World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 122 3455 1898 425 58672
Biology and Biochemistry 123 552 350 413 58641

Nicholas Ling publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nicholas Ling between 1971 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nicholas Ling published across 55 years, from 1971 to 2025, averaging 8.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 43 publications in 1984. 11 of the 463 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1971 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 43. Peak 43 publications in 1984. 1971: 1 publication 1972: 4 publications 1973: 8 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 4 publications 1976: 9 publications 1977: 15 publications 1978: 8 publications 1979: 10 publications 1980: 23 publications 1981: 17 publications 1982: 24 publications 1983: 42 publications 1984: 43 publications 1985: 34 publications 1986: 30 publications 1987: 25 publications 1988: 21 publications 1989: 14 publications 1990: 15 publications 1991: 22 publications 1992: 10 publications 1993: 16 publications 1994: 12 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 7 publications
1971 2025

463 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nicholas Ling: publications per year, 1971 to 2025
Year Publications
1971 1
1972 4
1973 8
1974 1
1975 4
1976 9
1977 15
1978 8
1979 10
1980 23
1981 17
1982 24
1983 42
1984 43
1985 34
1986 30
1987 25
1988 21
1989 14
1990 15
1991 22
1992 10
1993 16
1994 12
1995 6
1996 4
1997 1
1998 2
1999 1
2000 1
2001 2
2002 3
2003 6
2004 2
2005 2
2006 2
2007 3
2008 0
2009 2
2010 0
2011 0
2012 0
2013 0
2014 0
2015 0
2016 0
2017 0
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 4
2023 3
2024 4
2025 7
Total 463
Download as CSV

Nicholas Ling publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas Ling sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 1,028+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 980. Most scientists, 980, have 127–136 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 407–416 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientist 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientist 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 413 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 8
57–66 35
67–76 106
77–86 231
87–96 413
97–106 546
107–116 704
117–126 848
127–136 980
137–146 942
147–156 969
157–166 949
167–176 951
177–186 915
187–196 787
197–206 840
207–216 733
217–226 708
227–236 651
237–246 605
247–256 510
257–266 524
267–276 434
277–286 417
287–296 350
297–306 363
307–316 315
317–326 296
327–336 261
337–346 240
347–356 219
357–366 196
367–376 154
377–386 161
387–396 155
397–406 145
407–416 124 413
417–426 112
427–436 132
437–446 116
447–456 99
457–466 81
467–476 91
477–486 80
487–496 80
497–506 59
507–516 36
517–526 46
527–536 54
537–546 44
547–556 43
557–566 43
567–576 42
577–586 25
587–596 34
597–606 23
607–616 33
617–626 31
627–636 27
637–646 25
647–656 28
657–666 34
667–676 18
677–686 16
687–696 10
697–706 12
707–716 21
717–726 12
727–736 12
737–746 10
747–756 7
757–766 13
767–776 15
777–786 13
787–796 9
797–806 9
807–816 7
817–826 4
827–836 9
837–846 7
847–856 3
857–866 5
867–876 5
877–886 11
887–896 3
897–906 4
907–916 7
917–926 5
927–936 6
937–946 6
947–956 3
957–966 7
967–976 2
977–986 2
987–996 1
997–1,006 5
1,007–1,016 2
1,017–1,026 2
1,027 1
1,028+ 100
Download as CSV

Nicholas Ling D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas Ling sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 65 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 167+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,253. Most scientists, 1,253, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 122–123 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 123 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 80
42–43 183
44–45 316
46–47 504
48–49 718
50–51 899
52–53 1,025
54–55 1,149
56–57 1,235
58–59 1,253
60–61 1,162
62–63 1,130
64–65 1,031
66–67 897
68–69 814
70–71 714
72–73 709
74–75 596
76–77 512
78–79 473
80–81 412
82–83 373
84–85 358
86–87 285
88–89 273
90–91 227
92–93 208
94–95 193
96–97 153
98–99 157
100–101 148
102–103 120
104–105 113
106–107 100
108–109 86
110–111 67
112–113 71
114–115 73
116–117 64
118–119 53
120–121 60
122–123 54 123
124–125 43
126–127 38
128–129 49
130–131 26
132–133 18
134–135 23
136–137 32
138–139 32
140–141 27
142–143 19
144–145 22
146–147 12
148–149 16
150–151 14
152–153 10
154–155 13
156–157 10
158–159 7
160–161 9
162–163 13
164–165 4
166 4
167+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Nicholas Ling is affiliated with the Salk Institute for Biological Studies in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science, with significant work in Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, and Molecular Biology. Additional subfields include Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis as well as Ecological Modeling.

The scientist's research spans a range of topics, including:

  • Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
  • Identification and Quantification in Food
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
  • Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • New Zealand Journal of Zoology
  • New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research
  • Applied Animal Behaviour Science
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Diversity

Among recent publications are:

  • "Measuring the Impact of Conservation: The Growing Importance of Monitoring Fauna, Flora and Funga," 2022, Diversity
  • "Novel hyphenation of DGT in-situ passive sampling with YES assay to ascertain the potency of emerging endocrine disruptors in water systems in New Zealand," 2022, Water Research
  • "How low can they go: A comparison between dog (Canis familiaris) and environmental DNA detection of invasive koi carp (Cyprinus rubrofuscus)," 2022, Applied Animal Behaviour Science
  • "Using faecal DNA metabarcoding to determine the diet of the long-tailed bat, Chalinolobus tuberculatus," 2023, New Zealand Journal of Zoology
  • "Occupation of artificial roosts by long-tailed bats (Chalinolobus tuberculatus) in Hamilton City, New Zealand," 2023, New Zealand Journal of Zoology

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Grant Tempero
  • Melissa A. Collins
  • Clare M. Browne
  • Timothy L. Edwards
  • Helena Iuele

Best Publications

  • Hypothalamic Polypeptide That Inhibits the Secretion of Immunoreactive Pituitary Growth Hormone

    Paul Brazeau;Wylie Vale;Roger Burgus;Nicholas Ling

  • Growth hormone-releasing factor from a human pancreatic tumor that caused acromegaly.

    Roger Guillemin;Paul Brazeau;Peter Bohlen;Frederick Esch

  • beta-Endorphin and adrenocorticotropin are selected concomitantly by the pituitary gland

    Roger Guillemin;Therese Vargo;Jean Rossier;Scott Minick

  • Common precursor to corticotropins and endorphins

    Richard E. Mains;Betty A. Eipper;Nicholas Ling

  • Endorphins: profound behavioral effects in rats suggest new etiological factors in mental illness.

    Floyd Bloom;David Segal;Nicholas Ling;Roger Guillemin

  • Identification and molecular characterization of insulin-like growth factor binding proteins (IGFBP-1, -2, -3, -4, -5 and -6).

    Shunichi Shimasaki;Nicholas Ling

  • Primary structure of bovine pituitary basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF) and comparison with the amino-terminal sequence of bovine brain acidic FGF.

    Frederick Esch;Andrew Baird;Nicholas Ling;Naoto Ueno

  • Complementary DNA Sequences of Ovarian Follicular Fluid Inhibin Show Precursor Structure and Homology With Transforming Growth Factor-Beta

    Anthony J. Mason;Joel S. Hayflick;Nicholas Ling;Frederick Esch

  • Neurons containing beta-endorphin in rat brain exist separately from those containing enkephalin: immunocytochemical studies

    F Bloom;E Battenberg;J Rossier;N Ling

  • Protein kinase C phosphorylation of the EGF receptor at a threonine residue close to the cytoplasmic face of the plasma membrane

    Tony Hunter;Nicholas Ling;Jonathan A. Cooper

  • The interrelationship of growth hormone (GH)-releasing factor and somatostatin in generation of the ultradian rhythm of GH secretion.

    Gloria Shaffer Tannenbaum;Nicholas Ling

  • Foot-shock induced stress increases β-endorphin levels in blood but not brain

    Jean Rossier;Edward D. French;Catherine Rivier;Nicholas Ling

  • Isolation and partial characterization of a Mr 32,000 protein with inhibin activity from porcine follicular fluid

    Nicholas Ling;Shao-Yao Ying;Naoto Ueno;Fred Esch

  • Fibroblast growth factor

    Frederick Stephen Esch;Andrew Baird;Peter Dr. Bohlen;Denis Jersy Gospodarowicz

  • Primary Structure of the Ovine Hypothalamic Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Factor (LRF)

    Roger Burgus;Madalyn Butcher;Max Amoss;Nicholas Ling

  • Regional dissociation of beta-endorphin and enkephalin contents in rat brain and pituitary

    Jean Rossier;Theresa M. Vargo;Scott Minick;Nicholas Ling

  • Isolation and partial characterization of follistatin: a single-chain Mr 35,000 monomeric protein that inhibits the release of follicle-stimulating hormone.

    Naoto Ueno;Nicholas Ling;Shao-Yao Ying;Frederick Esch

  • Fibroblast growth factors are present in the extracellular matrix produced by endothelial cells invitro: Implications for a role of heparinase-like enzymes in the neovascular response

    Andrew Baird;Nicholas Ling

  • STIMULATION IN VIVO OF THE SECRETION OF PROLACTIN AND GROWTH HORMONE BY β-ENDORPHIN

    C. Rivier;W. Vale;N. Ling;M. Brown

  • β-ENDORPHIN AND ADRENOCORTICOTROPIN ARE SECRETED CONCOMITANTLY BY THE PITUITARY GLAND

    Roger Guillemin;Therese Vargo;Jean Rossier;Scott Minick

Frequent Co-Authors

Roger Guillemin
Roger Guillemin Salk Institute for Biological Studies
Frederick Esch
Frederick Esch Salk Institute for Biological Studies
Andrew Baird
Andrew Baird University of California, San Diego
Peter Bohlen
Peter Bohlen Eli Lilly (United States)
Shunichi Shimasaki
Shunichi Shimasaki University of California, San Diego
Kazuo Shizume
Kazuo Shizume University of Tokyo
Hiroshi Demura
Hiroshi Demura Tohoku University
Naoto Ueno
Naoto Ueno National Institute for Basic Biology
Floyd E. Bloom
Floyd E. Bloom Scripps Research Institute
Wylie Vale
Wylie Vale Salk Institute for Biological Studies

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens the door to a range of advanced online degrees and evolving career paths in healthcare. Many students choose to advance their expertise with specialized programs designed for leadership roles. For those considering administrative positions, the top online mha programs that are cahme accredited offer strong preparation for managing hospitals and healthcare organizations.

If your interests lean more towards clinical excellence, pursuing a doctor of nursing practice degree can build advanced skills without requiring extensive on-site clinical work. For aspiring scholars and leaders in healthcare policy or education, a phd in healthcare management provides the research and strategic abilities needed for high-level impact.

Additionally, those aiming to transition into pharmacy careers can explore online pharmd programs for non pharmacists, giving science graduates a pathway to become licensed pharmacists. These educational options are designed for flexibility, allowing professionals to expand their qualifications and adapt to the fast-changing healthcare landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Nicholas Ling

Recently Published Articles