World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 79 17445 16392 8733 8068 618 26428

Pasquale Santangeli publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Pasquale Santangeli between 2006 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Pasquale Santangeli published across 21 years, from 2006 to 2026, averaging 40.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 111 publications in 2025. 117 of the 857 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 111. Peak 111 publications in 2025. 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 30 publications 2012: 37 publications 2013: 37 publications 2014: 44 publications 2015: 45 publications 2016: 32 publications 2017: 38 publications 2018: 44 publications 2019: 48 publications 2020: 56 publications 2021: 63 publications 2022: 66 publications 2023: 87 publications 2024: 84 publications 2025: 111 publications 2026: 6 publications
2006 2026

857 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Pasquale Santangeli: publications per year, 2006 to 2026
Year Publications
2006 1
2007 2
2008 9
2009 3
2010 14
2011 30
2012 37
2013 37
2014 44
2015 45
2016 32
2017 38
2018 44
2019 48
2020 56
2021 63
2022 66
2023 87
2024 84
2025 111
2026 6
Total 857
Download as CSV

Pasquale Santangeli publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pasquale Santangeli sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 601–620 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 618 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396 618
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Pasquale Santangeli D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pasquale Santangeli sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891 79
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Pasquale Santangeli is affiliated with the Cleveland Clinic Foundation in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with specific contributions to Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine as well as related subfields such as Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, and Epidemiology.

Their work addresses several key topics within cardiovascular research, including:

  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
  • Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders

Pasquale Santangeli has collaborated extensively with several frequent co-authors, notably:

  • Francis E. Marchlinski
  • Oussama M. Wazni
  • Ayman A. Hussein
  • Walid I. Saliba
  • Jakub Sroubek

Their research contributions have been published predominantly in renowned venues such as:

  • Heart Rhythm
  • JACC. Clinical Electrophysiology
  • Circulation
  • Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
  • EP Europace

Among their recent notable papers are:

  • 2021 Guideline for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (2021, Stroke)
  • Recognizing COVID-19-related myocarditis: The possible pathophysiology and proposed guideline for diagnosis and management (2020, Heart Rhythm)
  • COVID-19 and cardiac arrhythmias (2020, Heart Rhythm)
  • EHRA expert consensus statement on arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse and mitral annular disjunction complex in collaboration with the ESC Council on valvular heart disease and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society, by the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and by the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (2022, EP Europace)
  • Effect of Long-term Continuous Cardiac Monitoring vs Usual Care on Detection of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Stroke Attributed to Large- or Small-Vessel Disease (2021, JAMA)

Best Publications

  • Does the Left Atrial Appendage Morphology Correlate With the Risk of Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation?: Results From a Multicenter Study

    Luigi Di Biase;Pasquale Santangeli;Matteo Anselmino;Prasant Mohanty

  • Left atrial appendage: An underrecognized trigger site of atrial fibrillation

    Luigi Di Biase;Luigi Di Biase;J. David Burkhardt;Prasant Mohanty;Javier Sanchez

  • Ablation Versus Amiodarone for Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure and an Implanted Device Results From the AATAC Multicenter Randomized Trial

    Luigi Di Biase;Prashant Mohanty;Sanghamitra Mohanty;Pasquale Santangeli

  • Periprocedural Stroke and Bleeding Complications in Patients Undergoing Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation With Different Anticoagulation Management Results From the Role of Coumadin in Preventing Thromboembolism in Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Patients Undergoing Catheter Ablation (COMPARE) Randomized Trial

    Luigi Di Biase;J. David Burkhardt;Pasquale Santangeli;Prasant Mohanty

  • 2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias.

    Cronin Em;Bogun Fm;Maury P;Peichl P

  • Endo-epicardial homogenization of the scar versus limited substrate ablation for the treatment of electrical storms in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

    Luigi Di Biase;Luigi Di Biase;Pasquale Santangeli;David J. Burkhardt;Rong Bai

  • COVID-19 and cardiac arrhythmias.

    Anjali Bhatla;Michael M. Mayer;Srinath Adusumalli;Matthew C. Hyman

  • Periprocedural Stroke and Management of Major Bleeding Complications in Patients Undergoing Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: The Impact of Periprocedural Therapeutic International Normalized Ratio

    Luigi Di Biase;Luigi Di Biase;J. David Burkhardt;Prasant Mohanty;Javier Sanchez

  • Left Atrial Appendage Isolation in Patients With Longstanding Persistent AF Undergoing Catheter Ablation: BELIEF Trial

    Luigi Di Biase;J. David Burkhardt;Prasant Mohanty;Sanghamitra Mohanty

  • Feasibility and Safety of Dabigatran Versus Warfarin for Periprocedural Anticoagulation in Patients Undergoing Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Results From a Multicenter Prospective Registry

    Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy;Yeruva Madhu Reddy;Luigi Di Biase;Luigi Di Biase;Subba Reddy Vanga

  • Ablation of Stable VTs Versus Substrate Ablation in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy the VISTA Randomized Multicenter Trial

    Luigi Di Biase;J. David Burkhardt;Dhanujaya Lakkireddy;Corrado Carbucicchio

  • Ablation of ventricular arrhythmias in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy: arrhythmia-free survival after endo-epicardial substrate based mapping and ablation.

    Rong Bai;Luigi Di Biase;Luigi Di Biase;Kalyanam Shivkumar;Prasant Mohanty

  • Atrial fibrillation and the risk of incident dementia: A meta-analysis

    Pasquale Santangeli;Luigi Di Biase;Luigi Di Biase;Rong Bai;Sanghamitra Mohanty

  • Increased Mortality Associated with Digoxin in Contemporary Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Findings from the TREAT-AF Study

    Mintu P. Turakhia;Mintu P. Turakhia;Pasquale Santangeli;Wolfgang C. Winkelmayer;Xiangyan Xu

  • Techniques for the provocation, localization, and ablation of non-pulmonary vein triggers for atrial fibrillation.

    Pasquale Santangeli;Francis E. Marchlinski

  • General anesthesia reduces the prevalence of pulmonary vein reconnection during repeat ablation when compared with conscious sedation: Results from a randomized study

    Luigi Di Biase;Luigi Di Biase;Sergio Conti;Prasant Mohanty;Rong Bai

  • Prevalence and distribution of focal triggers in persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation

    Pasquale Santangeli;Erica S. Zado;Mathew D. Hutchinson;Michael P. Riley

Frequent Co-Authors

Luigi Di Biase
Luigi Di Biase Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Andrea Natale
Andrea Natale Case Western Reserve University
William G. Stevenson
William G. Stevenson Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Filippo Crea
Filippo Crea Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Francis E. Marchlinski
Francis E. Marchlinski University of Pennsylvania
Sana M. Al-Khatib
Sana M. Al-Khatib Duke University
Antonio Russo
Antonio Russo University of Palermo
Frank Bogun
Frank Bogun University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Mina K. Chung
Mina K. Chung Cleveland Clinic
Kalyanam Shivkumar
Kalyanam Shivkumar University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The medical field offers numerous online degree options and career pathways suitable for diverse interests and goals. Those interested in advancing their nursing careers may be attracted to specialized programs such as the fastest pmhnp program, which provides a quicker route to becoming a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner.

Beyond clinical roles, healthcare administration is a popular path, with a strong demand for skilled leaders who can navigate complex healthcare systems. Many students seek options focused on healthcare administration degree cost to manage expenses while earning a valuable credential. Researching the cheapest mha online programs can further help you find affordable ways to gain a Master’s in Healthcare Administration.

For those pursuing leadership or advanced clinical roles, a Doctor of Nursing Practice may be the next step. Exploring the cheapest dnp program supports cost-effective career advancement. Online opportunities make it easier than ever to continue your medical education while balancing work and life.

Best Scientists Citing Pasquale Santangeli

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles