World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
100
Citations
44551
World Ranking
8184
National Ranking
4244

Scot E. Moss publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scot E. Moss sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 219 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Scot E. Moss D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scot E. Moss sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 100 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Scot E. Moss is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their academic profile includes engagement within that institution, contributing to its research environment.

While specific details about their recent papers, co-authors, and frequent publication venues are not available, this affiliation indicates active involvement in a research-centric academic setting.

No published book contributions or awards have been documented, nor are there detailed records of their main or subfields of study. Similarly, explicit topics of research focus have not been provided.

Despite the absence of certain details, the information available positions Scot E. Moss as a researcher connected with a major university known for a diverse range of academic disciplines and research outputs.

Best Publications

  • The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy: II. Prevalence and Risk of Diabetic Retinopathy When Age at Diagnosis Is Less Than 30 Years

    Ronald Klein;Barbara E. K. Klein;Scot E. Moss;Matthew D. Davis

  • The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Retinopathy in adults with newly discovered and previously diagnosed diabetes mellitus.

    Ronald Klein;Barbara E.K. Klein;Scot E. Moss;Kathryn L.P. Linton

  • The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy. VI: Retinal photocoagulation

    Ronald Klein;Barbara E.K. Klein;Scot E. Moss;Matthew D. Davis

  • The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy. III. Prevalence and risk of diabetic retinopathy when age at diagnosis is 30 or more years.

    Ronald Klein;Barbara E. K. Klein;Scot E. Moss;Matthew D. Davis

  • The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy among adults in the United States.

    Kempen Jh;O'Colmain Bj;Leske Mc;Haffner Sm

  • Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Dry Eye Syndrome

    Scot E. Moss;Ronald Klein;Barbara E. K. Klein

  • The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy: IV. Diabetic Macular Edema

    Ronald Klein;Barbara E.K. Klein;Scot E. Moss;Matthew D. Davis

  • The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy: XVII. The 14-year incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy and associated risk factors in type 1 diabetes

    Ronald Klein;Barbara E.K Klein;Scot E Moss;Karen J Cruickshanks

  • The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy XV: The Long-term Incidence of Macular Edema

    Ronald Klein;Barbara E.K. Klein;Scot E. Moss;Karen J. Cruickshanks

  • Ten-year Incidence of Visual Loss in a Diabetic Population

    Scot E. Moss;Ronald Klein;Barbara E.K. Klein

  • Visual Impairment in Diabetes

    Ronald Klein;Barbara E.K. Klein;Scot E. Moss

  • The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of diabetic retinopathy. XIV. Ten-year incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy.

    Ronald Klein;Barbara E. K. Klein;Scot E. Moss;Karen J. Cruickshanks

  • Glycosylated hemoglobin predicts the incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy.

    Ronald Klein;Barbara E. K. Klein;Scot E. Moss;Matthew D. Davis

  • The epidemiology of retinal vein occlusion: the Beaver Dam Eye Study.

    R Klein;B E Klein;S E Moss;S M Meuer

  • The risk of cardiovascular disease mortality associated with microalbuminuria and gross proteinuria in persons with older-onset diabetes mellitus.

    Charles T. Valmadrid;Ronald Klein;Scot E. Moss;Barbara E. K. Klein

  • The relationship of age-related maculopathy, cataract, and glaucoma to visual acuity.

    R. Klein;Qin Wang;B. E. K. Klein;S. E. Moss

  • The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy: IX. Four-Year Incidence and Progression of Diabetic Retinopathy When Age at Diagnosis Is Less Than 30 Years

    Ronald Klein;Barbara E. K. Klein;Scot E. Moss;Matthew D. Davis

  • Refractive status in the Beaver Dam Eye Study.

    Qin Wang;B. E. K. Klein;R. Klein;S. E. Moss

  • The 15-year cumulative incidence of retinal vein occlusion: the Beaver Dam Eye Study.

    Ronald Klein;Scot E. Moss;Stacy M. Meuer;Barbara E. K. Klein

  • The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy. X. Four-year incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy when age at diagnosis is 30 years or more.

    Ronald Klein;Barbara E. K. Klein;Scot E. Moss;Matthew D. Davis

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronald Klein
Ronald Klein University of Wisconsin–Madison
Barbara E. K. Klein
Barbara E. K. Klein University of Wisconsin–Madison
Karen J. Cruickshanks
Karen J. Cruickshanks University of Wisconsin–Madison
David L. DeMets
David L. DeMets University of Wisconsin–Madison
Tien Yin Wong
Tien Yin Wong Tsinghua University
Mari Palta
Mari Palta University of Wisconsin–Madison
Steven M. Haffner
Steven M. Haffner The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Jerome I. Rotter
Jerome I. Rotter UCLA Medical Center
Noel K. Maclaren
Noel K. Maclaren Cornell University
Sudha K. Iyengar
Sudha K. Iyengar Case Western Reserve University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering Medicine in the USA but interested in flexible learning options, online healthcare degrees offer compelling alternatives. Many professionals start their journey with practical nursing credentials, with fast track lpn programs letting you enter the workforce quickly.

Registered nurses aiming to enhance their qualifications may explore rn to bsn without clinicals programs. These are convenient for working RNs, removing the need for additional clinical hours while advancing education.

For those targeting leadership or specialized roles, Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) degrees are increasingly accessible. Busy professionals may benefit from accelerated dnp programs online for faster completion. Cost-conscious students might consider the cheapest online dnp programs, which provide quality education at a lower price point.

These pathways offer greater flexibility, affordability, and speed than traditional on-campus options, making them attractive routes for aspiring healthcare professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Scot E. Moss

Recently Published Articles