What is she best known for?
The fields of study she is best known for:
- Poverty
- Microeconomics
- Labour economics
Nina Smith focuses on Demographic economics, Danish, Labour economics, Panel data and Empirical evidence.
Her Demographic economics study frequently intersects with other fields, such as Socioeconomics.
Her Danish research includes a combination of various areas of study, such as Childbirth, Estimation, Sample, Male workers and Gender diversity.
Many of her research projects under Labour economics are closely connected to Glass ceiling, Nordic model and Total fertility rate with Glass ceiling, Nordic model and Total fertility rate, tying the diverse disciplines of science together.
As part of her studies on Panel data, Nina Smith often connects relevant areas like School-to-work transition.
Empirical evidence is intertwined with Selection, Oecd countries, Vice president and Promotion in her study.
Her most cited work include:
- Do Women in Top Management Affect Firm Performance? A Panel Study of 2500 Danish Firms (518 citations)
- Selection and network effects—Migration flows into OECD countries 1990–2000 (300 citations)
- Children and Career Interruptions: The Family Gap in Denmark (187 citations)
What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?
Her primary areas of study are Danish, Demographic economics, Labour economics, Wage and Panel data.
Nina Smith incorporates a variety of subjects into her writings, including Danish, Affect, Childbirth, Sample, Refugee and Promotion.
Her Demographic economics research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Closing and Earnings.
In the subject of general Labour economics, her work in Labour supply is often linked to Welfare state, thereby combining diverse domains of study.
The Efficiency wage and Wage dispersion research Nina Smith does as part of her general Wage study is frequently linked to other disciplines of science, such as Decile, Sample selection and Convergence, therefore creating a link between diverse domains of science.
In her study, she carries out multidisciplinary Panel data and Random effects model research.
She most often published in these fields:
- Danish (60.98%)
- Demographic economics (57.93%)
- Labour economics (58.54%)
What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2012-2019)?
- Danish (60.98%)
- Demographic economics (57.93%)
- School size (17.07%)
In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:
Her primary scientific interests are in Danish, Demographic economics, School size, Developmental psychology and Test.
Her Danish research spans across into subjects like Gender identity, Negative association, Empirical evidence and Social psychology.
Her Stereotype and Persistence study in the realm of Social psychology interacts with subjects such as Self-stereotyping, Field and Survey data collection.
Her work on Closing expands to the thematically related Demographic economics.
Her Family structure study, which is part of a larger body of work in Developmental psychology, is frequently linked to Social issues and Educational achievement, bridging the gap between disciplines.
Her studies in Accounting integrate themes in fields like Gender diversity and Corporate governance.
Between 2012 and 2019, her most popular works were:
- Why are So Few Females Promoted into CEO and Vice President Positions? Danish Empirical Evidence, 1997–2007 (56 citations)
- Why so Few Women on Boards of Directors? Empirical Evidence from Danish Companies in 1998–2010 (23 citations)
- Child Care and Parental Leave in the Nordic Countries: A Model to Aspire to? (15 citations)
In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Poverty
- Microeconomics
- Finance
Nina Smith mostly deals with Demographic economics, Danish, Test, Negative association and Closing.
Her Demographic economics research incorporates themes from Economic efficiency, School size and Gender psychology.
Her School size study incorporates themes from Earnings, Fixed effects model, Instrumental variable and Educational systems.
Her Danish research spans across into areas like Empirical evidence, Sibling, Parenteral transmission, Human capital and Developmental psychology.
Her Empirical evidence research encompasses a variety of disciplines, including Promotion, Vice president, Business ethics, Tokenism and Corporate governance.
Many of her studies involve connections with topics such as Short run and Closing.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
