World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
80
Citations
27422
World Ranking
16991
National Ranking
8521

Paul W. Newacheck publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul W. Newacheck sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 187 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Paul W. Newacheck D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul W. Newacheck sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul W. Newacheck is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Dentistry and Social Sciences, with specific focus on subfields including Periodontics and Sociology and Political Science.

Their work covers topics related to Dental Health and Care Utilization as well as Racial and Ethnic Identity Research. These topics reflect an interdisciplinary approach connecting healthcare and social determinants influencing oral health outcomes.

Newacheck has authored research published in venues such as UNC Libraries. One of their recent papers is titled An Examination of Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Children's Oral Health in the United States, published in 2020 by UNC Libraries.

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Susan A. Fisher-Owens
  • Inyang A. Isong
  • Mah-J Soobader
  • Stuart A. Gansky
  • Jane A. Weintraub

Best Publications

  • A New Definition of Children With Special Health Care Needs

    Merle McPherson;Polly Arango;Harriette Fox;Cassie Lauver

  • Influences on children's oral health: a conceptual model.

    Susan A. Fisher-Owens;Stuart A. Gansky;Larry J. Platt;Jane A. Weintraub

  • Childhood chronic illness: prevalence, severity, and impact.

    Paul W. Newacheck;William R. Taylor

  • Adverse childhood experiences: assessing the impact on health and school engagement and the mitigating role of resilience.

    Christina D. Bethell;Paul Newacheck;Eva Hawes;Neal Halfon

  • An Epidemiologic Profile of Children With Special Health Care Needs

    Paul W. Newacheck;Bonnie Strickland;Jack P. Shonkoff;James M. Perrin

  • Identifying children with special health care needs: development and evaluation of a short screening instrument.

    Christina D. Bethell;Debra Read;Ruth E.K. Stein;Stephen J. Blumberg

  • The Unmet Health Needs of America's Children

    Paul W. Newacheck;Dana C. Hughes;Yun-Yi Hung;Sabrina Wong

  • Childhood Asthma and Poverty: Differential Impacts and Utilization of Health Services

    Neal Halfon;Paul W. Newacheck

  • Impact of Family Relocation on Children's Growth, Development, School Function, and Behavior

    David Wood;Neal Halfon;Debra Scarlata;Paul Newacheck

  • Prevalence and impact of disabling chronic conditions in childhood.

    P W Newacheck;N Halfon

  • A national profile of health care utilization and expenditures for children with special health care needs.

    Paul W. Newacheck;Sue E. Kim

  • Children's Access to Primary Care: Differences by Race, Income, and Insurance Status

    Paul W. Newacheck;Dana C. Hughes;Jeffrey J. Stoddard

  • Issues Involved in the Definition and Classification of Chronic Health Conditions

    E. C. Perrin;P. Newacheck;I. B. Pless;D. Drotar

  • A Review of the Evidence for the Medical Home for Children With Special Health Care Needs

    CJ Homer;K Klatka;D Romm;K Kuhlthau

  • Impact of childhood asthma on health.

    William R. Taylor;Paul W. Newacheck

  • Health Insurance and Access to Primary Care for Children

    Paul W. Newacheck;Jeffrey J. Stoddard;Dana C. Hughes;Michelle Pearl

  • Access to Health Care for Children With Special Health Care Needs

    Paul W. Newacheck;Margaret McManus;Harriette B. Fox;Yun-Yi Hung

  • Prevalence, Impact, and Trends in Childhood Disability Due to Asthma

    Paul W. Newacheck;Neal Halfon

  • Evidence for Family-Centered Care for Children With Special Health Care Needs: A Systematic Review

    Karen A. Kuhlthau;Sheila Bloom;Jeanne Van Cleave;Alixandra A. Knapp

  • Prevalence and characteristics of children with special health care needs.

    Peter C. van Dyck;Michael D. Kogan;Merle G. McPherson;Gloria R. Weissman

Frequent Co-Authors

Neal Halfon
Neal Halfon University of California, Los Angeles
Michael D. Kogan
Michael D. Kogan United States Department of Health and Human Services
James M. Perrin
James M. Perrin Harvard University
Claire D. Brindis
Claire D. Brindis University of California, San Francisco
Charles E. Irwin
Charles E. Irwin University of California, San Francisco
Sabrina T. Wong
Sabrina T. Wong University of British Columbia
Steven L. Gortmaker
Steven L. Gortmaker Harvard University
Gopal K. Singh
Gopal K. Singh United States Department of Health and Human Services
Jack P. Shonkoff
Jack P. Shonkoff Harvard University
Laurie J. Bauman
Laurie J. Bauman Albert Einstein College of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine doesn’t just mean becoming a physician. Today, there are diverse online degree options that can launch or advance your career in healthcare. If you want to lead hospitals, clinics, or health systems, consider a healthcare administration online degree—these programs are designed to build leadership and organizational skills specific to the healthcare sector.

For nurses looking to expand their expertise, transitioning from an associate’s degree to a family nurse practitioner is a popular path. Some schools offer targeted asn to fnp (ADN to MSN) bridge programs online, allowing registered nurses to progress toward advanced practice roles without pausing their careers.

Nutrition is another growing field with flexible learning options. Enrolling in a nutritionist online degree can help you launch a career in wellness, clinical dietetics, or public health.

When considering any degree in healthcare administration, it’s vital to know how to evaluate healthcare administration degree programs. Accreditation, curriculum quality, faculty experience, and career support should all be reviewed before enrolling to ensure your investment pays off.

Best Scientists Citing Paul W. Newacheck

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles