World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Rising Stars
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Rising Stars 39 677 677 101 101 107 27439
Computer Science 43 7728 7505 3336 3209 103 30451

Pranav Rajpurkar publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Pranav Rajpurkar between 2015 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Pranav Rajpurkar published across 11 years, from 2015 to 2025, averaging 16.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 36 publications in 2025. 65 of the 181 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2015 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 36. Peak 36 publications in 2025. 2015: 3 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 28 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 31 publications 2024: 29 publications 2025: 36 publications
2015 2025

181 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Pranav Rajpurkar: publications per year, 2015 to 2025
Year Publications
2015 3
2016 2
2017 4
2018 3
2019 12
2020 16
2021 28
2022 17
2023 31
2024 29
2025 36
Total 181
Download as CSV

Pranav Rajpurkar publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pranav Rajpurkar sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 102–111 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 103 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420 103
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Pranav Rajpurkar D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pranav Rajpurkar sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821 43
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Rising Stars Award

Overview

Pranav Rajpurkar is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their research intersects primarily with the fields of Medicine and Computer Science, contributing to a diverse range of topics and subfields.

The scientist's main areas of study include:

  • Medicine
  • Computer Science

In terms of subfields, their work focuses on:

  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Health Informatics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

The primary research topics covered by Pranav Rajpurkar are:

  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • AI in cancer detection
  • Topic Modeling
  • Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques

Publication venues frequently featuring their work include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • npj Digital Medicine
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Biomedical Engineering
  • Nature Medicine

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Pranav Rajpurkar are:

  • AI in health and medicine, 2022, Nature Medicine
  • Foundation models for generalist medical artificial intelligence, 2023, Nature
  • Multimodal biomedical AI, 2022, Nature Medicine
  • Self-supervised learning in medicine and healthcare, 2022, Nature Biomedical Engineering
  • The Current and Future State of AI Interpretation of Medical Images, 2023, New England Journal of Medicine

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Andrew Y. Ng
  • Matthew P. Lungren
  • Oishi Banerjee
  • Eric J. Topol
  • Julián Acosta

Best Publications

  • SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text

    Pranav Rajpurkar;Jian Zhang;Konstantin Lopyrev;Percy Liang

  • Cardiologist-Level Arrhythmia Detection and Classification in Ambulatory Electrocardiograms Using a Deep Neural Network

    Awni Y. Hannun;Pranav Rajpurkar;Masoumeh Haghpanahi;Geoffrey H. Tison

  • Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuAD

    Pranav Rajpurkar;Robin Jia;Percy Liang

  • CheXpert: A large chest radiograph dataset with uncertainty labels and expert comparison

    Jeremy Irvin;Pranav Rajpurkar;Michael Ko;Yifan Yu

  • CheXNet: Radiologist-Level Pneumonia Detection on Chest X-Rays with Deep Learning

    Pranav Rajpurkar;Jeremy Irvin;Kaylie Zhu;Brandon Yang

  • Deep learning for chest radiograph diagnosis: A retrospective comparison of the CheXNeXt algorithm to practicing radiologists

    Pranav Rajpurkar;Jeremy Irvin;Robyn L. Ball;Kaylie Zhu

  • Cardiologist-Level Arrhythmia Detection with Convolutional Neural Networks

    Pranav Rajpurkar;Awni Y. Hannun;Masoumeh Haghpanahi;Codie Bourn

  • An Empirical Evaluation of Deep Learning on Highway Driving

    Brody Huval;Tao Wang;Sameep Tandon;Jeff Kiske

  • Impact of a deep learning assistant on the histopathologic classification of liver cancer.

    Amirhossein Kiani;Bora Uyumazturk;Pranav Rajpurkar;Alex Wang

  • MURA: Large Dataset for Abnormality Detection in Musculoskeletal Radiographs.

    Pranav Rajpurkar;Jeremy Irvin;Aarti Bagul;Daisy Ding

  • Deep Learning-Assisted Diagnosis of Cerebral Aneurysms Using the HeadXNet Model

    Allison Park;Chris Chute;Pranav Rajpurkar;Joe Lou

  • Human-machine partnership with artificial intelligence for chest radiograph diagnosis.

    Bhavik N. Patel;Louis Rosenberg;Gregg Willcox;David Baltaxe

  • Combining Automatic Labelers and Expert Annotations for Accurate Radiology Report Labeling Using BERT

    Akshay Smit;Saahil Jain;Pranav Rajpurkar;Anuj Pareek

  • PENet-a scalable deep-learning model for automated diagnosis of pulmonary embolism using volumetric CT imaging.

    Shih Cheng Huang;Tanay Kothari;Imon Banerjee;Chris Chute

  • Automated coronary calcium scoring using deep learning with multicenter external validation

    David Eng;Christopher Chute;Nishith Khandwala;Pranav Rajpurkar

  • AppendiXNet: Deep Learning for Diagnosis of Appendicitis from A Small Dataset of CT Exams Using Video Pretraining.

    Pranav Rajpurkar;Allison Park;Jeremy Irvin;Chris Chute

  • CheXaid: deep learning assistance for physician diagnosis of tuberculosis using chest x-rays in patients with HIV.

    Pranav Rajpurkar;Chloe O'Connell;Amit Schechter;Nishit Asnani

  • RadGraph: Extracting Clinical Entities and Relations from Radiology Reports

    Saahil Jain;Ashwin Agrawal;Adriel Saporta;Steven Q. H. Truong

  • CheXtransfer: performance and parameter efficiency of ImageNet models for chest X-Ray interpretation

    Alexander Ke;William Ellsworth;Oishi Banerjee;Andrew Y. Ng

  • MoCo-CXR: MoCo Pretraining Improves Representation and Transferability of Chest X-ray Models

    Hari Sowrirajan;Jingbo Yang;Andrew Y. Ng;Pranav Rajpurkar

  • CheXbert: Combining Automatic Labelers and Expert Annotations for Accurate Radiology Report Labeling Using BERT

    Akshay Smit;Saahil Jain;Pranav Rajpurkar;Anuj Pareek

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew Y. Ng
Andrew Y. Ng Stanford University
Christopher G. Chute
Christopher G. Chute Johns Hopkins University
Sanjay Basu
Sanjay Basu Stanford University
Percy Liang
Percy Liang Stanford University
Michael S. Bernstein
Michael S. Bernstein Stanford University
Tao Wang
Tao Wang Stanford University
Nigam H. Shah
Nigam H. Shah Stanford University
William L. Ellsworth
William L. Ellsworth Stanford University
Gerald J. Berry
Gerald J. Berry Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens up diverse academic and professional opportunities. Many students consider flexible online options for further studies, both to advance their careers and to accommodate work and life commitments.

For those interested in leadership roles within technology organizations, pursuing an online executive MBA can strengthen business acumen and management skills. Others may look into specialized fields, such as a mlis (Master’s in Library and Information Science), ideal for blending computing with information management.

Affordability matters to many prospective students. There are many cheapest online masters programs across tech disciplines, enabling graduates to upskill without taking on significant debt. For advanced leadership roles, a doctorate in leadership can qualify you for high-level executive or academic positions.

No matter your career path, these related online degrees offer a flexible and cost-effective way to deepen your knowledge and expand your professional options in computer science and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Pranav Rajpurkar

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles