World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ruben Smith

Ruben Smith

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
57
Citations
14689
World Ranking
4296
National Ranking
78

Ruben Smith publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ruben Smith sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 185 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Ruben Smith D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ruben Smith sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ruben Smith is affiliated with Lund University in Sweden and focuses extensively on research in the field of medicine, with particular emphasis on physiology, psychiatry and mental health, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, cognitive neuroscience, and neurology. Their work primarily addresses several key topics including Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, dementia and cognitive impairment research, functional brain connectivity studies, advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications, medical imaging techniques and applications, neurological disease mechanisms and treatments, and Parkinson's disease mechanisms and treatments.

Recent papers by Ruben Smith illustrate a concentration on biomarkers and pathological mechanisms related to Alzheimer's disease. These include:

  • Discriminative Accuracy of Plasma Phospho-tau217 for Alzheimer Disease vs Other Neurodegenerative Disorders, 2020, published in JAMA
  • Plasma P-tau181 in Alzheimer's disease: relationship to other biomarkers, differential diagnosis, neuropathology and longitudinal progression to Alzheimer's dementia, 2020, published in Nature Medicine
  • Four distinct trajectories of tau deposition identified in Alzheimer's disease, 2021, published in Nature Medicine
  • Spread of pathological tau proteins through communicating neurons in human Alzheimer's disease, 2020, published in Nature Communications
  • Plasma GFAP is an early marker of amyloid-β but not tau pathology in Alzheimer's disease, 2021, published in Brain

Ruben Smith frequently collaborates with a set of co-authors who contribute prominently to their research output. These collaborators include:

  • Oskar Hansson
  • Olof Strandberg
  • Erik Stomrud
  • Rik Ossenkoppele
  • Sebastian Palmqvist

Smith's research findings are regularly published in a range of scientific journals and venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • JAMA Neurology
  • Brain
  • Nature Communications

Their body of work comprises over 340 publications in the broader field of medicine, with significant contributions to subfields such as physiology and psychiatry, reflecting a multidisciplinary engagement with neurological and cognitive disorders. The scope of topics covered illustrates an integration of clinical biomarker research, neuroimaging, and neuropathological studies, focused on improving the understanding of disease mechanisms and progression in Alzheimer's disease and related neurodegenerative conditions.

Best Publications

  • Discriminative Accuracy of Plasma Phospho-tau217 for Alzheimer Disease vs Other Neurodegenerative Disorders.

    Sebastian Palmqvist;Shorena Janelidze;Yakeel T. Quiroz;Yakeel T. Quiroz;Henrik Zetterberg

  • Plasma P-tau181 in Alzheimer’s disease: relationship to other biomarkers, differential diagnosis, neuropathology and longitudinal progression to Alzheimer’s dementia

    Shorena Janelidze;Niklas Mattsson;Sebastian Palmqvist;Ruben Smith

  • Four distinct trajectories of tau deposition identified in Alzheimer’s disease

    Jacob W Vogel;Alexandra L Young;Neil P Oxtoby;Ruben Smith

  • Amyloid and tau PET-positive cognitively unimpaired individuals are at high risk for future cognitive decline

    Unknown

  • Plasma GFAP is an early marker of amyloid-β but not tau pathology in Alzheimer's disease.

    Joana B Pereira;Joana B Pereira;Shorena Janelidze;Ruben Smith;Niklas Mattsson-Carlgren

  • Spread of pathological tau proteins through communicating neurons in human Alzheimer's disease

    Jacob W. Vogel;Yasser Iturria-Medina;Olof T. Strandberg;Ruben Smith

  • Discriminative accuracy of [18F]flortaucipir positron emission tomography for Alzheimer disease vs other neurodegenerative disorders

    Rik Ossenkoppele;Rik Ossenkoppele;Gil D. Rabinovici;Ruben Smith;Hanna Cho

  • Cerebrospinal fluid p-tau217 performs better than p-tau181 as a biomarker of Alzheimer's disease.

    Shorena Janelidze;Erik Stomrud;Ruben Smith;Sebastian Palmqvist

  • Functional brain architecture is associated with the rate of tau accumulation in Alzheimer’s disease

    Unknown

  • Associations of Plasma Phospho-Tau217 Levels With Tau Positron Emission Tomography in Early Alzheimer Disease

    Shorena Janelidze;David Berron;Ruben Smith;Olof Strandberg

  • Aβ deposition is associated with increases in soluble and phosphorylated tau that precede a positive Tau PET in Alzheimer's disease.

    Niklas Mattsson-Carlgren;Emelie Andersson;Shorena Janelidze;Rik Ossenkoppele;Rik Ossenkoppele

  • Orexin loss in Huntington's disease

    Åsa Petersén;Joana Gil;Marion L.C. Maat-Schieman;Maria Björkqvist

  • Associations between tau, Aβ, and cortical thickness with cognition in Alzheimer disease.

    Rik Ossenkoppele;Ruben Smith;Tomas Ohlsson;Olof Strandberg

  • Accuracy of Tau Positron Emission Tomography as a Prognostic Marker in Preclinical and Prodromal Alzheimer Disease: A Head-to-Head Comparison Against Amyloid Positron Emission Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

    Rik Ossenkoppele;Rik Ossenkoppele;Ruben Smith;Niklas Mattsson-Carlgren;Colin Groot

  • Synaptic dysfunction in Huntington's disease: a new perspective

    Ruben Smith;Patrik Brundin;Jia-Yi Li

  • Soluble P-tau217 reflects amyloid and tau pathology and mediates the association of amyloid with tau

    Niklas Mattsson-Carlgren;Shorena Janelidze;Randall J Bateman;Ruben Smith

  • Diagnostic Performance of RO948 F 18 Tau Positron Emission Tomography in the Differentiation of Alzheimer Disease From Other Neurodegenerative Disorders.

    Antoine Leuzy;Ruben Smith;Rik Ossenkoppele;Rik Ossenkoppele;Alexander Santillo

  • Untangling the association of amyloid-β and tau with synaptic and axonal loss in Alzheimer's disease

    Joana B Pereira;Joana B Pereira;Shorena Janelidze;Rik Ossenkoppele;Rik Ossenkoppele;Hlin Kvartsberg;Hlin Kvartsberg

  • Early stages of tau pathology and its associations with functional connectivity, atrophy and memory.

    David Berron;Jacob W Vogel;Philip S Insel;Philip S Insel;Joana B Pereira

  • 18F-AV-1451 tau PET imaging correlates strongly with tau neuropathology in MAPT mutation carriers.

    Ruben Smith;Andreas Puschmann;Michael Schöll;Michael Schöll;Tomas Ohlsson

  • 18F-AV-1451 and CSF T-tau and P-tau as biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease

    Niklas Mattsson;Michael Schöll;Olof Strandberg;Ruben Smith

  • Increased metabolism in the R6/2 mouse model of Huntington's disease.

    Jorien M.M. van der Burg;Karl Bacos;Nigel I. Wood;Andreas Lindqvist

  • Distinct 18F-AV-1451 tau PET retention patterns in early- and late-onset Alzheimer's disease.

    Michael Schöll;Michael Schöll;Rik Ossenkoppele;Olof Strandberg;Sebastian Palmqvist

  • Cholinergic neuronal defect without cell loss in Huntington's disease.

    Ruben Smith;Hinfan Chung;Sara Rundquist;Marion L.C. Maat-Schieman

Frequent Co-Authors

Oskar Hansson
Oskar Hansson Lund University
Rik Ossenkoppele
Rik Ossenkoppele Lund University
Sebastian Palmqvist
Sebastian Palmqvist Lund University
Erik Stomrud
Erik Stomrud Lund University
Michael Schöll
Michael Schöll University of Gothenburg
Shorena Janelidze
Shorena Janelidze Lund University
Niklas Mattsson
Niklas Mattsson Lund University
Gil D. Rabinovici
Gil D. Rabinovici University of California, San Francisco
Kaj Blennow
Kaj Blennow University of Gothenburg
Philip S. Insel
Philip S. Insel University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Ruben Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles