World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Miles Osborne

Miles Osborne

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
52
Citations
10606
World Ranking
5094
National Ranking
2357

Miles Osborne publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miles Osborne sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 112 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Miles Osborne D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miles Osborne sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Miles Osborne is affiliated with Bloomberg LP in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in computer science and social sciences. Their work spans various subfields, including artificial intelligence, statistical and nonlinear physics, communication, sociology and political science, and information systems.

The main topics explored in their research encompass complex network analysis techniques, topic modeling, misinformation and its impacts, opinion dynamics and social influence, public relations and crisis communication, social media and politics, and sentiment analysis and opinion mining.

Among the recent papers authored by or involving Miles Osborne are:

  • RT to Win! Predicting Message Propagation in Twitter, 2021, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • Can Twitter Replace Newswire for Breaking News?, 2021, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • Opinion Retrieval in Twitter, 2021, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • Improving Twitter Retrieval by Exploiting Structural Information, 2021, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Miles Osborne include:

  • Saša Petrović
  • Zhunchen Luo
  • Victor Lavrenko
  • Richard McCreadie
  • Craig Macdonald

In terms of publication venues, their work often appears in:

  • Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Best Publications

  • Streaming First Story Detection with application to Twitter

    Saša Petrović;Miles Osborne;Victor Lavrenko

  • Re-evaluating the Role of Bleu in Machine Translation Research

    Chris Callison-Burch;Miles Osborne;Philipp Koehn

  • Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies

    Alexandra Birch;Miles Osborne

  • RT to Win! Predicting Message Propagation in Twitter

    Sasa Petrovic;Miles Osborne;Victor Lavrenko

  • Edinburgh System Description for the 2005 IWSLT Speech Translation Evaluation

    Philipp Koehn;Amittai Axelrod;Alexandra Birch-Mayne;Chris Callison-Burch

  • Example selection for bootstrapping statistical parsers

    Mark Steedman;Rebecca Hwa;Stephen Clark;Miles Osborne

  • Improved Statistical Machine Translation Using Paraphrases

    Chris Callison-Burch;Philipp Koehn;Miles Osborne

  • Using Prediction Markets and Twitter to Predict a Swine Flu Pandemic

    Joshua Ritterman;Miles Osborne;Ewan Klein

  • The Edinburgh Twitter Corpus

    Saša Petrović;Miles Osborne;Victor Lavrenko

  • Using maximum entropy for sentence extraction

    Miles Osborne

  • Bootstrapping statistical parsers from small datasets

    Mark Steedman;Miles Osborne;Anoop Sarkar;Stephen Clark

  • Bootstrapping POS taggers using unlabelled data

    Stephen Clark;James R. Curran;Miles Osborne

  • Statistical Machine Translation with Word- and Sentence-Aligned Parallel Corpora

    Chris Callison-Burch;David Talbot;Miles Osborne

  • Constructing Parallel Corpora for Six Indian Languages via Crowdsourcing

    Matt Post;Chris Callison-Burch;Miles Osborne

  • CCG Supertags in Factored Statistical Machine Translation

    Alexandra Birch;Miles Osborne;Philipp Koehn

  • Can Twitter Replace Newswire for Breaking News

    Sasa Petrovic;Miles Osborne;Richard McCreadie;Craig Macdonald

  • A Discriminative Latent Variable Model for Statistical Machine Translation

    Phil Blunsom;Trevor Cohn;Miles Osborne

  • Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers)

    Haizhou Li;Chin-Yew Lin;Miles Osborne;Gary Geunbae Lee

  • Active Learning and the Total Cost of Annotation.

    Jason Baldridge;Miles Osborne

  • Using paraphrases for improving first story detection in news and Twitter

    Sasa Petrovic;Miles Osborne;Victor Lavrenko

  • Who will retweet me?: finding retweeters in twitter

    Zhunchen Luo;Miles Osborne;Jintao Tang;Ting Wang

  • Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-2003)

    Rebecca Hwa;Miles Osborne;Anoop Sarkar;Mark Steedman

Frequent Co-Authors

Chris Callison-Burch
Chris Callison-Burch University of Pennsylvania
Victor Lavrenko
Victor Lavrenko University of Edinburgh
Philipp Koehn
Philipp Koehn Johns Hopkins University
Phil Blunsom
Phil Blunsom University of Oxford
Trevor Cohn
Trevor Cohn University of Melbourne
Mark Steedman
Mark Steedman University of Edinburgh
Jason Baldridge
Jason Baldridge Google (United States)
Chin-Yew Lin
Chin-Yew Lin Microsoft Research Asia (China)
Walter Daelemans
Walter Daelemans University of Antwerp
Iadh Ounis
Iadh Ounis University of Glasgow

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The flexibility of online education has opened the door to numerous degree options for students and professionals interested in technology and related fields. In addition to studying Computer Science in the USA, learners can now pursue specialized programs that broaden their career opportunities while maintaining affordability and convenience.

For those looking to transition into leadership roles, an emba online can help develop vital business management skills. If your interests extend to data management and libraries, the cheapest mlis degree online is an accessible option to enter or advance in library and information science.

There are also many cheap online master's programs across disciplines, allowing graduates to upskill without incurring heavy debt. For those aiming for academic or executive positions, an online phd leadership can boost qualifications for top-tier leadership jobs.

Exploring these related online degrees can pave the way for diverse career paths, complementing a background in computer science and supporting long-term professional growth.

Best Scientists Citing Miles Osborne

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles