World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
76
Citations
18055
World Ranking
1734
National Ranking
1023

Paul Satz publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Satz sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 227 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Paul Satz D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Satz sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1996 - APA Award for Distinguished Professional Contributions to Applied Research
  • 1987 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Paul Satz was affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States. Their work primarily focused on the fields of Psychology and Neuroscience, with particular attention to subfields such as Developmental and Educational Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience.

The main topics covered in their research included:

  • Educational and Psychological Assessments
  • Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
  • Reading and Literacy Development

Throughout their career, Paul Satz collaborated frequently with Lorie A. Humphrey.

They received recognition in the form of awards including the APA Award for Distinguished Professional Contributions to Applied Research in 1996 and were made a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1987.

Best Publications

  • Brain reserve capacity on symptom onset after brain injury: A formulation and review of evidence for threshold theory.

    Paul Satz

  • Nomenclature and research case definitions for neurologic manifestations of human immunodeficiency virus-type 1 (HIV-1) infection

    Robert S. Janssen;David R. Cornblath;Leon G. Epstein;Richard P. Foa

  • Pathological Left-Handedness: An Explanaory Model

    Paul Satz

  • Neuropsychological performance in HIV‐1‐infected homosexual men The Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS)*

    Eric N. Miller;O. A. Selnes;J. C. McArthur;P. Satz

  • An abbreviation of the WAIS for clinical use.

    Paul Satz;Steve Mogel

  • 5 – LEARNING DISABILITY SUBTYPES: A Review

    Paul Satz;Robin Morris

  • WHO Neuropsychiatric AIDS study, cross-sectional phase II. Neuropsychological and neurological findings.

    Mario Maj;Paul Satz;Robert Janssen;Michael Zaudig

  • Evaluation of two new neuropsychological tests designed to minimize cultural bias in the assessment of HIV-1 seropositive persons: a WHO study.

    Mario Maj;Lou D'Elia;Paul Satz;Robert Janssen

  • Normative data stratified by age and education for the Neuropsychological Screening Battery for Hispanics (NeSBHIS): Initial report.

    Marcel O. Pontón;Paul Satz;Lawrence Herrera;Freddy Ortiz

  • Neuropsychology of human emotion

    Paul Satz;Kenneth M. Heilman

  • Cognitive Correlates of Long-term Cannabis Use in Costa Rican Men

    Jack M. Fletcher;J. Bryan Page;David J. Francis;Kimberly Copeland

  • Minor Physical Anomalies in Schizophrenia

    Michael Foster Green;Paul Satz;Donna J. Gaier;Steven Ganzell

  • Mild head injury in children and adolescents: a review of studies (1970-1995).

    Paul Satz;Kenneth Zaucha;Carol McCleary;Roger Light

  • Correlations between assessed manual laterality and predicted speech laterality in a normal population

    Paul Satz;Karl Achenbach;Eileen Fennell

  • WHO Neuropsychiatric AIDS Study, Cross-sectional Phase I: Study Design and Psychiatric Findings

    Mario Maj;Robert Janssen;Fabrizio Starace;Michael Zaudig

  • Metabolic Recovery Following Human Traumatic Brain Injury Based on FDG-PET: Time Course and Relationship to Neurological Disability

    Marvin Bergsneider;David A. Hovda;David L. Mcarthur;Maria Etchepare

  • Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance in schizophrenia: remediation of a stubborn deficit.

    Michael F. Green;Paul Satz;Steven Ganzell;Jody F. Vaclav

  • Computerized and conventional neuropsychological assessment of HIV‐1‐infected homosexual men

    Eric N. Miller;Paul Satz;Barbara Visscher

  • Psychosocial risk factors of HIV morbidity and mortality: findings from the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS).

    Roxanna Farinpour;Eric N. Miller;Paul Satz;Ola A. Selnes

  • Left-handedness and early brain insult: An explanation

    Paul Satz

Frequent Co-Authors

Wilfred G. van Gorp
Wilfred G. van Gorp Columbia University
Michael F. Green
Michael F. Green University of California, Los Angeles
Jack M. Fletcher
Jack M. Fletcher University of Houston
Robert F. Asarnow
Robert F. Asarnow University of California, Los Angeles
Charles H. Hinkin
Charles H. Hinkin University of California, Los Angeles
Ola A. Selnes
Ola A. Selnes Johns Hopkins University
Hector F. Myers
Hector F. Myers Vanderbilt University
James T. Becker
James T. Becker University of Pittsburgh
Justin C. McArthur
Justin C. McArthur Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Domenic V. Cicchetti
Domenic V. Cicchetti Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens diverse online degree and career options. Many students pursue counseling, mental health, and social service roles. Online psychology programs now offer flexible routes, making it easier to earn degrees while balancing other commitments.

If you are considering a counseling career, state requirements and pathways can differ. There are initiatives designed to help students access the Minnesota fastest counseling programs, allowing quicker entry into the field. Similarly, you can follow the quickest path to becoming a counselor in Mississippi, outlining the most efficient degree and licensure steps.

If you live elsewhere, explore the quickest path to becoming a counselor in Missouri or the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Montana to see how the requirements and timelines compare. These resources can help you choose a program that fits your career timeline and state licensing needs.

Whether you pursue a bachelor’s, master’s, or doctoral degree, reviewing local regulations and online options is vital to shaping your psychology career path.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Satz

Recently Published Articles