| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | Current World Ranking | National Ranking | Current National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medicine | 100 | 8183 | 7694 | 4243 | 3930 | 219 | 44551 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Scot E. Moss between 1975 and 2016, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Scot E. Moss published across 42 years, from 1975 to 2016, averaging 5.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 1995. 3 of the 220 publications appeared in the last two years.
220 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1975 | 2 |
| 1976 | 0 |
| 1977 | 1 |
| 1978 | 1 |
| 1979 | 1 |
| 1980 | 0 |
| 1981 | 2 |
| 1982 | 0 |
| 1983 | 1 |
| 1984 | 8 |
| 1985 | 7 |
| 1986 | 3 |
| 1987 | 10 |
| 1988 | 6 |
| 1989 | 10 |
| 1990 | 10 |
| 1991 | 8 |
| 1992 | 12 |
| 1993 | 8 |
| 1994 | 14 |
| 1995 | 19 |
| 1996 | 10 |
| 1997 | 6 |
| 1998 | 7 |
| 1999 | 10 |
| 2000 | 7 |
| 2001 | 7 |
| 2002 | 6 |
| 2003 | 4 |
| 2004 | 9 |
| 2005 | 6 |
| 2006 | 6 |
| 2007 | 9 |
| 2008 | 3 |
| 2009 | 1 |
| 2010 | 1 |
| 2011 | 1 |
| 2012 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1 |
| 2014 | 0 |
| 2015 | 1 |
| 2016 | 2 |
| Total | 220 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scot E. Moss sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 219 publications — 4th percentile
4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 101–120 | 5 | |
| 121–140 | 26 | |
| 141–160 | 73 | |
| 161–180 | 155 | |
| 181–200 | 230 | |
| 201–220 | 363 | 219 |
| 221–240 | 487 | |
| 241–260 | 545 | |
| 261–280 | 722 | |
| 281–300 | 768 | |
| 301–320 | 834 | |
| 321–340 | 895 | |
| 341–360 | 922 | |
| 361–380 | 838 | |
| 381–400 | 861 | |
| 401–420 | 918 | |
| 421–440 | 806 | |
| 441–460 | 771 | |
| 461–480 | 751 | |
| 481–500 | 713 | |
| 501–520 | 617 | |
| 521–540 | 610 | |
| 541–560 | 537 | |
| 561–580 | 504 | |
| 581–600 | 509 | |
| 601–620 | 396 | |
| 621–640 | 386 | |
| 641–660 | 371 | |
| 661–680 | 340 | |
| 681–700 | 336 | |
| 701–720 | 307 | |
| 721–740 | 259 | |
| 741–760 | 230 | |
| 761–780 | 228 | |
| 781–800 | 217 | |
| 801–820 | 204 | |
| 821–840 | 186 | |
| 841–860 | 177 | |
| 861–880 | 155 | |
| 881–900 | 139 | |
| 901–920 | 145 | |
| 921–940 | 116 | |
| 941–960 | 133 | |
| 961–980 | 91 | |
| 981–1,000 | 96 | |
| 1,001–1,020 | 77 | |
| 1,021–1,040 | 70 | |
| 1,041–1,060 | 63 | |
| 1,061–1,080 | 77 | |
| 1,081–1,100 | 49 | |
| 1,101–1,120 | 54 | |
| 1,121–1,140 | 49 | |
| 1,141–1,160 | 51 | |
| 1,161–1,180 | 35 | |
| 1,181–1,200 | 39 | |
| 1,201–1,220 | 26 | |
| 1,221–1,240 | 37 | |
| 1,241–1,260 | 36 | |
| 1,261–1,280 | 27 | |
| 1,281–1,300 | 32 | |
| 1,301–1,320 | 28 | |
| 1,321–1,340 | 17 | |
| 1,341–1,360 | 30 | |
| 1,361–1,380 | 28 | |
| 1,381–1,400 | 17 | |
| 1,401–1,420 | 21 | |
| 1,421–1,440 | 15 | |
| 1,441–1,460 | 12 | |
| 1,461–1,480 | 12 | |
| 1,481–1,500 | 18 | |
| 1,501–1,520 | 14 | |
| 1,521–1,540 | 17 | |
| 1,541–1,560 | 15 | |
| 1,561–1,580 | 6 | |
| 1,581–1,600 | 2 | |
| 1,601–1,620 | 12 | |
| 1,621–1,640 | 11 | |
| 1,641–1,660 | 8 | |
| 1,661–1,680 | 5 | |
| 1,681–1,700 | 5 | |
| 1,701–1,720 | 10 | |
| 1,721–1,740 | 12 | |
| 1,741–1,760 | 14 | |
| 1,761–1,780 | 6 | |
| 1,781–1,795 | 5 | |
| 1,796+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scot E. Moss sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 100 D-Index — 60th percentile
60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 70–71 | 226 | |
| 72–73 | 391 | |
| 74–75 | 574 | |
| 76–77 | 730 | |
| 78–79 | 891 | |
| 80–81 | 972 | |
| 82–83 | 1,027 | |
| 84–85 | 1,003 | |
| 86–87 | 960 | |
| 88–89 | 970 | |
| 90–91 | 922 | |
| 92–93 | 839 | |
| 94–95 | 808 | |
| 96–97 | 779 | |
| 98–99 | 668 | |
| 100–101 | 611 | 100 |
| 102–103 | 630 | |
| 104–105 | 513 | |
| 106–107 | 541 | |
| 108–109 | 445 | |
| 110–111 | 429 | |
| 112–113 | 399 | |
| 114–115 | 393 | |
| 116–117 | 318 | |
| 118–119 | 302 | |
| 120–121 | 287 | |
| 122–123 | 255 | |
| 124–125 | 256 | |
| 126–127 | 252 | |
| 128–129 | 230 | |
| 130–131 | 179 | |
| 132–133 | 168 | |
| 134–135 | 163 | |
| 136–137 | 159 | |
| 138–139 | 134 | |
| 140–141 | 134 | |
| 142–143 | 118 | |
| 144–145 | 109 | |
| 146–147 | 106 | |
| 148–149 | 74 | |
| 150–151 | 79 | |
| 152–153 | 80 | |
| 154–155 | 87 | |
| 156–157 | 57 | |
| 158–159 | 74 | |
| 160–161 | 69 | |
| 162–163 | 60 | |
| 164–165 | 53 | |
| 166–167 | 39 | |
| 168–169 | 42 | |
| 170–171 | 32 | |
| 172–173 | 39 | |
| 174–175 | 40 | |
| 176–177 | 28 | |
| 178–179 | 19 | |
| 180–181 | 23 | |
| 182–183 | 31 | |
| 184–185 | 18 | |
| 186–187 | 20 | |
| 188–189 | 22 | |
| 190–191 | 13 | |
| 192–193 | 21 | |
| 194–195 | 12 | |
| 196–197 | 12 | |
| 198–199 | 14 | |
| 200–201 | 15 | |
| 202–203 | 13 | |
| 204–205 | 10 | |
| 206–207 | 8 | |
| 208–209 | 4 | |
| 210–211 | 12 | |
| 212–213 | 11 | |
| 214–215 | 10 | |
| 216 | 4 | |
| 217+ | 98 |
Scot E. Moss is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their academic profile includes engagement within that institution, contributing to its research environment.
While specific details about their recent papers, co-authors, and frequent publication venues are not available, this affiliation indicates active involvement in a research-centric academic setting.
No published book contributions or awards have been documented, nor are there detailed records of their main or subfields of study. Similarly, explicit topics of research focus have not been provided.
Despite the absence of certain details, the information available positions Scot E. Moss as a researcher connected with a major university known for a diverse range of academic disciplines and research outputs.
Ronald Klein;Barbara E. K. Klein;Scot E. Moss;Matthew D. Davis
Ronald Klein;Barbara E.K. Klein;Scot E. Moss;Kathryn L.P. Linton
Ronald Klein;Barbara E.K. Klein;Scot E. Moss;Matthew D. Davis
Ronald Klein;Barbara E. K. Klein;Scot E. Moss;Matthew D. Davis
Kempen Jh;O'Colmain Bj;Leske Mc;Haffner Sm
Scot E. Moss;Ronald Klein;Barbara E. K. Klein
Ronald Klein;Barbara E.K. Klein;Scot E. Moss;Matthew D. Davis
Ronald Klein;Barbara E.K Klein;Scot E Moss;Karen J Cruickshanks
Ronald Klein;Barbara E.K. Klein;Scot E. Moss;Karen J. Cruickshanks
Scot E. Moss;Ronald Klein;Barbara E.K. Klein
Ronald Klein;Barbara E.K. Klein;Scot E. Moss
Ronald Klein;Barbara E. K. Klein;Scot E. Moss;Karen J. Cruickshanks
Ronald Klein;Barbara E. K. Klein;Scot E. Moss;Matthew D. Davis
R Klein;B E Klein;S E Moss;S M Meuer
Charles T. Valmadrid;Ronald Klein;Scot E. Moss;Barbara E. K. Klein
R. Klein;Qin Wang;B. E. K. Klein;S. E. Moss
Ronald Klein;Barbara E. K. Klein;Scot E. Moss;Matthew D. Davis
Qin Wang;B. E. K. Klein;R. Klein;S. E. Moss
Ronald Klein;Scot E. Moss;Stacy M. Meuer;Barbara E. K. Klein
Ronald Klein;Barbara E. K. Klein;Scot E. Moss;Matthew D. Davis
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
If you’re considering Medicine in the USA but interested in flexible learning options, online healthcare degrees offer compelling alternatives. Many professionals start their journey with practical nursing credentials, with fast track lpn programs letting you enter the workforce quickly.
Registered nurses aiming to enhance their qualifications may explore rn to bsn without clinicals programs. These are convenient for working RNs, removing the need for additional clinical hours while advancing education.
For those targeting leadership or specialized roles, Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) degrees are increasingly accessible. Busy professionals may benefit from accelerated dnp programs online for faster completion. Cost-conscious students might consider the cheapest online dnp programs, which provide quality education at a lower price point.
These pathways offer greater flexibility, affordability, and speed than traditional on-campus options, making them attractive routes for aspiring healthcare professionals.