World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
106
Citations
54699
World Ranking
6403
National Ranking
3411

Robert A. Wolfe publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert A. Wolfe sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 252 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Robert A. Wolfe D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert A. Wolfe sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 106 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2003 - Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA)

Overview

Robert A. Wolfe is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their academic contributions span several years, and they have been recognized by their professional community through awards.

In 2003, Robert A. Wolfe was named a Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA), a distinction that recognizes significant contributions to the field of statistics.

While specific details about their publications, frequent co-authors, and research topics are not provided, their association with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor situates them in a significant research environment in the United States.

Data on recent papers, publication venues, book publications, main fields, subfields, and main topics of work are not available for this scientist. Consequently, an outline of research areas or detailed bibliographic information cannot be presented.

Best Publications

  • Comparison of Mortality in All Patients on Dialysis, Patients on Dialysis Awaiting Transplantation, and Recipients of a First Cadaveric Transplant

    Robert A. Wolfe;Valarie B. Ashby;Edgar L. Milford;Akinlolu O. Ojo

  • Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and allocation of donor livers

    Russell Wiesner;Erick Edwards;Richard Freeman;Ann Harper

  • Chronic renal failure after transplantation of a nonrenal organ.

    Akinlolu O. Ojo;Philip J. Held;Friedrich K. Port;Robert A. Wolfe

  • Spectrum of cancer risk among US solid organ transplant recipients.

    Eric A. Engels;Ruth M. Pfeiffer;Joseph F. Fraumeni;Bertram L. Kasiske

  • Delayed graft function: risk factors and implications for renal allograft survival.

    Akinlolu O. Ojo;Robert A. Wolfe;Philip J. Held;Friedrich K. Port

  • VASCULAR ACCESS USE IN EUROPE AND THE UNITED STATES: RESULTS FROM THE DOPPS

    Ronald L. Pisoni;Eric W. Young;Dawn M. Dykstra;Roger N. Greenwood

  • Health-related quality of life as a predictor of mortality and hospitalization: the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS).

    Donna L. Mapes;Antonio Alberto Lopes;Sudtida Satayathum;Keith P. Mccullough

  • Survival in Recipients of Marginal Cadaveric Donor Kidneys Compared with Other Recipients and Wait-Listed Transplant Candidates

    Akinlolu O. Ojo;Julie A. Hanson;Herwig-Ulf Meier-Kriesche;Chike N. Okechukwu

  • Comparison of Survival Probabilities for Dialysis Patients vs Cadaveric Renal Transplant Recipients

    Friedrich K. Port;Robert A. Wolfe;Elizabeth A. Mauger;Donald P. Berling

  • Long-term survival in renal transplant recipients with graft function.

    Akinlolu O. Ojo;Julie A. Hanson;Robert A. Wolfe;Alan B. Leichtman

  • A comprehensive risk quantification score for deceased donor kidneys: the kidney donor risk index.

    Panduranga S. Rao;Douglas E. Schaubel;Mary K. Guidinger;Kenneth A. Andreoni

  • The survival benefit of liver transplantation.

    Robert M. Merion;Douglas E. Schaubel;Dawn M. Dykstra;Richard B. Freeman

  • Association of Comorbid Conditions and Mortality in Hemodialysis Patients in Europe, Japan, and the United States: The Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS)

    David A. Goodkin;Jennifer L. Bragg-Gresham;Karl G. Koenig;Robert A. Wolfe

  • The new liver allocation system: Moving toward evidence‐based transplantation policy

    Richard B. Freeman;Russell H. Wiesner;Ann Harper;Sue V. McDiarmid

  • Donor characteristics associated with reduced graft survival: an approach to expanding the pool of kidney donors.

    Friedrich K. Port;Jennifer L. Bragg-Gresham;Robert A. Metzger;Dawn M. Dykstra

  • Deceased-donor characteristics and the survival benefit of kidney transplantation.

    Robert M. Merion;Valarie B. Ashby;Robert A. Wolfe;Dale A. Distant

  • The dose of hemodialysis and patient mortality

    Philip J. Held;Friedrich K. Port;Robert A. Wolfe;David C. Stannard

  • Disparities in Incidence of Diabetic End-Stage Renal Disease According to Race and Type of Diabetes

    Catherine C. Cowie;Friedrich K. Port;Robert A. Wolfe;Peter J. Savage

  • Predictors of Loss of Residual Renal Function among New Dialysis Patients

    Louise M. Moist;Friedrich K. Port;Sean M. Orzol;Eric W. Young

  • Predialysis blood pressure and mortality risk in a national sample of maintenance hemodialysis patients.

    Friedrich K. Port;Tempie E. Hulbert-Shearon;Robert A. Wolfe;Wendy E. Bloembergen

Frequent Co-Authors

Friedrich K. Port
Friedrich K. Port University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Philip J. Held
Philip J. Held University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Lawrence Y. Agodoa
Lawrence Y. Agodoa National Institutes of Health
Akinlolu O. Ojo
Akinlolu O. Ojo University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Robert M. Merion
Robert M. Merion University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Ronald L. Pisoni
Ronald L. Pisoni Arbor Research Collaborative for Health
Brenda W. Gillespie
Brenda W. Gillespie University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Nathan W. Levin
Nathan W. Levin Mount Sinai Beth Israel
Richard A. Hirth
Richard A. Hirth University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
J. Richard Landis
J. Richard Landis University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens the door to a wide range of complementary online degree options and career pathways. For students interested in preventative health and wellbeing, there are nutrition degrees online that provide flexible learning and specialized skills in dietary science.

Those looking to advance their leadership skills within healthcare should consider which online healthcare degree programs are recognized for their accreditation by cahme?. Accreditation ensures your qualification is respected and meets rigorous industry standards.

Registered Nurses (RNs) aiming to earn a bachelor’s degree in nursing can benefit from the best online rn to bsn programs without clinical requirements. These programs allow experienced nurses to advance their credentials with minimal disruption to their work schedules.

For ambitious nurses seeking the highest clinical practice degree, the 1 year dnp program online offers a fast-tracked route to a Doctor of Nursing Practice. These accelerated options can help you meet growing industry demands for advanced practitioners.

Best Scientists Citing Robert A. Wolfe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles