World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 61 2961 1179 107 17219

San-Pin Wang publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by San-Pin Wang between 1958 and 2006, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. San-Pin Wang published across 49 years, from 1958 to 2006, averaging 2.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 1967. 4 of the 115 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1958 to 2006. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 1967. 1958: 1 publication 1959: 3 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 2 publications 1963: 1 publication 1964: 0 publications 1965: 1 publication 1966: 0 publications 1967: 11 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 1 publication 1973: 3 publications 1974: 3 publications 1975: 4 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 5 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 1 publication 1980: 1 publication 1981: 3 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 6 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 8 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 4 publications
1958 2006

115 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
San-Pin Wang: publications per year, 1958 to 2006
Year Publications
1958 1
1959 3
1960 0
1961 0
1962 2
1963 1
1964 0
1965 1
1966 0
1967 11
1968 0
1969 0
1970 1
1971 0
1972 1
1973 3
1974 3
1975 4
1976 0
1977 5
1978 1
1979 1
1980 1
1981 3
1982 2
1983 3
1984 2
1985 5
1986 1
1987 6
1988 3
1989 8
1990 6
1991 3
1992 3
1993 7
1994 3
1995 3
1996 1
1997 2
1998 3
1999 4
2000 4
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 4
Total 115
Download as CSV

San-Pin Wang publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where San-Pin Wang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 105–114 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 107 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190 107
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

San-Pin Wang D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where San-Pin Wang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123 61
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Overview

San-Pin Wang was affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their professional activity included academic research within the scope of higher education and scholarly contribution.

Details about their published papers or specific research articles were not available. Similarly, there was no recorded information on frequent co-authors or regular publication venues associated with their work.

The scientist did not have documented main fields of study, subfields, or main research topics registered in the available data. There were also no book publications linked to their name through known academic publishers.

No awards or recognitions attributed to San-Pin Wang were noted during their career in the provided data.

The lack of detailed publishing records and research focus areas suggests limited publicly accessible information regarding their academic output and specialization fields. Their affiliation with a major research university indicates involvement in research activities or academic duties consistent with that environment.

Best Publications

  • New and emerging etiologies for community-acquired pneumonia with implications for therapy. A prospective multicenter study of 359 cases.

    Fang Gd;Fine M;Orloff J;Arisumi D

  • A New Respiratory Tract Pathogen: Chlamydia pneumoniae Strain TWAR

    J. Thomas Grayston;Lee Ann Campbell;Cho-Chou Kuo;Carl H. Mordhorst

  • A new Chlamydia psittaci strain, TWAR, isolated in acute respiratory tract infections.

    J. T. Grayston;Cho-Chou Kuo;San-Pin Wang;J. Altman

  • Immunologic Relationship Between Genital Tric, Lymphogranuloma Venereum, and Related Organisms in a New Microtiter Indirect Immunofluorescence Test

    San-Pin Wang;J. Thomas Grayston

  • Association of prior infection with Chlamydia pneumoniae and angiographically demonstrated coronary artery disease

    D. H. Thom;J. T. Grayston;D. S. Siscovick;San-Pin Wang

  • Polymicrobial etiology of acute pelvic inflammatory disease.

    Eschenbach Da;Buchanan Tm;Pollock Hm;Forsyth Ps

  • Etiology of Nongonococcal Urethritis

    K K Holmes;H H Handsfield;S P Wang;B B Wentworth

  • Chlamydia pneumoniae sp. nov. for Chlamydia sp. Strain TWAR

    J. T. Grayston;Cho-Chou Kuo;L. A. Campbell;San-Pin Wang

  • New knowledge of chlamydiae and the diseases they cause.

    J. Thomas Grayston;San-pin Wang

  • Chlamydia pneumoniae (TWAR) in Atherosclerosis of the Carotid Artery

    J. Thomas Grayston;Cho Chou Kuo;Alan S. Coulson;Lee Ann Campbell

  • Detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae TWAR in Human Coronary Atherectomy Tissues

    L. A. Campbell;E. R. O'brien;A. L. Cappuccio;Cho-Chou Kuo

  • Evidence that Chlamydia pneumoniae Causes Pneumonia and Bronchitis

    J. T. Grayston;M. B. Aldous;A. Easton;San-Pin Wang

  • Past infection by Chlamydia pneumoniae strain TWAR and asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis

    Sandra L. Melnick;Eyal Shahar;Aaron R. Folsom;J. Thomas Grayston

  • Chlamydia trachomatis proctitis

    Thomas C. Quinn;Steven E. Goodell;Emmanuel Mkrtichian;Michael D. Schuffler

  • Pneumonia Associated with the TWAR Strain of Chlamydia

    Thomas J. Marrie;J. Thomas Grayston;San-Pin Wang;Cho-Chou Kuo

  • Human Serology in Chlamydia trachomatis Infection with Microimmunofluorescence

    S. P. Wang;J. T. Grayston

  • INCREASED FREQUENCY OF SERUM ANTIBODIES TO CHLAMYDIA TRACHOMATIS IN INFERTILITY DUE TO DISTAL TUBAL DISEASE

    DonaldE Moore;HjordisM Foy;JanetR Daling;J. Thomas Grayston

  • Immunotyping of Chlamydia trachomatis with Monoclonal Antibodies

    San-pin Wang;Cho-chou Kuo;Robert C. Barnes;Richard S. Stephens

  • Etiology of nongonococcal urethritis. Evidence for Chlamydia trachomatis and Ureaplasma urealyticum.

    W R Bowie;S P Wang;E R Alexander;J Floyd

  • Seroepidemiology of Chlamydia pneumoniae TWAR Infection in Seattle Families, 1966-1979

    M. B. Aldous;J. T. Grayston;San-Pin Wang;H. M. Foy

  • Confirmed Previous Infection With Chlamydia pneumoniae (TWAR) and Its Presence in Early Coronary Atherosclerosis

    Michael Davidson;Cho Chou Kuo;John P. Middaugh;Lee Ann Campbell

  • Chlamydia pneumoniae, Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1, and Cytomegalovirus and Incident Myocardial Infarction and Coronary Heart Disease Death in Older Adults The Cardiovascular Health Study

    D S Siscovick;S M Schwartz;L Corey;J T Grayston

Frequent Co-Authors

Cho-Chou Kuo
Cho-Chou Kuo University of Washington
King K. Holmes
King K. Holmes University of Washington
Lee Ann Campbell
Lee Ann Campbell University of Washington
J. T. Grayston
J. T. Grayston University of Washington
Walter E. Stamm
Walter E. Stamm University of Washington
Janet R. Daling
Janet R. Daling Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
George E. Kenny
George E. Kenny University of Washington
Lisa A. Jackson
Lisa A. Jackson Kaiser Permanente
Eben Alexander
Eben Alexander Brigham and Women's Hospital
Noel S. Weiss
Noel S. Weiss University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students pursuing Microbiology in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career opportunities. Fields like health information management offer promising alternatives that intersect with healthcare and data science. Understanding the health information management jobs salary can help guide educational choices toward financially rewarding paths.

Choosing the right program is crucial. Prospective students should consider enrolling in best online health information management degree cahiim accredited programs, as accreditation ensures quality education aligned with industry standards. These programs often provide flexibility for students balancing work and study.

For those interested in quicker certification options, online medical billing and coding certificate fast programs offer accelerated pathways to enter the healthcare administration sector without a lengthy commitment.

Additionally, there are numerous online healthcare programs available that cater to various interests within the healthcare domain, providing students with flexibility and broadening the scope of potential careers beyond traditional laboratory roles.

Best Scientists Citing San-Pin Wang

Recently Published Articles