What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Composite material
- Thermodynamics
- Electron
Richard G. Hoagland focuses on Composite material, Slip, Dislocation, Niobium and Metallurgy.
His Composite material research focuses on Nanoscopic scale and how it connects with Transmission electron microscopy.
His Slip research integrates issues from Composite number, Collision cascade, Metal and Atomic simulation.
His Dislocation study deals with the bigger picture of Crystallography.
His Niobium research incorporates themes from Volume fraction, Damage tolerance, Radiation damage and Copper.
His Radiation damage study combines topics in areas such as Chemical physics, Activation energy, Grain boundary, Annealing and Microsecond.
His most cited work include:
- Length-scale-dependent deformation mechanisms in incoherent metallic multilayered composites (706 citations)
- Efficient annealing of radiation damage near grain boundaries via interstitial emission. (672 citations)
- Interface Structure and Radiation Damage Resistance in Cu-Nb Multilayer Nanocomposites (396 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary scientific interests are in Composite material, Dislocation, Condensed matter physics, Crystallography and Slip.
His Composite material study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Nanoscopic scale and Metal.
His work in Dislocation tackles topics such as Crystallographic defect which are related to areas like Radiation damage and Vacancy defect.
In his study, Tilt is strongly linked to Grain boundary, which falls under the umbrella field of Condensed matter physics.
He interconnects Layer, Transmission electron microscopy and Nucleation in the investigation of issues within Crystallography.
Richard G. Hoagland combines subjects such as Ultimate tensile strength, Plasticity, Stress field, Deformation mechanism and Peierls stress with his study of Slip.
He most often published in these fields:
- Composite material (39.44%)
- Dislocation (36.62%)
- Condensed matter physics (35.21%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2011-2020)?
- Condensed matter physics (35.21%)
- Dislocation (36.62%)
- Crystallography (30.28%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Condensed matter physics, Dislocation, Crystallography, Interface and Grain boundary.
His research in Condensed matter physics intersects with topics in Volume fraction and Modulus.
His work carried out in the field of Dislocation brings together such families of science as Crystallographic defect and Line.
His study in Crystallography concentrates on Slip and Stacking fault.
His work focuses on many connections between Tin and other disciplines, such as Diffraction, that overlap with his field of interest in Composite material.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Niobium and Thin film.
Between 2011 and 2020, his most popular works were:
- Interface defects, reference spaces and the Frank–Bilby equation (156 citations)
- Slip transmission across fcc/bcc interfaces with varying interface shear strengths (87 citations)
- Role of atomic structure on grain boundary-defect interactions in Cu (82 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Composite material
- Thermodynamics
- Electron
Richard G. Hoagland spends much of his time researching Condensed matter physics, Crystallography, Crystallographic defect, Dislocation and Twist.
His works in Slip and Stacking fault are all subjects of inquiry into Crystallography.
His work deals with themes such as Nanoscopic scale, Shear, Atom, Molecular physics and Tin, which intersect with Slip.
His studies in Crystallographic defect integrate themes in fields like Line and Deformation.
In most of his Dislocation studies, his work intersects topics such as Relaxation.
His Twist research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Basis, Thermal conductivity, Grain boundary, Boundary structure and Phonon.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
