World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Shaharin Anwar Sulaiman

Shaharin Anwar Sulaiman

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 33 3016 2833 18 18 221 4526

Shaharin Anwar Sulaiman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Shaharin Anwar Sulaiman between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Shaharin Anwar Sulaiman published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 18.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 44 publications in 2014. 21 of the 358 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 44. Peak 44 publications in 2014. 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 3 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 24 publications 2014: 44 publications 2015: 29 publications 2016: 24 publications 2017: 32 publications 2018: 26 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 34 publications 2021: 31 publications 2022: 22 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 10 publications
2007 2025

358 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Shaharin Anwar Sulaiman: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 1
2008 1
2009 3
2010 4
2011 15
2012 19
2013 24
2014 44
2015 29
2016 24
2017 32
2018 26
2019 22
2020 34
2021 31
2022 22
2023 6
2024 11
2025 10
Total 358
Download as CSV

Shaharin Anwar Sulaiman publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shaharin Anwar Sulaiman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 217–226 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 221 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117 221
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Shaharin Anwar Sulaiman D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shaharin Anwar Sulaiman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153 33
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Slow release coating remedy for nitrogen loss from conventional urea: a review.

    Muhammad Yasin Naz;Shaharin Anwar Sulaiman

  • Influence of Dirt Accumulation on Performance of PV Panels

    Shaharin Anwar Sulaiman;Atul Kumar Singh;Mior Maarof Mior Mokhtar;Mohammed A. Bou-Rabee

  • Flow start-up and transportation of waxy crude oil in pipelines-A review

    Girma T. Chala;Shaharin Anwar Sulaiman;Azuraien Japper-Jaafar

  • EFFECTS OF DUST ON THE PERFORMANCE OF PV PANELS

    Shaharin A. Sulaiman;Haizatul H. Hussain;Nik Siti H. Nik Leh;Mohd S. I. Razali

  • Trends of Syngas as a Fuel in Internal Combustion Engines

    Ftwi Yohaness Hagos;A. Rashid A. Aziz;Shaharin Anwar Sulaiman

  • Syngas production from downdraft gasification of oil palm fronds.

    Samson Mekbib Atnaw;Shaharin Anwar Sulaiman;Suzana Yusup

  • Kinetic studies of co-pyrolysis of rubber seed shell with high density polyethylene

    Bridgid Lai Fui Chin;Suzana Yusup;Ahmed Al Shoaibi;Pravin Kannan

  • Effect of various blended fuels on syngas quality and performance in catalytic co-gasification: A review

    Muddasser Inayat;Shaharin A. Sulaiman;Jundika Candra Kurnia;Muhammad Shahbaz;Muhammad Shahbaz

  • Using artificial neural networks to estimate solar radiation in Kuwait

    Mohammed Bou-Rabee;Shaharin A. Sulaiman;Magdy Saad Saleh;Suhaila Marafi

  • A critical review on the influence of process parameters in catalytic co-gasification: Current performance and challenges for a future prospectus

    Muhammad Shahbaz;Tareq Al-Ansari;Muddasser Inayat;Shaharin A. Sulaiman

  • Study of the effects of operating factors on the resulting producer gas of oil palm fronds gasification with a single throat downdraft gasifier

    Fiseha M. Guangul;Shaharin A. Sulaiman;Anita Ramli

  • Effect of particle size and temperature on gasification performance of coconut and palm kernel shells in downdraft fixed-bed reactor

    Ahmad Zubair Yahaya;Mahendra Rao Somalu;Andanastuti Muchtar;Shaharin Anwar Sulaiman

  • Air catalytic biomass (PKS) gasification in a fixed-bed downdraft gasifier using waste bottom ash as catalyst with NARX neural network modelling

    Muhammad Shahbaz;Muhammad Shahbaz;Syed Ali Ammar Taqvi;Syed Ali Ammar Taqvi;Muddasser Inayat;Abrar Inayat

  • Effect of blending ratio and catalyst loading on co-gasification of wood chips and coconut waste

    Shaharin Anwar Sulaiman;Raihanna Roslan;Muddasser Inayat;Muhammad Yasin Naz

  • Syngas (H2/CO) in a spark-ignition direct-injection engine. Part 1: Combustion, performance and emissions comparison with CNG

    Ftwi Yohaness Hagos;A. Rahsid Abd Aziz;Shaharin A. Sulaiman

  • Parametric analysis and optimization for the catalytic air gasification of palm kernel shell using coal bottom ash as catalyst

    Abrar Inayat;Muddasser Inayat;Muhammad Shahbaz;Muhammad Shahbaz;Shaharin A. Sulaiman

  • Co-gasification of palm kernel shell and polystyrene plastic: Effect of different operating conditions

    Mohd Hafif Basha;Mohd Hafif Basha;Shaharin Anwar Sulaiman;Yoshimitsu Uemura

  • Catalytic co-gasification of coconut shells and oil palm fronds blends in the presence of cement, dolomite, and limestone: Parametric optimization via Box Behnken Design

    Muddasser Inayat;Shaharin A. Sulaiman;Jundika Candra Kurnia

  • Assessing the implementation levels of oil palm waste conversion methods in Malaysia and the challenges of commercialisation: Towards sustainable energy production

    H.A. Umar;H.A. Umar;S.A. Sulaiman;M.A. Meor Said;A. Gungor

  • Testing of starch-based carbohydrate polymer coatings for enhanced urea performance

    M. Y. Naz;S. A. Sulaiman

Frequent Co-Authors

Suzana Yusup
Suzana Yusup Sunway University
Muhammad Shahbaz
Muhammad Shahbaz Beijing Institute of Technology
Zahid Hussain
Zahid Hussain Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Khalid Mohammed Khan
Khalid Mohammed Khan University of Karachi
Jundika C. Kurnia
Jundika C. Kurnia Curtin University Sarawak
Abrar Inayat
Abrar Inayat University of Sharjah
Rizalman Mamat
Rizalman Mamat Universiti Malaysia Pahang
Khairul Habib
Khairul Habib Universiti Teknologi Petronas
Wan Ramli Wan Daud
Wan Ramli Wan Daud University of Malaya
Tareq Al-Ansari
Tareq Al-Ansari Hamad bin Khalifa University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering opens doors to various specialized fields, but many students also explore related online degrees to enhance their skills or pivot their careers. For those interested in human factors or counseling within technical industries, understanding the nuances of different degrees can be crucial. Resources like different types of counseling degrees-which is right for you provide valuable insights into choosing the best option.

For professionals seeking quick career advancement, knowing the fastest and easiest counseling degree programs can be a game changer. These programs facilitate timely upskilling without compromising quality, allowing graduates to enter specialized roles efficiently.

Those interested in behavioral analysis, often relevant to ergonomics and user experience in engineering design, might consider the fastest bcba program online. It offers a streamlined path to certification while balancing study and existing professional commitments.

Beyond engineering, aspiring experts should also assess the competitiveness of advanced degrees like speech pathology. Learning how hard it is to get into speech pathology grad school helps students gauge realistic admission expectations and prepare accordingly for interdisciplinary roles.

Best Scientists Citing Shaharin Anwar Sulaiman

Recently Published Articles