World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
81
Citations
27331
World Ranking
1558
National Ranking
770

Richard Paylor publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Paylor sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 122 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Richard Paylor D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Paylor sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard Paylor was affiliated with Baylor College of Medicine in the United States. Their scientific career encompassed various aspects of academic research, centered on their institutional connection with this prominent medical research center.

There are no recorded recent publications or listed research papers authored by Richard Paylor in the available data. Similarly, detailed records of frequent co-authors, or specific publication venues where they commonly published, are not documented.

Information about main fields of study, subfields of study, and main topics of work related to Richard Paylor's research is also not available. This limits the understanding of the precise scientific domains or themes on which they focused.

The absence of documented book publications means there is no available record of scholarly books or monographs published by this scientist through known publishers.

There is no information indicating that Richard Paylor received specific awards during their career.

Despite the limited data, the verified link to Baylor College of Medicine situates Richard Paylor's career within a medically oriented academic context in the United States. Their contributions would have been framed by the scientific environment and research priorities of that institution.

Best Publications

  • Atm-deficient mice: a paradigm of ataxia telangiectasia.

    Carrolee Barlow;Shinji Hirotsune;Richard Paylor;Marek Liyanage

  • Impaired spatial learning in alpha-calcium-calmodulin kinase II mutant mice

    Alcino J. Silva;Richard Paylor;Jeanne M. Wehner;Susumu Tonegawa;Susumu Tonegawa

  • Behavioral phenotypes of inbred mouse strains: implications and recommendations for molecular studies.

    Jacqueline N. Crawley;John K. Belknap;Allan Collins;John C. Crabbe

  • Synaptic Vesicle Depletion Correlates with Attenuated Synaptic Responses to Prolonged Repetitive Stimulation in Mice Lacking α-Synuclein

    Deborah E. Cabin;Kazuhiro Shimazu;Diane Murphy;Nelson B. Cole

  • Mice with Truncated MeCP2 Recapitulate Many Rett Syndrome Features and Display Hyperacetylation of Histone H3

    Mona D. Shahbazian;Juan I. Young;Lisa A. Yuva-Paylor;Corinne M. Spencer

  • Marble burying reflects a repetitive and perseverative behavior more than novelty-induced anxiety

    Alexia Thomas;April Burant;Nghiem Bui;Deanna Graham

  • A Proposed Test Battery and Constellations of Specific Behavioral Paradigms to Investigate the Behavioral Phenotypes of Transgenic and Knockout Mice

    Jacqueline N. Crawley;Richard Paylor

  • The use of behavioral test batteries: effects of training history.

    Kellie L McIlwain;Michelle Y Merriweather;Lisa A Yuva-Paylor;Richard Paylor

  • PKCγ mutant mice exhibit mild deficits in spatial and contextual learning

    Asa Abeliovich;Richard Paylor;Chong Chen;Jeansok J. Kim

  • Histone Methylation Regulates Memory Formation

    Unknown

  • Inbred strain differences in prepulse inhibition of the mouse startle response

    Richard Paylor;Jacqueline Crawley

  • Social Interaction and Sensorimotor Gating Abnormalities in Mice Lacking Dvl1

    Nardos Lijam;Richard Paylor;Michael P. McDonald;Jacqueline N. Crawley

  • Dynamic Translational and Proteasomal Regulation of Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein Controls mGluR-Dependent Long-Term Depression

    Lingfei Hou;Marcia D. Antion;Daoying Hu;Corinne M. Spencer

  • Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome type 7 (HPS-7) results from mutant dysbindin, a member of the biogenesis of lysosome-related organelles complex 1 (BLOC-1).

    Wei Li;Qing Zhang;Naoki Oiso;Edward K Novak

  • Altered anxiety-related and social behaviors in the Fmr1 knockout mouse model of fragile X syndrome.

    C. M. Spencer;O. Alekseyenko;E. Serysheva;L. A. Yuva-Paylor

  • Hippocampal lesions cause learning deficits in inbred mice in the Morris water maze and conditioned-fear task.

    Sheree F. Logue;Richard Paylor;Jeanne M. Wehner

  • A necessity for MAP kinase activation in mammalian spatial learning.

    Joel C. Selcher;Coleen M. Atkins;James M. Trzaskos;Richard Paylor;Richard Paylor

  • α7 Nicotinic Receptor Subunits Are Not Necessary for Hippocampal-Dependent Learning or Sensorimotor Gating: A Behavioral Characterization of Acra7-Deficient Mice

    Richard Paylor;Michelle Nguyen;Jacqueline N. Crawley;James Patrick

  • Mouse genetic models for prepulse inhibition: an early review.

    M A Geyer;K L McIlwain;R Paylor

  • (Over)correction of FMR1 deficiency with YAC transgenics: behavioral and physical features

    Andrea M. Peier;Kellie L. McIlwain;Aileen Kenneson;Stephen T. Warren

  • The stress-induced hyperthermia paradigm as a physiological animal model for anxiety: a review of pharmacological and genetic studies in the mouse.

    J. Adriaan Bouwknecht;Berend Olivier;Berend Olivier;Richard E. Paylor

  • Abnormalities of social interactions and home-cage behavior in a mouse model of Rett syndrome

    Paolo Moretti;J. Adriaan Bouwknecht;Ryan Teague;Richard Paylor

Frequent Co-Authors

Berend Olivier
Berend Olivier Utrecht University
James R. Lupski
James R. Lupski Baylor College of Medicine
David L. Nelson
David L. Nelson Baylor College of Medicine
J. David Sweatt
J. David Sweatt University of Alabama at Birmingham
Huda Y. Zoghbi
Huda Y. Zoghbi Baylor College of Medicine
Anthony Wynshaw-Boris
Anthony Wynshaw-Boris Case Western Reserve University
Edwin J. Weeber
Edwin J. Weeber University of South Florida
Eric Klann
Eric Klann New York University
Jacqueline N. Crawley
Jacqueline N. Crawley University of California, Davis
Ben A. Oostra
Ben A. Oostra Erasmus University Rotterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Richard Paylor

Recently Published Articles