World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Miles Osborne

Miles Osborne

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 52 5095 4956 2358 2278 112 10606

Miles Osborne publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Miles Osborne between 1994 and 2018, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Miles Osborne published across 25 years, from 1994 to 2018, averaging 4.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2003. 2 of the 112 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2018. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2003. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 1 publication
1994 2018

112 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Miles Osborne: publications per year, 1994 to 2018
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 1
1996 1
1997 1
1998 1
1999 1
2000 3
2001 2
2002 7
2003 13
2004 3
2005 8
2006 10
2007 4
2008 7
2009 5
2010 10
2011 4
2012 9
2013 7
2014 3
2015 5
2016 4
2017 1
2018 1
Total 112
Download as CSV

Miles Osborne publications per year - data summary

  • Miles Osborne, a Computer Science scholar from Bloomberg LP, has 112 publications recorded across 25 years, from 1994 to 2018.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1994 and the most recent to 2018.
  • The most productive year is 2003, with 13 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • The rate of publication averages 4.5 papers per year over the whole span, or 4.5 per year counting only the 25 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2014-2018) hold 14 publications, 13% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1994-2002: 18 publications (2.0 per year); 2003-2011: 64 publications (7.1 per year); 2012-2018: 30 publications (4.3 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Miles Osborne publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miles Osborne sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 112–121 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 112 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497 112
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Miles Osborne publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 32–41 to 991+ publications.
  • Miles Osborne, a Computer Science scholar from Bloomberg LP, records 112 publications - the 12th percentile of the discipline.
  • 12% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Miles Osborne, and about 88% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 202–211 publications range, and Miles Osborne ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 142–151 publications, holding 609 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 272–281 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 991 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Miles Osborne D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miles Osborne sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518 52
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Miles Osborne D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 52 ranges running from 30–31 to 131+ D-Index.
  • Miles Osborne, a Computer Science scholar from Bloomberg LP, records 52 D-Index - the 65th percentile of the discipline.
  • 65% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Miles Osborne, and about 35% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 44–45 D-Index range, and Miles Osborne ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 36–37 D-Index, holding 990 scientists (7% of the field).
  • 71% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 54–55 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Miles Osborne is affiliated with Bloomberg LP in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in computer science and social sciences. Their work spans various subfields, including artificial intelligence, statistical and nonlinear physics, communication, sociology and political science, and information systems.

The main topics explored in their research encompass complex network analysis techniques, topic modeling, misinformation and its impacts, opinion dynamics and social influence, public relations and crisis communication, social media and politics, and sentiment analysis and opinion mining.

Among the recent papers authored by or involving Miles Osborne are:

  • RT to Win! Predicting Message Propagation in Twitter, 2021, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • Can Twitter Replace Newswire for Breaking News?, 2021, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • Opinion Retrieval in Twitter, 2021, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • Improving Twitter Retrieval by Exploiting Structural Information, 2021, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Miles Osborne include:

  • Saša Petrović
  • Zhunchen Luo
  • Victor Lavrenko
  • Richard McCreadie
  • Craig Macdonald

In terms of publication venues, their work often appears in:

  • Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Best Publications

  • Streaming First Story Detection with application to Twitter

    Saša Petrović;Miles Osborne;Victor Lavrenko

  • Re-evaluating the Role of Bleu in Machine Translation Research

    Chris Callison-Burch;Miles Osborne;Philipp Koehn

  • Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies

    Alexandra Birch;Miles Osborne

  • RT to Win! Predicting Message Propagation in Twitter

    Sasa Petrovic;Miles Osborne;Victor Lavrenko

  • Edinburgh System Description for the 2005 IWSLT Speech Translation Evaluation

    Philipp Koehn;Amittai Axelrod;Alexandra Birch-Mayne;Chris Callison-Burch

  • Example selection for bootstrapping statistical parsers

    Mark Steedman;Rebecca Hwa;Stephen Clark;Miles Osborne

  • Improved Statistical Machine Translation Using Paraphrases

    Chris Callison-Burch;Philipp Koehn;Miles Osborne

  • Using Prediction Markets and Twitter to Predict a Swine Flu Pandemic

    Joshua Ritterman;Miles Osborne;Ewan Klein

  • The Edinburgh Twitter Corpus

    Saša Petrović;Miles Osborne;Victor Lavrenko

  • Using maximum entropy for sentence extraction

    Miles Osborne

  • Bootstrapping statistical parsers from small datasets

    Mark Steedman;Miles Osborne;Anoop Sarkar;Stephen Clark

  • Bootstrapping POS taggers using unlabelled data

    Stephen Clark;James R. Curran;Miles Osborne

  • Statistical Machine Translation with Word- and Sentence-Aligned Parallel Corpora

    Chris Callison-Burch;David Talbot;Miles Osborne

  • Constructing Parallel Corpora for Six Indian Languages via Crowdsourcing

    Matt Post;Chris Callison-Burch;Miles Osborne

  • CCG Supertags in Factored Statistical Machine Translation

    Alexandra Birch;Miles Osborne;Philipp Koehn

  • Can Twitter Replace Newswire for Breaking News

    Sasa Petrovic;Miles Osborne;Richard McCreadie;Craig Macdonald

  • A Discriminative Latent Variable Model for Statistical Machine Translation

    Phil Blunsom;Trevor Cohn;Miles Osborne

  • Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers)

    Haizhou Li;Chin-Yew Lin;Miles Osborne;Gary Geunbae Lee

  • Active Learning and the Total Cost of Annotation.

    Jason Baldridge;Miles Osborne

  • Using paraphrases for improving first story detection in news and Twitter

    Sasa Petrovic;Miles Osborne;Victor Lavrenko

  • Who will retweet me?: finding retweeters in twitter

    Zhunchen Luo;Miles Osborne;Jintao Tang;Ting Wang

  • Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-2003)

    Rebecca Hwa;Miles Osborne;Anoop Sarkar;Mark Steedman

Frequent Co-Authors

Alexandra Birch
Alexandra Birch University of Edinburgh
Victor Lavrenko
Victor Lavrenko University of Edinburgh
Chris Callison-Burch
Chris Callison-Burch University of Pennsylvania
Philipp Koehn
Philipp Koehn Johns Hopkins University
Phil Blunsom
Phil Blunsom University of Oxford
Mark Steedman
Mark Steedman University of Edinburgh
Trevor Cohn
Trevor Cohn University of Melbourne
Jason Baldridge
Jason Baldridge Google (United States)
Chin-Yew Lin
Chin-Yew Lin Microsoft Research Asia (China)
Walter Daelemans
Walter Daelemans University of Antwerp

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The flexibility of online education has opened the door to numerous degree options for students and professionals interested in technology and related fields. In addition to studying Computer Science in the USA, learners can now pursue specialized programs that broaden their career opportunities while maintaining affordability and convenience.

For those looking to transition into leadership roles, an emba online can help develop vital business management skills. If your interests extend to data management and libraries, the cheapest mlis degree online is an accessible option to enter or advance in library and information science.

There are also many cheap online master's programs across disciplines, allowing graduates to upskill without incurring heavy debt. For those aiming for academic or executive positions, an online phd leadership can boost qualifications for top-tier leadership jobs.

Exploring these related online degrees can pave the way for diverse career paths, complementing a background in computer science and supporting long-term professional growth.

Best Scientists Citing Miles Osborne

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles