World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
49
Citations
8897
World Ranking
5978
National Ranking
2616

Peter Shrager publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Shrager sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 85 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Peter Shrager D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Shrager sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Shrager is affiliated with the University of Rochester Medical Center in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on biochemical, genetic, and molecular biology aspects related to neuroscience.

The scientist's recent research output covers various topics including mitochondrial function and pathology, microtubule and mitosis dynamics, nerve injury and regeneration, neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms, retinal development and disorders, protein tyrosine phosphatases, and signaling pathways in disease.

  • Nuclear Inhibitor of Protein Phosphatase 1 (NIPP1) Regulates CNS Tau Phosphorylation and Myelination During Development, 2022, Molecular Neurobiology
  • BclXL (Bcl2l1) gene therapy lessens retinal ganglion cell soma loss but not axonal degeneration after acute axonal injury, 2022, Cell Death Discovery
  • Sarm1 is not necessary for activation of neuron-intrinsic growth programs yet required for the Schwann cell repair response and peripheral nerve regeneration, 2024, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • MKK4 and MKK7 control degeneration of retinal ganglion cell somas and axons after glaucoma-relevant injury, 2024, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Deletion of murine Sarm1 results in a microenvironment that delays peripheral nerve regeneration after injury, 2025, Science Translational Medicine

Shrager's research has frequently appeared in the venue bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), with four publications. Other publications include Molecular Neurobiology, Cell Death Discovery, and Science Translational Medicine.

The scientist has collaborated frequently with colleagues Cody McKee, Karl Foley, Houhui Xia, Olivia J. Marola, and Richard T. Libby, each contributing to multiple projects alongside Shrager.

Main fields of study include Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Neuroscience. Specific subfields encompass Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Developmental Neuroscience, and Neurology.

Best Publications

  • Neuregulin-1 type III determines the ensheathment fate of axons.

    Carla Taveggia;George Zanazzi;Ashley Petrylak;Hiroko Yano

  • Caspr2, a New Member of the Neurexin Superfamily, Is Localized at the Juxtaparanodes of Myelinated Axons and Associates with K+ Channels

    Sebastian Poliak;Leora Gollan;Ricardo Martinez;Andrew Custer

  • Juxtaparanodal clustering of Shaker-like K+ channels in myelinated axons depends on Caspr2 and TAG-1

    Sebastian Poliak;Daniela Salomon;Hadas Elhanany;Helena Sabanay

  • Dependence of Nodal Sodium Channel Clustering on Paranodal Axoglial Contact in the Developing CNS

    Matthew N. Rasband;Elior Peles;James S. Trimmer;S. Rock Levinson

  • Potassium Channel Distribution, Clustering, and Function in Remyelinating Rat Axons

    Matthew N. Rasband;James S. Trimmer;Thomas L. Schwarz;S. Rock Levinson

  • Mice Lacking Sodium Channel β1 Subunits Display Defects in Neuronal Excitability, Sodium Channel Expression, and Nodal Architecture

    Chunling Chen;Ruth E. Westenbroek;Xiaorong Xu;Chris A. Edwards

  • Mice deficient for tenascin-R display alterations of the extracellular matrix and decreased axonal conduction velocities in the CNS.

    P Weber;U Bartsch;U Bartsch;M N Rasband;R Czaniera

  • Neurofascin assembles a specialized extracellular matrix at the axon initial segment

    Kristian L. Hedstrom;Xiaorong Xu;Yasuhiro Ogawa;Renato Frischknecht

  • Clustering of Na+ channels and node of Ranvier formation in remyelinating axons

    S Dugandzija-Novakovic;AG Koszowski;SR Levinson;P Shrager

  • Reduced sodium channel density, altered voltage dependence of inactivation, and increased susceptibility to seizures in mice lacking sodium channel β2-subunits

    Chunling Chen;Vandana Bharucha;Vandana Bharucha;Yuan Chen;Ruth E. Westenbroek

  • Contactin Associates with Na+ Channels and Increases Their Functional Expression

    Katie Kazarinova-Noyes;Jyoti Dhar Malhotra;Dyke P. McEwen;Laura N. Mattei

  • The Clustering of Axonal Sodium Channels during Development of the Peripheral Nervous System

    Ian Vabnick;Sanja D. Novaković;S. Rock Levinson;Melitta Schachner

  • A glial signal consisting of Gliomedin and NrCAM clusters axonal Na+ channels during the formation of nodes of Ranvier

    Konstantin Feinberg;Yael Eshed-Eisenbach;Shahar Frechter;Veronique Amor

  • DYNAMIC POTASSIUM CHANNEL DISTRIBUTIONS DURING AXONAL DEVELOPMENT PREVENT ABERRANT FIRING PATTERNS

    Ian Vabnick;James S. Trimmer;Thomas L. Schwarz;S. Rock Levinson

  • Synaptic function for the Nogo-66 receptor NgR1: regulation of dendritic spine morphology and activity-dependent synaptic strength.

    Hakjoo Lee;Stephen J. Raiker;Karthik Venkatesh;Karthik Venkatesh;Rebecca Geary

  • Oligodendrocyte-Myelin Glycoprotein and Nogo Negatively Regulate Activity-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity

    Stephen J. Raiker;Hakjoo Lee;Katherine T. Baldwin;Yuntao Duan

  • Voltage-dependent sodium and potassium channels in mammalian cultured Schwann cells.

    P Shrager;S Y Chiu;J M Ritchie

  • K+ channel distribution and clustering in developing and hypomyelinated axons of the optic nerve.

    Matthew N. Rasband;James S. Trimmer;Elior Peles;S. Rock Levinson

  • Ion channel sequestration in central nervous system axons

    Matthew N. Rasband;Peter Shrager

  • No Obvious Abnormality in Mice Deficient in Receptor Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase β

    S. Harroch;M. Palmeri;J. Rosenbluth;A. Custer

  • ION CHANNEL REDISTRIBUTION AND FUNCTION DURING DEVELOPMENT OF THE MYELINATED AXON

    Ian Vabnick;Peter Shrager

  • Sodium channels in single demyelinated mammalian axons.

    Peter Shrager

Frequent Co-Authors

S. Rock Levinson
S. Rock Levinson University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Matthew N. Rasband
Matthew N. Rasband Baylor College of Medicine
Melitta Schachner
Melitta Schachner Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Roman J. Giger
Roman J. Giger University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Elior Peles
Elior Peles Weizmann Institute of Science
James S. Trimmer
James S. Trimmer University of California, Davis
James L. Salzer
James L. Salzer New York University
Martin Grumet
Martin Grumet Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Lori L. Isom
Lori L. Isom University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Miriam H. Meisler
Miriam H. Meisler University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Peter Shrager

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles