World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Philip E. Wannamaker

Philip E. Wannamaker

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
36
Citations
6566
World Ranking
7100
National Ranking
2456

Philip E. Wannamaker publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip E. Wannamaker sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 130 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Philip E. Wannamaker D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip E. Wannamaker sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of the Geological Society of America
  • Fellow of the Geological Society of America
  • Fellow of the Geological Society of America

Overview

Philip E. Wannamaker is affiliated with the University of Utah in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a significant emphasis on Geophysics. Additional areas of study include Engineering, Ocean Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Mechanics of Materials, and Nuclear and High Energy Physics.

Within these disciplines, Wannamaker's work covers a broad range of scientific topics. Key subjects include:

  • Seismic Waves and Analysis
  • Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
  • Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Geophysical Methods and Applications
  • Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
  • High-pressure geophysics and materials
  • NMR spectroscopy and applications

Wannamaker has contributed to multiple peer-reviewed publications. Notable recent papers include:

  • Trans-crustal structural control of CO2-rich extensional magmatic systems revealed at Mount Erebus Antarctica (2022, Nature Communications)
  • Play Fairway analysis of geothermal resources across the State of Hawai'i: 4. Updates with new groundwater chemistry, subsurface stress analysis, and focused geophysical surveys (2020, Geothermics)
  • Magmatic, hydrothermal and ore element transfer processes of the southeastern Archean Superior Province implied from electrical resistivity structure (2021, Gondwana Research)
  • Feasibility of source-free DAS logging for next-generation borehole imaging (2022, Scientific Reports)
  • Thermal regime and state of hydration of the Antarctic upper mantle from regional-scale electrical properties (2021, Geological Society London Memoirs)

Frequent coauthors in their work are:

  • Graham J. Hill
  • Virginie Maris
  • John A. Stodt
  • M. A. Kordy
  • Eric Roots

Wannamaker has published work in several venues, with multiple publications appearing in:

  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)
  • Nature Communications
  • Geothermics
  • Gondwana Research
  • Scientific Reports

The scientist has been recognized as a Fellow of the Geological Society of America.

Best Publications

  • Magnetotelluric Responses of Three-Dimensional Bodies in Layered Earths

    P.E. Wannamaker;G.W. Hohmann;S. H. Ward

  • A stable finite element solution for two-dimensional magnetotelluric modelling

    Philip E. Wannamaker;John A. Stodt;Luis Rijo

  • Electromagnetic modeling of three‐dimensional bodies in layered earths using integral equations

    Philip E. Wannamaker;Gerald W. Hohmann;William A. SanFilipo

  • Three-dimensional magnetotelluric modeling using difference equations­ Theory and comparisons to integral equation solutions

    Randall L. Mackie;Theodore R. Madden;Philip E. Wannamaker

  • Deep electrical resistivity structure of the northwestern U.S. derived from 3-D inversion of USArray magnetotelluric data

    Naser M. Meqbel;Gary D. Egbert;Philip E. Wannamaker;Anna Kelbert

  • Fluid and deformation regime of an advancing subduction system at Marlborough, New Zealand

    Philip E. Wannamaker;T. Grant Caldwell;George R. Jiracek;Virginie Maris

  • Resistivity cross section through the Juan de Fuca Subduction System and its tectonic implications

    Philip E. Wannamaker;John R. Booker;Alan G. Jones;Alan D. Chave

  • Advances in three-dimensional magnetotelluric modeling using integral equations

    Philip E. Wannamaker

  • Fluid generation and pathways beneath an active compressional orogen, the New Zealand Southern Alps, inferred from magnetotelluric data

    Philip E. Wannamaker;George R. Jiracek;John A. Stodt;T. Grant Caldwell

  • Two-dimensional topographic responses in magnetotellurics modeled using finite elements

    Philip E. Wannamaker;John A. Stodt;Luis Rijo

  • ANISOTROPY VERSUS HETEROGENEITY IN CONTINENTAL SOLID EARTH ELECTROMAGNETIC STUDIES: FUNDAMENTAL RESPONSE CHARACTERISTICS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PHYSICOCHEMICAL STATE

    Philip E. Wannamaker

  • Three-dimensional magnetotelluric characterization of the Coso geothermal field

    Gregory A. Newman;Erika Gasperikova;G. Michael Hoversten;Philip E. Wannamaker

  • Pathway from subducting slab to surface for melt and fluids beneath Mount Rainier

    R. Shane McGary;Rob L. Evans;Philip E. Wannamaker;Jimmy Elsenbeck

  • Lithospheric dismemberment and magmatic processes of the Great Basin–Colorado Plateau transition, Utah, implied from magnetotellurics

    Philip E. Wannamaker;Derrick P. Hasterok;Jeffery M. Johnston;John A. Stodt

  • Comment on “The petrologic case for a dry lower crust” by Bruce W. D. Yardley and John W. Valley

    Philip E. Wannamaker

  • Segmentation of plate coupling, fate of subduction fluids, and modes of arc magmatism in Cascadia, inferred from magnetotelluric resistivity

    Philip E. Wannamaker;Rob L. Evans;Paul A. Bedrosian;Martyn J. Unsworth

  • Preliminary results from a geophysical study across a modern, continent-continent collisional plate boundary — the Southern Alps, New Zealand

    F.J. Davey;T. Henyey;W.S. Holbrook;D. Okaya

  • Calculating the two‐dimensional magnetotelluric Jacobian in finite elements using reciprocity

    Patricia Pastana de Lugão;Philip E. Wannamaker

  • 3-D magnetotelluric inversion including topography using deformed hexahedral edge finite elements and direct solvers parallelized on SMP computers – Part I: forward problem and parameter Jacobians

    M. Kordy;P. Wannamaker;V. Maris;E. Cherkaev

  • Tensor CSAMT survey over the Sulphur Springs thermal area, Valles Caldera, New Mexico, U.S.A., Part I: Implications for structure of the western caldera

    Philip E. Wannamaker

  • Magnetotelluric observations across the Juan de Fuca Subduction System in the EMSLAB Project

    Philip E. Wannamaker;John R. Booker;Jean H. Filloux;Alan G. Jones

Frequent Co-Authors

Gerald W. Hohmann
Gerald W. Hohmann University of Utah
Gregory A. Newman
Gregory A. Newman Colorado State University
Rob L. Evans
Rob L. Evans Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Gary D. Egbert
Gary D. Egbert Oregon State University
Alan D. Chave
Alan D. Chave Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Alan G. Jones
Alan G. Jones Dublin Institute For Advanced Studies
Martyn Unsworth
Martyn Unsworth University of Alberta
David D. Blackwell
David D. Blackwell Southern Methodist University
Tim Stern
Tim Stern Victoria University of Wellington
Fred Davey
Fred Davey GNS Science

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens doors to diverse career options, but many students also consider complementary fields to enhance their expertise. For instance, pursuing a masters in library science can be valuable for those interested in managing scientific data and research archives effectively.

Visual communication is another key area linked to Earth Science, especially in environmental monitoring and documentation. An online photography degrees program can equip students with essential skills to capture and analyze visual data, which is critical for field studies and presentations.

Veterans looking to transition into Earth Science can benefit from tailored programs like photography degree online for veterans, providing flexibility and career-focused training to adapt military skills to civilian roles within environmental sciences.

Language skills also play a crucial role in global research collaborations and fieldwork. Shorter programs, such as short spanish degrees, offer accessible opportunities to develop language proficiency that enhances communication in diverse scientific communities.

Best Scientists Citing Philip E. Wannamaker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles