World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 35 2199 2068 20 20 99 5604

Nava Subramaniam publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nava Subramaniam between 1973 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nava Subramaniam published across 53 years, from 1973 to 2025, averaging 2.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2019. 6 of the 110 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1973 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2019. 1973: 1 publication 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 4 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 5 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 3 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 4 publications
1973 2025

110 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nava Subramaniam: publications per year, 1973 to 2025
Year Publications
1973 1
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 1
1993 1
1994 2
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 2
2001 1
2002 4
2003 3
2004 6
2005 1
2006 5
2007 8
2008 2
2009 10
2010 2
2011 3
2012 7
2013 4
2014 4
2015 6
2016 1
2017 3
2018 2
2019 11
2020 2
2021 4
2022 4
2023 4
2024 2
2025 4
Total 110
Download as CSV

Nava Subramaniam publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nava Subramaniam sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 95–99 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 99 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122 99
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Nava Subramaniam D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nava Subramaniam sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124 35
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Nava Subramaniam is affiliated with RMIT University in Australia and focuses primarily on Business, Management and Accounting. Their research spans various subfields including Strategy and Management, Economics and Econometrics, Marketing, Sociology and Political Science, and General Health Professions.

The main topics of their work include:

  • Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
  • Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
  • Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Ethics in Business and Education
  • Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies

Nava Subramaniam has contributed to several reputable publication venues. Frequent venues for their research include:

  • Sustainability
  • Spectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)
  • Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Heliyon
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Their recent papers include:

  • "Women Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Development: Bibliometric Analysis and Emerging Research Trends," 2022, Sustainability
  • "Sustainable development goal reporting: Contrasting effects of institutional and organisational factors," 2023, Journal of Cleaner Production
  • "Mapping sustainability reporting research with the UN's sustainable development goal," 2023, Heliyon
  • "Dynamics of macro-economic factors for energy transition and its reviews - A conceptual framework for G7 countries," 2023, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
  • "Localisation of the Sustainable Development Goals in an emerging nation," 2021, Public Administration and Development

They have collaborated frequently with co-authors such as Raghu Raman, Prema Nedungadi, Suraiyah Akbar, Hui Situ, and Rajitha Rajendran.

Best Publications

  • Assurance of Sustainability Reports: Impact on Report Users' Confidence and Perceptions of Information Credibility

    Kristy Hodge;Nava Subramaniam;Jennifer Dorothy Stewart

  • Quality of internal control procedures: Antecedents and moderating effect on organisational justice and employee fraud

    Kirsten Nicole Rae;Nava Subramaniam

  • Internal audit independence and objectivity: emerging research opportunities

    Jennifer Dorothy Stewart;Nava Subramaniam

  • Internal Auditors’ Assessment of their Contribution to Financial Statement Audits: The Relation with Audit Committee and Internal Audit Function Characteristics

    Mazlina Mat Zain;Nava Subramaniam;Jennifer Dorothy Stewart

  • Corporate governance, firm characteristics and risk management committee formation in Australian companies

    Nava Subramaniam;Lisa Ann McManus;Jian Zhang

  • Firm characteristics, board diversity and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from Bangladesh

    Mohammad Badrul Muttakin;Arifur Khan;Nava Subramaniam

  • Firm ownership and board characteristics: Do they matter for corporate social responsibility disclosure of Indian companies?

    Mohammad Badrul Muttakin;Nava Subramaniam

  • Internal Auditor Perceptions on Audit Committee Interactions: a qualitative study in Malaysian public corporations

    Mazlina Mat Zain;Nava Subramaniam

  • Internal audit involvement in Enterprise Risk Management

    Laura Dianne de Zwaan;Jennifer Dorothy Stewart;Nava Subramaniam

  • Internal audit function, board quality and financial reporting quality: evidence from Malaysia

    Shireenjit K. Johl;Satirenjit Kaur Johl;Nava Subramaniam;Barry Cooper

  • Women Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Development: Bibliometric Analysis and Emerging Research Trends

    Unknown

  • Integration of carbon risks and opportunities in enterprise risk management systems: evidence from Australian firms

    Nava Subramaniam;Dina Wahyuni;Barry J. Cooper;Philomena Leung

  • Internal Audit Outsourcing in Australia

    Unknown

  • Family firms, firm performance and political connections: Evidence from Bangladesh

    Mohammad Badrul Muttakin;Reza M. Monem;Arifur Khan;Nava Subramaniam

  • Associations among the Five Components within COSO Internal Control-Integrated Framework as the Underpinning of Quality Corporate Governance

    Kirsten Rae;John Sands;Nava Subramaniam

  • Sustainable development goal reporting: Contrasting effects of institutional and organisational factors

    Unknown

  • Governance of Mandated Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Indian Government-owned Firms

    Nava Subramaniam;Monika Kansal;Shekar Babu

  • Audit Committee and CEO Ethnicity and Audit fees: Some Malaysian evidence

    Shireenjit Johl;Nava Subramaniam;Mazlina Mat Zain

  • Government ownership, audit firm size and audit pricing: evidence from China

    Li Liu;Nava Subramaniam

  • Corporate governance implications of disruptive technology: An overview

    Niamh M. Brennan;Nava Subramaniam;Chris J. van Staden

  • The Effect of Organisational Culture Perceptions on the Relationship Between Budgetary Participation and Managerial Job-Related Outcomes:

    Navaneetham Subramaniam;Neal.M. Ashkanasy

  • Internal Audit Attributes and External Audit's Reliance on Internal Audit: Implications for Audit Fees

    Zulkifflee Mohamed;Mazlina Mat Zain;Nava Subramaniam;Wan Fadzilah Wan Yusoff

  • Preparing accounting students for success in the professional environment: enhancing self-efficacy through a work integrated learning program

    Brett David Freudenberg;Nava Subramaniam

  • Ethical evaluations and behavioural intentions of early career accountants: the impact of mentors, peers and individual attributes

    Lisa Ann McManus;Nava Subramaniam

Frequent Co-Authors

Ferdinand A. Gul
Ferdinand A. Gul University of the Sunshine Coast
Niamh Brennan
Niamh Brennan University College Dublin
Alan D. Lowe
Alan D. Lowe RMIT University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Business and Management in the USA opens many doors to online degrees and specialized career options. Flexible online programs make it easier than ever for students to advance their careers without putting their lives on hold.

For those seeking executive or academic roles, a doctorate organizational leadership can provide advanced skills in guiding organizations and managing teams at the highest level. Students looking for a more accelerated route may consider programs such as a 2 year construction management degree, which is ideal for those interested in overseeing building projects and construction teams.

The healthcare industry also offers opportunities through healthcare administration programs, preparing graduates to take on critical administrative and leadership roles in hospitals and clinics. No matter which path you choose, enrolling in one of the best online colleges ensures your degree is both reputable and respected by employers.

Exploring these related degrees can help you identify the career pathway that matches your ambitions and desired impact in the business world.

Best Scientists Citing Nava Subramaniam

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles