World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
47
Citations
7346
World Ranking
5863
National Ranking
88

Minna Aurela publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Minna Aurela sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 203 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Minna Aurela D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Minna Aurela sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Sources of organic carbon in fine particulate matter in northern European urban air

    S Saarikoski;H Timonen;K Saarnio;M Aurela

  • SOURCES AND CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF ATMOSPHERIC FINE AND COARSE PARTICLES IN THE HELSINKI AREA

    Tuomo A Pakkanen;Kati Loukkola;Christina H Korhonen;Minna Aurela

  • Quality control of CarboEurope flux data. Part 1: Coupling footprint analyses with flux data quality assessment to evaluate sites in forest ecosystems

    Mathias Göckede;Mathias Göckede;Thomas Foken;Marc Aubinet;Mika Aurela

  • LOW-MOLECULAR-WEIGHT DICARBOXYLIC ACIDS IN AN URBAN AND RURAL ATMOSPHERE

    Veli-Matti Kerminen;Christina Ojanen;Tuomo Pakkanen;Risto Hillamo

  • Quality analysis applied on eddy covariance measurements at complex forest sites using footprint modelling

    Corinna Rebmann;Mathias Göckede;Thomas Foken;Marc Aubinet

  • Size and composition of airborne particles from pavement wear, tires, and traction sanding.

    Kaarle J Kupiainen;Heikki Tervahattu;Mika Räisänen;Timo Mäkelä

  • European aerosol phenomenology - 8: Harmonised source apportionment of organic aerosol using 22 Year-long ACSM/AMS datasets.

    Unknown

  • Characteristics and source apportionment of black carbon in the Helsinki metropolitan area, Finland

    Aku Helin;Jarkko V. Niemi;Aki Virkkula;Liisa Pirjola

  • Source apportionment of particle number size distribution in urban background and traffic stations in four European cities.

    Ioar Rivas;David C.S. Beddows;Fulvio Amato;David C. Green

  • Greenhouse gas flux measurements in a forestry-drained peatland indicate a large carbon sink

    Annalea Lohila;Kari Minkkinen;Mika Aurela;Juha-Pekka Tuovinen

  • Hygroscopicity and chemical composition of Antarctic sub-micrometre aerosol particles and observations of new particle formation

    E. Asmi;E. Asmi;A. Frey;A. Virkkula;A. Virkkula;M. Ehn

  • Laboratory evaluation of particle-size selectivity of optical low-cost particulate matter sensors

    Joel Kuula;Timo Mäkelä;Minna Aurela;Kimmo Teinilä

  • Low-level exposure to ambient particulate matter is associated with systemic inflammation in ischemic heart disease patients.

    Kati Huttunen;Taina Siponen;Iiris Salonen;Tarja Yli-Tuomi

  • Source apportionment of the summer time carbonaceous aerosol at Nordic rural background sites

    K. E. Yttri;D. Simpson;D. Simpson;J. K. Nojgaard;K. Kristensen

  • Chemical composition of fine particles in fresh smoke plumes from boreal wild-land fires in Europe.

    Karri Saarnio;Minna Aurela;Hilkka Timonen;Sanna Saarikoski;Sanna Saarikoski

  • Long-range transport episodes of fine particles in southern Finland during 1999―2007

    Jarkko V. Niemi;Sanna Saarikoski;Minna Aurela;Heikki Tervahattu

  • Characteristics, sources and water-solubility of ambient submicron organic aerosol in springtime in Helsinki, Finland

    Hilkka Timonen;Hilkka Timonen;Samara Carbone;Minna Aurela;Karri Saarnio

  • Variation of Absorption Ångström Exponent in Aerosols From Different Emission Sources

    Aku Helin;Aki Virkkula;John Backman;Liisa Pirjola;Liisa Pirjola

  • Responses of N2O fluxes to temperature, water table and N deposition in a northern boreal fen

    Annalea Lohila;Mika Aurela;Juha Hatakka;Mari Pihlatie

  • Composition of PM2.5 and PM10 Collected at Urban Sites in Brazil

    Davi Z. Souza;Pérola C. Vasconcellos;Helena Lee;Minna Aurela

Frequent Co-Authors

Hilkka Timonen
Hilkka Timonen Finnish Meteorological Institute
Risto Hillamo
Risto Hillamo Finnish Meteorological Institute
Sanna Saarikoski
Sanna Saarikoski Finnish Meteorological Institute
Topi Rönkkö
Topi Rönkkö Tampere University
Kimmo Teinilä
Kimmo Teinilä Finnish Meteorological Institute
Raimo O. Salonen
Raimo O. Salonen Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL)
Jorma Keskinen
Jorma Keskinen Tampere University
Aki Virkkula
Aki Virkkula Finnish Meteorological Institute
Liisa Pirjola
Liisa Pirjola Helsinki Metropolia University of Applied Sciences
Markku Kulmala
Markku Kulmala University of Helsinki

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in exploring careers related to Environmental Sciences, online degree programs offer flexible and affordable pathways. Many students start with general studies to build a broad foundation before specializing, and some of the best affordable online general studies degree programs can help ease the financial burden while providing essential skills.

Students seeking a less intensive route might consider one of the easiest degree to get that still offers relevance to environmental fields. These can be a practical option to gain credentials without overwhelming coursework.

For those passionate about earth sciences, pursuing online studies in geology is a great match. The online geology programs provide specialized knowledge on soil, rock formations, and processes that directly impact environmental research and policy.

Moreover, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) skills are increasingly important in environmental analysis and management. Many professionals advance their careers by enrolling in the top GIS masters programs, which equip students with critical spatial data expertise used across environmental disciplines.

Best Scientists Citing Minna Aurela

Recently Published Articles