World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Economics and Finance 34 3045 2762 17 17 96 7305

Nina Smith publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nina Smith between 1983 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nina Smith published across 43 years, from 1983 to 2025, averaging 3 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2002. 8 of the 130 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2002. 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 5 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 1 publication 2011: 5 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 5 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 5 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 2 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 3 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 4 publications
1983 2025

130 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nina Smith: publications per year, 1983 to 2025
Year Publications
1983 1
1984 0
1985 0
1986 1
1987 1
1988 2
1989 1
1990 2
1991 1
1992 2
1993 2
1994 0
1995 4
1996 4
1997 1
1998 5
1999 2
2000 5
2001 8
2002 9
2003 8
2004 5
2005 6
2006 6
2007 7
2008 4
2009 1
2010 1
2011 5
2012 1
2013 5
2014 5
2015 2
2016 2
2017 1
2018 5
2019 1
2020 2
2021 1
2022 3
2023 0
2024 4
2025 4
Total 130
Download as CSV

Nina Smith publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nina Smith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 42–46 to 521+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 111. Most scientists, 111, have 137–141 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 92–96 publications, is where this scientist sits. 42–46 publications: 1 scientist 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42–46 publications 521+

This scientist: 96 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Economics and Finance scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,760 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
42–46 1
47–51 12
52–56 7
57–61 23
62–66 32
67–71 36
72–76 56
77–81 57
82–86 70
87–91 86
92–96 72 96
97–101 106
102–106 97
107–111 96
112–116 101
117–121 103
122–126 102
127–131 108
132–136 107
137–141 111
142–146 94
147–151 96
152–156 100
157–161 74
162–166 68
167–171 91
172–176 76
177–181 75
182–186 61
187–191 66
192–196 68
197–201 71
202–206 60
207–211 56
212–216 44
217–221 51
222–226 65
227–231 48
232–236 59
237–241 37
242–246 37
247–251 41
252–256 43
257–261 33
262–266 34
267–271 39
272–276 25
277–281 29
282–286 29
287–291 26
292–296 31
297–301 31
302–306 24
307–311 28
312–316 24
317–321 13
322–326 14
327–331 25
332–336 18
337–341 16
342–346 18
347–351 15
352–356 17
357–361 19
362–366 16
367–371 17
372–376 7
377–381 18
382–386 13
387–391 19
392–396 9
397–401 10
402–406 13
407–411 13
412–416 5
417–421 10
422–426 6
427–431 12
432–436 9
437–441 9
442–446 10
447–451 12
452–456 8
457–461 4
462–466 7
467–471 4
472–476 5
477–481 6
482–486 7
487–491 8
492–496 5
497–501 4
502–506 4
507–511 5
512–516 7
517–520 7
521+ 99
Download as CSV

Nina Smith D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nina Smith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 72 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 101+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 178. Most scientists, 178, have 33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Economics and Finance scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,760 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 126
31 147
32 157
33 178
34 171 34
35 141
36 132
37 129
38 130
39 120
40 117
41 113
42 114
43 97
44 115
45 86
46 78
47 83
48 62
49 74
50 50
51 66
52 69
53 55
54 67
55 61
56 62
57 45
58 34
59 47
60 46
61 36
62 37
63 56
64 50
65 32
66 28
67 30
68 24
69 25
70 22
71 21
72 26
73 24
74 23
75 12
76 14
77 15
78 15
79 17
80 17
81 11
82 10
83 16
84 11
85 5
86 9
87 13
88 9
89 7
90 6
91 4
92 8
93 10
94 11
95 6
96 4
97 4
98 6
99 6
100 8
101+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Nina Smith is affiliated with Aarhus University in Denmark and has contributed to the field of social sciences, with a particular focus on gender studies. Their research broadly explores gender diversity, labor dynamics, and issues related to family and work balance.

The main fields of study for Nina Smith cover social sciences, with concentrated work in subfields such as:

  • Gender Studies
  • Education
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Accounting

Key topics in their research include:

  • Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
  • Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Gender Politics and Representation
  • Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Corporate Finance and Governance

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Nina Smith encompass a range of relevant themes. These include:

  • "Gender stereotyping and self-stereotyping among Danish managers," published in 2021 in Gender in Management An International Journal

Several works associated with Nina Smith have appeared alongside contributions from frequent co-authors such as Emma von Essen, Tor Eriksson, Valdemar Smith, Anders Frederiksen, and Takao Kato.

Publication venues where Nina Smith has published include:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Journal of Labor Economics
  • Samfundsøkonomen
  • Gender in Management An International Journal
  • Early Childhood Education Journal

Nina Smith has contributed to the authorship of book publications with one known title through King's College London: "Overskudskvinder: Økonomernes vej til det frie og lige liv," scheduled for publication in 2025.

Best Publications

  • Do Women in Top Management Affect Firm Performance? A Panel Study of 2500 Danish Firms

    Nina Smith;Valdemar Smith;Mette Verner

  • Selection and network effects—Migration flows into OECD countries 1990–2000

    Peder J. Pedersen;Mariola Pytlikova;Nina Smith

  • Children and Career Interruptions: The Family Gap in Denmark

    Nabanita Datta Gupta;Nina Smith

  • Income inequality and income mobility in the Scandinavian countries compared to the United States

    Rolf Aaberge;Anders Björklund;Markus Jäntti;Mårten Palme

  • Selection or Network Effects? Migration Flows into 27 OECD Countries, 1990-2000

    Peder J. Pedersen;Mariola Pytlikova;Nina Smith

  • PERSPECTIVE ARTICLE: The impact of Nordic countries’ family friendly policies on employment, wages, and children

    Nabanita Datta Gupta;Nina Smith;Nina Smith;Mette Verner

  • Employment and Wage Assimilation of Male First-generation immigrants in Denmark

    Leif Husted;Helena Skyt Nielsen;Michael Rosholm;Nina Smith

  • The school-to-work transition of 2 nd generation immigrants in Denmark

    Helena Skyt Nielsen;Michael Rosholm;Nina Smith;Leif Husted

  • Swimming Upstream, Floating Downstream: Comparing Women's Relative Wage Progress in the United States and Denmark

    Nabanita Datta Gupta;Ronald L. Oaxaca;Nina Smith

  • Unemployment and marital dissolution.

    Peter Jensen;Nina Smith

  • Why are So Few Females Promoted into CEO and Vice President Positions? Danish Empirical Evidence, 1997–2007

    Nina Smith;Valdemar Smith;Mette Verner

  • Unemployment Shocks and Income Distribution: How did the Nordic Countries Fare during their Crises?

    Rolf Aaberge;Tom Wennemo;Anders Bjorklund;Markus Jantti

  • Child Care and Parental Leave in the Nordic Countries: A Model to Aspire to?

    Nabanita Datta Gupta;Nina Smith;Mette Verner

  • Career Interruptions Due to Parental Leave: A Comparative Study of Denmark and Sweden

    Elina Pylkkänen;Nina Smith

  • Qualifications, discrimination, or assimilation? An extended framework for analysing immigrant wage gaps

    Helena Skyt Nielsen;Michael Rosholm;Nina Smith;Leif Husted

  • Is Marriage Poisonous? Are Relationships Taxing? An Analysis of the Male Marital Wage Differential in Denmark

    Nabanita Datta Gupta;Nina Smith;Leslie S. Stratton

  • THE DANISH GENDER WAGE GAP IN THE 1980s: A PANEL DATA STUDY

    Michael Rosholm;Nina Smith

  • Do Women in Top Management Affect Firm Performance? A Panel Study of 2500 Danish Firms

    Nina Smith;Nina Smith;Valdemar Smith;Mette Verner

  • Wage differentials between the public and private sectors

    P.J. Pederson;J.B. Schmidt-Sørensen;N. Smith;N. Westergård-Nielsen

  • Children and Career Interruptions: The Family Gap in Denmark

    Nina Smith;Nina Smith;Nabanita Datta Gupta;Nabanita Datta Gupta

  • Employment and Wage Assimilation of Male First Generation Immigrants in Denmark

    Nina Smith;Nina Smith;Leif Husted;Helena Skyt Nielsen;Helena Skyt Nielsen;Michael Rosholm;Michael Rosholm

Frequent Co-Authors

Helena Skyt Nielsen
Helena Skyt Nielsen Aarhus University
Michael Rosholm
Michael Rosholm Aarhus University
Anders Björklund
Anders Björklund Lund University
Rolf Aaberge
Rolf Aaberge Statistics Norway
Markus Jäntti
Markus Jäntti Stockholm University
Shirley Dex
Shirley Dex University College London
Jürgen Schupp
Jürgen Schupp German Institute for Economic Research
Takao Kato
Takao Kato Colgate University
Ian Walker
Ian Walker Lancaster University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in Economics and Finance, there are many flexible and affordable online study options available in the USA. For students looking to save on tuition, the cheapest online finance degree programs can provide a quality education without overwhelming student debt. These programs are designed to deliver foundational finance skills and open doors to various finance roles.

For those eager to advance quickly, the fastest mba programs online make it possible to earn an MBA in less than two years, boosting your career prospects and leadership skills in a short timeframe.

If you’re interested in specialized training, earning a bookkeeper certification can help you break into entry-level positions or enhance your credentials as an accounting technician. Entry-level office roles are also within reach with online associate degrees in office administration, providing business fundamentals and administrative expertise.

Each pathway supports diverse career goals—whether you want to climb the corporate ladder, specialize in accounting, or get started in the business world fast, there’s an online degree that fits your ambition.

Best Scientists Citing Nina Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles