World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen

Award Badge
Political Science
Denmark
2026
Award Badge
Political Science
UK
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Political Science 53 183 160 5 5 181 12628

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rasmus Kleis Nielsen between 2004 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rasmus Kleis Nielsen published across 23 years, from 2004 to 2026, averaging 9.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2020. 6 of the 218 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2020. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 0 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 27 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 22 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 3 publications 2026: 3 publications
2004 2026

218 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen: publications per year, 2004 to 2026
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 0
2006 1
2007 0
2008 0
2009 2
2010 3
2011 2
2012 21
2013 18
2014 19
2015 15
2016 17
2017 13
2018 11
2019 10
2020 27
2021 12
2022 12
2023 22
2024 6
2025 3
2026 3
Total 218
Download as CSV

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rasmus Kleis Nielsen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
20 40 60 80
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 333+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 97. Most scientists, 97, have 333+ publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–185 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36–40 publications 333+

This scientist: 181 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 10
41–45 11
46–50 25
51–55 27
56–60 44
61–65 52
66–70 62
71–75 62
76–80 79
81–85 71
86–90 82
91–95 65
96–100 85
101–105 76
106–110 66
111–115 78
116–120 67
121–125 73
126–130 73
131–135 64
136–140 45
141–145 53
146–150 44
151–155 45
156–160 33
161–165 32
166–170 28
171–175 31
176–180 29
181–185 27 181
186–190 36
191–195 27
196–200 24
201–205 16
206–210 16
211–215 19
216–220 16
221–225 17
226–230 18
231–235 23
236–240 17
241–245 13
246–250 17
251–255 9
256–260 13
261–265 8
266–270 12
271–275 8
276–280 10
281–285 13
286–290 13
291–295 5
296–300 6
301–305 11
306–310 9
311–315 6
316–320 4
321–325 4
326–330 2
331–332 5
333+ 97
Download as CSV

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rasmus Kleis Nielsen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 43 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 62+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 100. Most scientists, 100, have 62+ D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 76
21 79
22 84
23 68
24 88
25 82
26 76
27 75
28 99
29 96
30 96
31 81
32 86
33 81
34 84
35 72
36 58
37 53
38 48
39 40
40 40
41 32
42 26
43 25
44 33
45 33
46 17
47 21
48 22
49 18
50 19
51 19
52 15
53 14 53
54 10
55 13
56 9
57 11
58 12
59 10
60 5
61 7
62+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Political Science in Denmark Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Political Science in United Kingdom Leader Award

Overview

Rasmus Kleis Nielsen is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research predominantly spans the social sciences, with a particular focus on communication, sociology and political science, economics and econometrics, artificial intelligence, and literature and literary theory.

The main research topics covered by Nielsen's work include social media and politics, misinformation and its impacts, media studies and communication, media influence and politics, COVID-19 pandemic impacts, hate speech and cyberbullying detection, and media influence and health.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Nielsen are:

  • Richard Fletcher
  • Benjamin Toff
  • Ruth Palmer
  • Antonis Kalogeropoulos
  • Camila Mont'Alverne

Nielsen has contributed to a variety of publication venues, including:

  • Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)
  • Journalism Studies
  • The International Journal of Press/Politics
  • Journal of Quantitative Description Digital Media
  • New Media & Society

The recent papers authored by Nielsen cover significant current topics:

  • Reuters Institute digital news report 2020, 2023, SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Beyond (Mis)Representation: Visuals in COVID-19 Misinformation, 2020, The International Journal of Press/Politics
  • Exposure to news grows less fragmented with an increase in mobile access, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Quantifying the "infodemic": People turned to trustworthy news outlets during the 2020 coronavirus pandemic, 2022, Journal of Quantitative Description Digital Media
  • "The Media Covers Up a Lot of Things": Watchdog Ideals Meet Folk Theories of Journalism, 2020, Journalism Studies

Regarding book publications, Nielsen has authored titles published by notable academic presses:

  • Social Media and Democracy, Cambridge University Press, 2020
  • The Power of Platforms, Oxford University Press, 2022
  • Avoiding the News, Columbia University Press, 2023

Best Publications

  • Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2015

    Nic Newman;David A. L. Levy;Rasmus Kleis Nielsen

  • Types, sources, and claims of COVID-19 misinformation

    JS Brennen;FM Simon;PN Howard;RK Nielsen

  • Are people incidentally exposed to news on social media? A comparative analysis:

    Richard Fletcher;Rasmus Kleis Nielsen

  • Reuters Institute digital news report 2019

    Nic Newman;Richard Fletcher;Antonis Kalogeropoulos;Antonis Kalogeropoulos;Rasmus Kleis Nielsen

  • Dealing with digital intermediaries: A case study of the relations between publishers and platforms:

    Rasmus Kleis Nielsen;Sarah Anne Ganter

  • Are News Audiences Increasingly Fragmented? A Cross-National Comparative Analysis of Cross-Platform News Audience Fragmentation and Duplication

    Richard Fletcher;Rasmus Kleis Nielsen

  • Ground Wars: Personalized Communication in Political Campaigns

    Rasmus Kleis Nielsen

  • "News you don't believe": Audience perspectives on fake news

    RK Nielsen;L Graves

  • Reuters Institute digital news report 2020

    N Newman;R Fletcher;A Schultz;S Andi

  • The Relative Importance of Social Media for Accessing, Finding, and Engaging with News

    Rasmus Kleis Nielsen;Kim Christian Schrøder

  • Measuring the reach of “fake news” and online disinformation in Europe

    RK Nielsen;R Fletcher;A Cornia;L Graves

  • The Power of Platforms

    Unknown

  • Survival is success: journalistic online start-ups in Western Europe

    Nicola Bruno;Rasmus Kleis Nielsen

  • LOCAL JOURNALISM THE DECLINE OF NEWSPAPERS AND THE RISE OF DIGITAL MEDIA

    Rasmus Kleis Nielsen

  • “I Just Google It”: Folk Theories of Distributed Discovery

    Benjamin J Toff;Benjamin J Toff;Rasmus Kleis Nielsen

  • Reuters Institute digital news report 2017

    Nic Newman;Richard Fletcher;Antonis Kalogeropoulos;Antonis Kalogeropoulos;David A. L. Levy

  • Who Shares and Comments on News?: A Cross-National Comparative Analysis of Online and Social Media Participation

    Antonis Kalogeropoulos;Samuel Negredo;Ike Picone;Rasmus Kleis Nielsen

  • Editorial analytics: How news media are developing and using audience data and metrics

    Federica Cherubini;Rasmus Kleis Nielsen

  • How Polarized Are Online and Offline News Audiences? A Comparative Analysis of Twelve Countries:

    Richard Fletcher;Alessio Cornia;Alessio Cornia;Rasmus Kleis Nielsen

  • Do People “Like” Politicians on Facebook? Not really. Large-Scale Direct Candidate-to-Voter Online Communication as an Outlier Phenomenon

    Rasmus Kleis Nielsen;Cristian Vaccari

  • Reuters Institute digital news report 2016

    Nic Newman;Richard Fletcher;David A. L. Levy;Rasmus Kleis Nielsen

  • Generalised scepticism: how people navigate news on social media

    Richard Fletcher;Rasmus Kleis Nielsen

  • HOW NEWSPAPERS BEGAN TO BLOG: Recognizing the role of technologists in old media organizations’ development of new media technologies

    Rasmus Kleis Nielsen

  • Beyond (Mis)Representation: Visuals in COVID-19 Misinformation

    J. Scott Brennen;Felix M. Simon;Rasmus Kleis Nielsen

  • Paying for Online News

    Richard Fletcher;Rasmus Kleis Nielsen

  • What Drives Politicians' Online Popularity? An Analysis of the 2010 U.S. Midterm Elections

    Rasmus Kleis Nielsen;Cristian Vaccari

  • Qualitative Political Communication| Introduction ~ The Role of Qualitative Methods in Political Communication Research: Past, Present, and Future

    David Karpf;Daniel Kreiss;Rasmus Kleis Nielsen;Matthew Powers

  • Automated Serendipity: The effect of using search engines on news repertoire balance and diversity

    Richard Fletcher;Rasmus Kleis Nielsen

Frequent Co-Authors

Cristian Vaccari
Cristian Vaccari University of Edinburgh
Sandra González-Bailón
Sandra González-Bailón University of Pennsylvania
Daniel Kreiss
Daniel Kreiss University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Frank Esser
Frank Esser University of Zurich
Philip N. Howard
Philip N. Howard University of Oxford
Jørgen Goul Andersen
Jørgen Goul Andersen Aalborg University
Katherine Richardson
Katherine Richardson University of Copenhagen
Mette Morsing
Mette Morsing University of Oxford
Torben M. Andersen
Torben M. Andersen Aarhus University
Peter Birch Sørensen
Peter Birch Sørensen University of Copenhagen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online education offers political science students flexible and convenient ways to further their studies or broaden their career prospects. Many choose to complement their major with courses from other fields, or pursue graduate education through the shortest masters degree programs. These accelerated pathways help professionals enter the workforce faster or shift to higher-level roles without long campus commitments.

Budget-conscious learners can benefit from cheap online college classes that are offered by accredited institutions. These options make it easier to finish required coursework or explore electives in subjects like public policy, economics, or law—without accumulating excessive debt.

Political science frequently overlaps with other fields. You may wish to explore jobs for environmental science majors or learn skills through accredited online college math courses that strengthen your analytical abilities. These interdisciplinary skills can lead to diverse roles in government, advocacy, analysis, and more—all available through convenient online study.

Best Scientists Citing Rasmus Kleis Nielsen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles