasma phospho-tau assays in prodromal Alzheimer’s disease

    Unknown

  • Plasma GFAP is an early marker of amyloid-β but not tau pathology in Alzheimer's disease.

    Joana B Pereira;Joana B Pereira;Shorena Janelidze;Ruben Smith;Niklas Mattsson-Carlgren

  • Spread of pathological tau proteins through communicating neurons in human Alzheimer's disease

    Jacob W. Vogel;Yasser Iturria-Medina;Olof T. Strandberg;Ruben Smith

  • A multicentre validation study of the diagnostic value of plasma neurofilament light.

    Nicholas J. Ashton;Shorena Janelidze;Ahmad Al Khleifat;Antoine Leuzy

  • Plasma tau in Alzheimer disease

    Niklas Mattsson;Henrik Zetterberg;Henrik Zetterberg;Henrik Zetterberg;Shorena Janelidze;Philip S. Insel

  • Prediction of future Alzheimer's disease dementia using plasma phospho-tau combined with other accessible measures.

    Sebastian Palmqvist;Pontus Tideman;Nicholas Cullen;Henrik Zetterberg

  • CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 and Aβ42/Aβ38 ratios: better diagnostic markers of Alzheimer disease

    Shorena Janelidze;Henrik Zetterberg;Niklas Mattsson;Sebastian Palmqvist

  • Blood-based NfL : A biomarker for differential diagnosis of parkinsonian disorder

    Oskar Hansson;Shorena Janelidze;Sara Hall;Nadia Magdalinou

  • Head-to-Head Comparison of 8 Plasma Amyloid-β 42/40 Assays in Alzheimer Disease.

    Shorena Janelidze;Charlotte E. Teunissen;Henrik Zetterberg;Henrik Zetterberg;José Antonio Allué

  • Discriminative accuracy of [18F]flortaucipir positron emission tomography for Alzheimer disease vs other neurodegenerative disorders

    Rik Ossenkoppele;Rik Ossenkoppele;Gil D. Rabinovici;Ruben Smith;Hanna Cho

  • Performance of Fully Automated Plasma Assays as Screening Tests for Alzheimer Disease-Related β-Amyloid Status.

    Sebastian Palmqvist;Shorena Janelidze;Erik Stomrud;Henrik Zetterberg

  • Cerebrospinal fluid p-tau217 performs better than p-tau181 as a biomarker of Alzheimer's disease.

    Shorena Janelidze;Erik Stomrud;Ruben Smith;Sebastian Palmqvist

  • Cerebrospinal fluid and plasma biomarker trajectories with increasing amyloid deposition in Alzheimer's disease

    Sebastian Palmqvist;Philip S Insel;Philip S Insel;Erik Stomrud;Shorena Janelidze

  • Connecting inflammation with glutamate agonism in suicidality

    Sophie Erhardt;Chai K Lim;Klas R Linderholm;Shorena Janelidze

  • Cytokine levels in the blood may distinguish suicide attempters from depressed patients

    Shorena Janelidze;Daniele Mattei;Åsa Westrin;Lil Träskman-Bendz

  • Cerebrospinal fluid inflammatory markers in Parkinson's disease - Associations with depression, fatigue, and cognitive impairment.

    Daniel Lindqvist;Sara Hall;Yulia Surova;Henrietta M. Nielsen;Henrietta M. Nielsen

Frequent Co-Authors

Oskar Hansson
Oskar Hansson Lund University
Kaj Blennow
Kaj Blennow University of Gothenburg
Henrik Zetterberg
Henrik Zetterberg University of Gothenburg
Erik Stomrud
Erik Stomrud Lund University
Sebastian Palmqvist
Sebastian Palmqvist Lund University
Niklas Mattsson
Niklas Mattsson Lund University
Ruben Smith
Ruben Smith Lund University
Rik Ossenkoppele
Rik Ossenkoppele Lund University
Joana B. Pereira
Joana B. Pereira Karolinska Institute
Danielle van Westen
Danielle van Westen Lund University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience often leads students to consider related fields and flexible learning options online. For those seeking foundational knowledge, a bachelors in psychology online offers an accessible way to gain insights into human behavior and mental processes—often at a lower cost and with flexible schedules.

Graduate programs further expand career pathways. Many prospective counselors and therapists are interested in the online masters MFT (Marriage and Family Therapy), which can lead to licensure for clinical practice. If you’re considering social work, you might wonder, how long does it take to get a msw online? Program lengths vary, but online MSWs offer accelerated options and greater flexibility for working professionals.

Those aiming to practice as clinical psychologists might explore psyd programs, which combine rigorous academic knowledge with clinical experience, often in a convenient online format. Together, these online degrees create diverse pathways for students passionate about neuroscience and related fields, supporting careers in research, mental health, and therapy.

Best Scientists Citing Shorena Janelidze

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles