World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
41
Citations
20844
World Ranking
1840
National Ranking
781

Computer Science

D-Index
41
Citations
20898
World Ranking
8564
National Ranking
3661

David M. Mount publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David M. Mount sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 207 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

David M. Mount D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David M. Mount sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

David M. Mount is affiliated with the University of Maryland, College Park in the United States. Their research spans a range of topics within computer science and mathematics, with a focus on computational geometry and related areas.

Their work primarily covers these main fields of study:

  • Computer Science
  • Mathematics

Within these fields, more specialized subfields include:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Signal Processing
  • Applied Mathematics

David M. Mount's research topics include:

  • Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation
  • Data Management and Algorithms
  • Point processes and geometric inequalities
  • Optimization and Search Problems
  • Machine Learning and Algorithms
  • Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Machine Learning and Data Classification

Frequent collaborators in their work include:

  • Auguste H. Gezalyan
  • Guilherme D. da Fonseca
  • Ahmed Abdelkader
  • Sunil Arya
  • Alejandro Flores-Velazco

Their publications appear in both journals and preprint repositories. Most frequent publication venues are:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
  • ACM Transactions on Algorithms

Recent papers authored by David M. Mount include:

  • On Efficient Shortest Path Computation on Terrain Surface: A Direction-Oriented Approach, 2024, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
  • Optimal Bound on the Combinatorial Complexity of Approximating Polytopes, 2022, ACM Transactions on Algorithms
  • Proximity Queries on Terrain Surface, 2022, ACM Transactions on Database Systems
  • Guarantees on nearest-neighbor condensation heuristics, 2020, Computational Geometry
  • Economical Convex Coverings and Applications, 2024, SIAM Journal on Computing

Best Publications

  • An efficient k-means clustering algorithm: analysis and implementation

    T. Kanungo;D.M. Mount;N.S. Netanyahu;C.D. Piatko

  • An optimal algorithm for approximate nearest neighbor searching fixed dimensions

    Sunil Arya;David M. Mount;Nathan S. Netanyahu;Ruth Silverman

  • An optimal algorithm for approximate nearest neighbor searching

    Sunil Arya;David M. Mount;Nathan S. Netanyahu;Ruth Silverman

  • The discrete geodesic problem

    Joseph S. B. Mitchell;David M. Mount;Christos H. Papadimitriou

  • A local search approximation algorithm for k-means clustering

    Tapas Kanungo;David M. Mount;Nathan S. Netanyahu;Christine D. Piatko

  • Approximate nearest neighbor queries in fixed dimensions

    Sunil Arya;David M. Mount

  • ANN: library for approximate nearest neighbor searching

    Sunil Arya;DM Mount

  • Algorithms for facility location problems with outliers

    Moses Charikar;Samir Khuller;David M. Mount;Giri Narasimhan

  • An output-sensitive algorithm for computing visibility

    Subir Kumar Ghosh;David M. Mount

  • A FAST IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ISODATA CLUSTERING ALGORITHM

    Nargess Memarsadeghi;Nargess Memarsadeghi;David M. Mount;Nathan S. Netanyahu;Nathan S. Netanyahu;Jacqueline Le Moigne

  • Euclidean spanners: short, thin, and lanky

    Sunil Arya;Gautam Das;David M. Mount;Jeffrey S. Salowe

  • Isomorphism of graphs with bounded eigenvalue multiplicity

    László Babai;D. Yu. Grigoryev;David M. Mount

  • Algorithms for fast vector quantization

    S. Arya;D.M. Mount

  • Space-time tradeoffs for approximate nearest neighbor searching

    Sunil Arya;Theocharis Malamatos;David M. Mount

  • Efficient algorithms for robust feature matching

    David M Mount;Nathan S Netanyahu;Jacqueline Le Moigne

  • The analysis of a simple k-means clustering algorithm

    Tapas Kanungo;David M. Mount;Nathan S. Netanyahu;Christine Piatko

  • Approximate range searching

    Sunil Arya;David M. Mount

  • A POINT-PLACEMENT STRATEGY FOR CONFORMING DELAUNAY TETRAHEDRALIZATION

    Michael Murphy;David M. Mount;Carl W. Gable

  • An output sensitive algorithm for computing visibility graphs

    Subir Kumar Ghosh;David M. Mount

  • Randomized and deterministic algorithms for geometric spanners of small diameter

    S. Arya;D.M. Mount;M. Smid

  • Analysis of Approximate Nearest Neighbor Searching with Clustered Point Sets

    Songrit Maneewongvatana;David M. Mount

Frequent Co-Authors

Longin Jan Latecki
Longin Jan Latecki Temple University
Sariel Har-Peled
Sariel Har-Peled University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Joseph S. B. Mitchell
Joseph S. B. Mitchell Stony Brook University
Michiel Smid
Michiel Smid Carleton University
Clifford Stein
Clifford Stein Columbia University
Jeff Erickson
Jeff Erickson University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Michael T. Goodrich
Michael T. Goodrich University of California, Irvine
Subhash Suri
Subhash Suri University of California, Santa Barbara
Esther M. Arkin
Esther M. Arkin Stony Brook University
Siu-Wing Cheng
Siu-Wing Cheng Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Mathematics in the USA opens doors to various related fields that enhance both analytical skills and career prospects. For those interested in applying mathematical knowledge to big data, pursuing a masters data analytics degree is a popular choice. This specialization combines statistical methods with computer science to solve real-world problems across industries.

For students looking to complement their quantitative skills with business acumen, online MBA programs provide flexible options. Identifying the easiest mba to get into can help reduce barriers to entry while delivering essential leadership training.

Many professionals prefer the convenience of an easy online mba to balance education with work commitments. These programs often offer accelerated paths to boost advancement opportunities without compromising quality.

For those aiming at higher-level administrative roles, an online Doctor of Business Administration (DBA) is valuable. The dba online programs provide cost-effective routes to gain expertise in strategy, leadership, and research, perfectly complementing a mathematics background.

Best Scientists Citing David M. Mount

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles