World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
56
Citations
13191
World Ranking
4060
National Ranking
1932

Sariel Har-Peled publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sariel Har-Peled sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 250 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Sariel Har-Peled D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sariel Har-Peled sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sariel Har-Peled is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the United States. Their main field of study is Computer Science, with a focus spanning several subfields. These subfields include Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Computer Networks and Communications, and Signal Processing.

The core areas of research for Har-Peled concentrate on Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation, Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs, Data Management and Algorithms, Optimization and Search Problems, Digital Image Processing Techniques, Advanced Graph Theory Research, and Point processes and geometric inequalities.

Har-Peled has published extensively, with notable recent papers such as:

  • "Fair near neighbor search via sampling" (2021) published in ACM SIGMOD Record
  • "Stabbing pairwise intersecting disks by five points" (2021) published in Discrete Mathematics
  • "Edge Estimation with Independent Set Oracles" (2020) published in ACM Transactions on Algorithms
  • "Sampling a Near Neighbor in High Dimensions" (2022) published in Padua Research Archive (University of Padua)
  • "Sampling near neighbors in search for fairness" (2022) published in Communications of the ACM

The frequent coauthors working alongside Har-Peled include Mitchell Jones, Eliot W. Robson, Stav Ashur, Martin Aumüller, and Sepideh Mahabadi. These collaborations reflect a sustained engagement with researchers sharing interest in similar scientific challenges.

Har-Peled's publications have appeared in various venues, with a significant number of works featured in:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • Discrete & Computational Geometry
  • ACM Transactions on Algorithms
  • Algorithmica

Best Publications

  • On coresets for k-means and k-median clustering

    Sariel Har-Peled;Soham Mazumdar

  • Approximate Nearest Neighbor: Towards Removing the Curse of Dimensionality

    Sariel Har-Peled;Piotr Indyk;Rajeev Motwani

  • Approximate clustering via core-sets

    Mihai Bādoiu;Sariel Har-Peled;Piotr Indyk

  • Geometric Approximation via Coresets

    P. K. Agarwal;S. Har-Peled;K. Varadarajan

  • Geometric Approximation Algorithms

    Sariel Har-peled

  • Smaller Coresets for k-Median and k-Means Clustering

    Sariel Har-Peled;Akash Kushal

  • Efficiently approximating the minimum-volume bounding box of a point set in three dimensions

    Gill Barequet;Sariel Har-Peled

  • Approximating extent measures of points

    Pankaj K. Agarwal;Sariel Har-Peled;Kasturi R. Varadarajan

  • Fast Construction of Nets in Low-Dimensional Metrics and Their Applications

    Sariel Har-Peled;Manor Mendel;Manor Mendel

  • Constraint Classification for Multiclass Classification and Ranking

    Sariel Har-Peled;Dan Roth;Dav Zimak

  • Optimally Cutting a Surface into a Disk

    Jeff Erickson;Sariel Har-Peled

  • Generalization Bounds for the Area Under the ROC Curve

    Shivani Agarwal;Thore Graepel;Ralf Herbrich;Sariel Har-Peled

  • How fast is the k-means method?

    Sariel Har-Peled;Bardia Sadri

  • A replacement for Voronoi diagrams of near linear size

    S. Har-Peled

  • Near-Linear Time Approximation Algorithms for Curve Simplification

    Pankaj K. Agarwal;Sariel Har-Peled;Nabil H. Mustafa;Yusu Wang

  • Approximation algorithms for two optimal location problems in sensor networks

    A. Efrat;S. Har-Peled;J.S.B. Mitchell

  • Constraint classification: A new approach to multiclass classification

    Sariel Har-Peled;Dan Roth;Dav Zimak

  • Jaywalking Your Dog: Computing the Fréchet Distance with Shortcuts

    Anne Driemel;Sariel Har-Peled

  • The fréchet distance revisited and extended

    Sariel Har-Peled;Benjamin Raichel

  • On Approximating the Depth and Related Problems

    Boris Aronov;Sariel Har-Peled

Frequent Co-Authors

Pankaj K. Agarwal
Pankaj K. Agarwal Duke University
Micha Sharir
Micha Sharir Tel Aviv University
Boris Aronov
Boris Aronov New York University
Timothy M. Chan
Timothy M. Chan University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Dan Roth
Dan Roth University of Pennsylvania
Haim Kaplan
Haim Kaplan Tel Aviv University
Kasturi Varadarajan
Kasturi Varadarajan University of Iowa
Alon Efrat
Alon Efrat University of Arizona
Yusu Wang
Yusu Wang University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens many doors—both in traditional classrooms and through dynamic online programs. For those seeking flexibility, there are numerous pathways to consider.

Many students pursue business and tech together. An increasingly popular option is a cheap mba online, which pairs well with a tech background for leadership or management roles.

If you want to upskill and enter the workforce quickly, consider quick degrees online that pay well. These programs focus on in-demand skills and can lead to lucrative career options in a short timeframe.

Fast-paced learners might benefit from online one year masters programs, which allow you to earn an advanced degree and accelerate your career without a long-term commitment.

For those especially interested in future-focused technology, exploring an ai degree online can equip you with specialized knowledge in machine learning, robotics, and data science.

Each of these online pathways can enrich your Computer Science journey, offering both flexibility and strong career prospects.

Best Scientists Citing Sariel Har-Peled

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles