World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
31
Citations
2817
World Ranking
9662
National Ranking
368

Nicholas C. Surawski publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas C. Surawski sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 84 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Nicholas C. Surawski D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas C. Surawski sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Eco-driving technology for sustainable road transport: A review

    Yuhan Huang;Elvin C.Y. Ng;Elvin C.Y. Ng;John L. Zhou;Nic C. Surawski

  • Fuel consumption and emissions performance under real driving: Comparison between hybrid and conventional vehicles

    Yuhan Huang;Nic C. Surawski;Bruce Organ;John L. Zhou

  • New particle formation and growth at a remote, sub-tropical coastal location

    Robin L. Modini;Zoran Ristovski;Graham R. Johnson;Congrong He

  • Gaseous and particle emissions from an ethanol fumigated compression ignition engine

    Nicholas C. Surawski;Zoran D. Ristovski;Richard J. Brown;Rong Situ

  • Particle emissions, volatility, and toxicity from an ethanol fumigated compression ignition engine.

    Nicholas C. Surawski;Branka Miljevic;Boyd A. Roberts;Robin L. Modini

  • Remote sensing of on-road vehicle emissions: Mechanism, applications and a case study from Hong Kong

    Yuhan Huang;Bruce Organ;Bruce Organ;John L. Zhou;Nic C. Surawski

  • Rapid detection of high-emitting vehicles by on-road remote sensing technology improves urban air quality

    Unknown

  • Dual injection: An effective and efficient technology to use renewable fuels in spark ignition engines

    Yuhan Huang;Nic C. Surawski;Yuan Zhuang;John L. Zhou

  • Effect of diesel particulate filter regeneration on fuel consumption and emissions performance under real-driving conditions

    Unknown

  • Physicochemical Characterization of Particulate Emissions from a Compression Ignition Engine: The Influence of Biodiesel Feedstock

    Nicholas Surawski;Branka Miljevic;Godwin Ayoko;Sohair Elbagir

  • Influence of oxygenated organic aerosols (OOAs) on the oxidative potential of diesel and biodiesel particulate matter.

    Svetlana Stevanovic;Branka Miljevic;Nicholas C. Surawski;Kathryn E. Fairfull-Smith

  • Strategies for improving the emission performance of hybrid electric vehicles.

    S. Bagheri;Y. Huang;P.D. Walker;J.L. Zhou

  • Impact of potential engine malfunctions on fuel consumption and gaseous emissions of a Euro VI diesel truck

    Yuhan Huang;Elvin C.Y. Ng;Elvin C.Y. Ng;Yat-shing Yam;Casey K.C. Lee

  • Re-evaluating effectiveness of vehicle emission control programmes targeting high-emitters

    Yuhan Huang;Nic C. Surawski;Yat Shing Yam;Casey K.C. Lee

  • Greenhouse gas emissions from laboratory-scale fires in wildland fuels depend on fire spread mode and phase of combustion

    N. C. Surawski;A. L. Sullivan;C. P. Meyer;S. H. Roxburgh

  • Emission measurement of diesel vehicles in Hong Kong through on-road remote sensing: Performance review and identification of high-emitters

    Yuhan Huang;Bruce Organ;John L. Zhou;Nic C. Surawski

  • Impact of drivers on real-driving fuel consumption and emissions performance.

    Yuhan Huang;Elvin C.Y. Ng;John L. Zhou;Nic C. Surawski

  • Characterisation of the impact of open biomass burning on urban air quality in Brisbane, Australia.

    Congrong He;Branka Miljevic;Leigh R. Crilley;Nicholas C. Surawski

  • Improving reporting of national greenhouse gas emissions from forest fires for emission reduction benefits: an example from Australia.

    Liubov Volkova;Stephen H. Roxburgh;Nicholas C. Surawski;C.P. (Mick) Meyer

  • Multivariate analysis of performance and emission parameters in a diesel engine using biodiesel and oxygenated additive

    Mohammad Jafari;Puneet Verma;Timothy A. Bodisco;Ali Zare

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those passionate about environmental sciences, exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career opportunities. Many professionals choose to enhance their credentials through programs like accredited eds to edd programs, which offer advanced education options focused on leadership and research. These programs are ideal for individuals aiming to influence environmental policy or education.

Another promising path is the dsw program, which can prepare students to address social aspects of environmental issues, such as community health or sustainability projects. This intersection of social work and environmental science empowers graduates to create impactful change.

If you’re seeking a more flexible or affordable start, consider an online general studies degree affordable option. These degrees allow for customizable curricula that can include environmental topics alongside other areas of interest.

For those new to higher education or looking for less intensive pathways, exploring the easy bachelor's degree programs might be beneficial. These can provide foundational knowledge in environmental science without overwhelming course loads, perfect for balancing studies with other commitments.

Recently Published Articles