World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
73
Citations
26177
World Ranking
19551
National Ranking
9731

Scott R. VandenBerg publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott R. VandenBerg sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 257 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Scott R. VandenBerg D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott R. VandenBerg sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Scott R. VandenBerg is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine, with a notable focus on molecular biology and oncology.

The scientist's recent publications reflect engagement with cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying cancer and immune response. Their recent papers include:

  • Characterizing the Tumor Immune Microenvironment with Tyramide-Based Multiplex Immunofluorescence (2020, Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia)
  • A reversible SRC-relayed COX2 inflammatory program drives resistance to BRAF and EGFR inhibition in BRAFV600E colorectal tumors (2023, Nature Cancer)
  • Genetically edited CD34 + cells derived from human iPS cells in vivo but not in vitro engraft and differentiate into HIV-resistant cells (2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • Abstract 4735: Targeting CDK1/2-driven mechanisms of resistance to BRAF and EGFR inhibition in BRAF(V600E) colorectal cancer restores therapeutic response (2024, Cancer Research)
  • A reversible SRC-relayed COX2-inflammatory program drives therapeutic resistance in BRAFV600E colorectal tumors (2022, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory))

Their main fields of study include:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Medicine

Subfields of focus comprise:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Oncology
  • Pharmacology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Immunology

Key topics in the scientist's work are:

  • Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
  • Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
  • Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
  • Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Cell Image Analysis Techniques
  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Scott R. VandenBerg include:

  • Chloé E. Atreya
  • Changjun Wang
  • Denise P. Muñoz
  • Yeonjoo Hwang
  • Christina Moelders

The scientist's recent work is published in peer-reviewed venues such as:

  • Nature Cancer
  • Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Cancer Research
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Best Publications

  • Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways

    Roger McLendon;Allan Friedman;Darrell Bigner;Erwin G. Van Meir

  • Comprehensive, Integrative Genomic Analysis of Diffuse Lower-Grade Gliomas.

    Daniel J. Brat;Roel G.W. Verhaak;Kenneth D. Aldape;W. K.Alfred Yung

  • Cell-of-Origin Patterns Dominate the Molecular Classification of 10,000 Tumors from 33 Types of Cancer.

    Katherine A. Hoadley;Christina Yau;Christina Yau;Toshinori Hinoue;Denise M. Wolf

  • Role of Extent of Resection in the Long-Term Outcome of Low-Grade Hemispheric Gliomas

    Justin S. Smith;Edward F. Chang;Kathleen R. Lamborn;Susan M. Chang

  • HIF1α Induces the Recruitment of Bone Marrow-Derived Vascular Modulatory Cells to Regulate Tumor Angiogenesis and Invasion

    Rose Du;Kan V. Lu;Claudia Petritsch;Patty Liu

  • miR-124 and miR-137 inhibit proliferation of glioblastoma multiforme cells and induce differentiation of brain tumor stem cells.

    Joachim Silber;Daniel A Lim;Claudia Petritsch;Anders I Persson

  • Genomic and Functional Approaches to Understanding Cancer Aneuploidy

    Alison M. Taylor;Alison M. Taylor;Juliann Shih;Gavin Ha;Gavin Ha;Galen F. Gao

  • Radiation-induced impairment of hippocampal neurogenesis is associated with cognitive deficits in young mice

    Radoslaw Rola;Jacob Raber;Angela Rizk;Shinji Otsuka

  • Radiation-induced cognitive impairments are associated with changes in indicators of hippocampal neurogenesis.

    Jacob Raber;Radoslaw Rola;Anthony LeFevour;Duncan Morhardt

  • The Genetic Landscape of the Childhood Cancer Medulloblastoma

    D. Williams Parsons;D. Williams Parsons;Meng Li;Xiaosong Zhang;Siân Jones

  • A hierarchy of self-renewing tumor-initiating cell types in glioblastoma

    Ruihuan Chen;Merry C. Nishimura;Stephanie M. Bumbaca;Samir Kharbanda

  • Enhancer hijacking activates GFI1 family oncogenes in medulloblastoma

    Paul A. Northcott;Catherine Lee;Catherine Lee;Thomas Zichner;Adrian M. Stütz

  • PDGFRα-Positive B Cells Are Neural Stem Cells in the Adult SVZ that Form Glioma-like Growths in Response to Increased PDGF Signaling

    Erica L. Jackson;Jose Manuel Garcia-Verdugo;Sara Gil-Perotin;Monica Roy

  • Extrachromosomal oncogene amplification drives tumour evolution and genetic heterogeneity

    Kristen M. Turner;Viraj Deshpande;Doruk Beyter;Tomoyuki Koga

  • Targeted degradation of sense and antisense C9orf72 RNA foci as therapy for ALS and frontotemporal degeneration

    Clotilde Lagier-Tourenne;Michael Baughn;Frank Rigo;Shuying Sun

  • Tumor heterogeneity is an active process maintained by a mutant EGFR-induced cytokine circuit in glioblastoma

    Maria-del-Mar Inda;Rudy Bonavia;Akitake Mukasa;Akitake Mukasa;Yoshitaka Narita

  • Erratum: Comprehensive Characterization of Cancer Driver Genes and Mutations (ARTICLE (2018) 173(2) (371–385), (S009286741830237X), (10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.060))

    Matthew H. Bailey;Collin Tokheim;Eduard Porta-Pardo;Sohini Sengupta

  • Relationship of glioblastoma multiforme to neural stem cell regions predicts invasive and multifocal tumor phenotype

    Daniel A. Lim;Soonmee Cha;Mary C. Mayo;Mei-Hsiu Chen

  • Phase II Study of Erlotinib Plus Temozolomide During and After Radiation Therapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Multiforme or Gliosarcoma

    Michael D. Prados;Susan M. Chang;Nicholas Butowski;Rebecca DeBoer

  • Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. A clinicopathologic study of 28 cases.

    John E. Wanebo;Jacek M. Malik;Scott R. Vandenberg M.D.;Harold J. Wanebo

Frequent Co-Authors

Mitchel S. Berger
Mitchel S. Berger University of California, San Francisco
Steven L. Gonias
Steven L. Gonias University of California, San Diego
Michael D. Prados
Michael D. Prados University of California, San Francisco
Mary M. Herman
Mary M. Herman National Institutes of Health
Frank B. Furnari
Frank B. Furnari University of California, San Diego
C. David James
C. David James Northwestern University
Webster K. Cavenee
Webster K. Cavenee University of California, San Diego
Kathleen R. Lamborn
Kathleen R. Lamborn University of California, San Francisco
Joanna J. Phillips
Joanna J. Phillips University of California, San Francisco
Susan M. Chang
Susan M. Chang University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in Medicine or healthcare doesn’t always mean becoming a doctor. There are many related online degrees and career pathways worth exploring, depending on your interests and goals.

For those interested in healthcare leadership, an healthcare administration accelerated degree can prepare graduates for management roles in hospitals, clinics, and other medical settings. If you’re a registered nurse looking to advance quickly, asn to fnp programs offer a bridge to the Family Nurse Practitioner role while building on your nursing foundation.

Those interested in the role of nutrition in health and disease can consider a bachelor's in nutrition online, which opens doors to careers in dietetics, public health, or wellness coaching. Working professionals searching for leadership opportunities in healthcare can benefit from whats the best online mha program for working adults to fit study around their current schedule.

These pathways offer flexible, accredited learning options and can help you align your studies with your chosen healthcare career.

Best Scientists Citing Scott R. VandenBerg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles