World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
53
Citations
8354
World Ranking
1024
National Ranking
422

Peretz P. Friedmann publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peretz P. Friedmann sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 308 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Peretz P. Friedmann D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peretz P. Friedmann sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2003 - Spirit of St. Louis Medal, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers

Overview

Peretz P. Friedmann is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States and specializes in the field of engineering. Their research primarily focuses on computational mechanics and aerospace engineering, with additional work in statistical and nonlinear physics, statistics, probability and uncertainty, and computational theory and mathematics.

Their main research topics include:

  • Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
  • Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
  • Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
  • Plasma and Flow Control in Aerodynamics
  • Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows
  • Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
  • Model Reduction and Neural Networks

Friedmann has published several recent papers, including:

  • "An aerothermoelastic analysis framework with reduced-order modeling applied to composite panels in hypersonic flows," 2020, Journal of Fluids and Structures
  • "Aeromechanics and Aeroelastic Stability of Coaxial Rotors," 2021, Journal of Aircraft
  • "Helicopter Shipboard Landing Simulation Including Wind, Deck Motion and Dynamic Ground Effect," 2020, Journal of Aircraft
  • "Aeroelastic Stability Analysis of Coaxial Rotors using Viscous Vortex Particle Method," 2020, AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum
  • "Computational Simulations of Fluidic Actuation on Rotor Blades and Their Experimental Validation," 2021, Journal of Aircraft

The frequent coauthors collaborating with Friedmann are:

  • Ryan P. Patterson
  • Daning Huang
  • Puneet Singh
  • Abhinav Sharma
  • Ashwani K. Padthe

Major publication venues where Friedmann's work appears include:

  • Journal of Aircraft
  • AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum
  • AIAA Journal
  • Journal of the American Helicopter Society
  • Journal of Fluids and Structures

In addition to journal articles, Friedmann has authored a book titled Structural Dynamics, published by Cambridge University Press in 2023.

Throughout their career, Friedmann has been recognized with awards such as the Spirit of St. Louis Medal from The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, received in 2003.

Best Publications

  • Efficient numerical treatment of periodic systems with application to stability problems

    P. Friedmann;C. E. Hammond;Tze‐Hsin ‐H Woo

  • Aeroelastic and Aerothermoelastic Analysis in Hypersonic Flow: Past, Present, and Future

    Jack J. McNamara;Peretz P. Friedmann

  • Vibration reduction in rotorcraft using active control - A comparison of various approaches

    Peretz P. Friedmann;Thomas A. Millott

  • Computational aerodynamics of low Reynolds number plunging, pitching and flexible wings for MAV applications

    Wei Shyy;Yongsheng Lian;J. Tang;Hao Liu

  • Reduced-Order Nonlinear Unsteady Aerodynamic Modeling Using a Surrogate-Based Recurrence Framework

    Bryan Glaz;Li Liu;Peretz P. Friedmann

  • Renaissance of Aeroelasticity and Its Future

    Peretz P. Friedmann

  • Rotary-wing aeroelasticity: Current status and future trends

    Peretz P. Friedmann

  • Aeroelastic and Aerothermoelastic Analysis of Hypersonic Vehicles: Current Status and Future Trends

    Jack J. McNamara;Peretz P. Friedmann

  • Higher-Harmonic-Control Algorithm for Helicopter Vibration Reduction Revisited

    Dan Patt;Li Liu;Jaganath Chandrasekar;Dennis S. Bernstein

  • Approximate Modeling of Unsteady Aerodynamics for Hypersonic Aeroelasticity

    Jack J. McNamara;Andrew R. Crowell;Peretz P. Friedmann;Bryan Glaz

  • Aeroelastic and Aerothermoelastic Behavior in Hypersonic Flow

    Jack J. McNamara;Jack J. McNamara;Peretz P. Friedmann;Kenneth G. Powell;Biju J. Thuruthimattam

  • Vibration reduction in helicopter rotors using an actively controlled partial span trailing edge flap located on the blade

    T. A. Millott;P. P. Friedmann

  • Multiple-Surrogate Approach to Helicopter Rotor Blade Vibration Reduction

    Bryan Glaz;Tushar Goel;Li Liu;Peretz P. Friedmann

  • OPTIMUM DESIGN OF ROTOR BLADES FOR VIBRATION REDUCTION IN FORWARD FLIGHT.

    P. P. Friedmann;P. Shanthakumaran

  • Application of a New Compressible Time Domain Aerodynamic Model to Vibration Reduction in Helicopters Using an Actively Controlled Flap

    Timothy F. Myrtle;Peretz P. Friedmann

  • Characterization of carbon nanotubes produced by arc discharge: Effect of the background pressure

    Erik I. Waldorff;Anthony M. Waas;Peretz P. Friedmann;Michael Keidar

  • Nonlinear equations of equilibrium for elastic helicopter or wind turbine blades undergoing moderate deformation.

    A. Rosen;P. P. Friedmann

  • Simultaneous vibration and noise reduction in rotorcraft using aeroelastic simulation

    Dan Patt;Li Liu;Peretz P. Friedmann

  • Towards integrated multidisciplinary synthesis of actively controlled fiber composite wings

    E. Livne;L. A. Schmit;P. P. Friedmann

  • Surrogate based optimization of helicopter rotor blades for vibration reduction in forward flight

    Bryan Glaz;Peretz P. Friedmann;Li Liu

  • The Nonlinear Behavior of Elastic Slender Straight Beams Undergoing Small Strains and Moderate Rotations

    A. Rosen;P. Friedmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Jack J. McNamara
Jack J. McNamara The Ohio State University
Dennis S. Bernstein
Dennis S. Bernstein University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Wei Shyy
Wei Shyy Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Anthony M. Waas
Anthony M. Waas Arizona State University
Carlos E. S. Cesnik
Carlos E. S. Cesnik University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Luis P. Bernal
Luis P. Bernal University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Raphael T. Haftka
Raphael T. Haftka University of Florida
Dewey H. Hodges
Dewey H. Hodges Georgia Institute of Technology
Ranjan Ganguli
Ranjan Ganguli Arizona State University
Peter Ifju
Peter Ifju University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

While studying Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in the USA offers a range of exciting opportunities, many students explore related fields that complement their skills. For those interested in human behavior and support roles, degrees like counseling or speech-language pathology can be appealing alternatives or additions. Understanding "what is the easiest counseling degree" can help prospective students find programs that align with their career goals without overwhelming prerequisites.

Similarly, accelerated options such as a "accelerated applied behavior analysis masters online" are gaining popularity for students who want to quickly enter the workforce with specialized skills in behavior therapy and analysis. These programs often provide flexible learning schedules suited for working professionals.

For students aiming at speech and language therapy professions, it’s crucial to know "is it hard to get into slp grad school." Researching admissions requirements and realistic acceptance rates can guide applicants toward well-prepared applications.

To ease this journey, many seek "easiest speech pathology programs to get into" as a way to balance academic challenges with career aspirations. Exploring such related online degrees and career pathways can significantly broaden prospects beyond traditional engineering roles.

Best Scientists Citing Peretz P. Friedmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles