World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael R. F. Aitken

Michael R. F. Aitken

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
7981
World Ranking
10364
National Ranking
1015

Michael R. F. Aitken publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael R. F. Aitken sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 52 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Michael R. F. Aitken D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael R. F. Aitken sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael R. F. Aitken is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom. Their academic career is connected to this institution, where they conduct their research activities.

Details regarding recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, or specific fields and subfields of study for Michael R. F. Aitken are not available. Likewise, information about book publications, main topics of work, and awards is not provided.

This profile thus centers on the known institutional affiliation without additional data on specific research outputs or thematic specializations.

Best Publications

  • Decision-making processes following damage to the prefrontal cortex

    Facundo Manes;Barbara Sahakian;Luke Clark;Robert Rogers

  • Differential effects of insular and ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions on risky decision-making

    L. Clark;A. Bechara;H. Damasio;Michael Aitken

  • Orbitofrontal dysfunction in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder and their unaffected relatives

    Samuel R Chamberlain;Samuel R Chamberlain;Lara Menzies;Lara Menzies;Adam Hampshire;John Suckling

  • Disrupted prediction-error signal in psychosis: evidence for an associative account of delusions.

    P.R. Corlett;G.K. Murray;G.D. Honey;M.R.F. Aitken

  • ANOVA for the Behavioral Sciences Researcher

    Rudolf N. Cardinal;Michael R.F. Aitken

  • Risk taking during decision-making in normal volunteers changes with age.

    Julia Deakin;Michael Aitken;Trevor Robbins;Barbara J Sahakian

  • Decision Making and Executive Function in Male Adolescents with Early-Onset or Adolescence-Onset Conduct Disorder and Control Subjects

    Graeme Fairchild;Stephanie Helena Maria Van Goozen;Sarah J. Stollery;Michael R.F. Aitken

  • Executive function in Tourette's syndrome and obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Laura H Watkins;Barbara J Sahakian;Mary M Robertson;David M Veale

  • Differential engagement of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex by goal-directed and habitual behavior toward food pictures in humans

    Sanne de Wit;Philip R Corlett;Michael Aitken;Anthony Dickinson

  • Frontal responses during learning predict vulnerability to the psychotogenic effects of ketamine: Linking cognition, brain activity, and psychosis

    Philip R. Corlett;Garry D. Honey;Michael R. F. Aitken;Anthony Dickinson

  • Prediction error during retrospective revaluation of causal associations in humans: fMRI evidence in favor of an associative model of learning.

    Philip R. Corlett;Michael R.F. Aitken;Anthony Dickinson;David R. Shanks

  • Retrospective revaluation of causal judgments under positive and negative contingencies.

    Mark J. W. Larkin;Michael R. F. Aitken;Anthony Dickinson

  • Whisker: a client-server high-performance multimedia research control system

    Rudolf N. Cardinal;Michael R. F. Aitken

  • Diagnosing and phenotyping visual synaesthesia: a preliminary evaluation of the revised test of genuineness (TOG-R).

    Julian E Asher;Michael R F Aitken;Nasr Farooqi;Sameer Kurmani

  • Methylphenidate improves response inhibition but not reflection–impulsivity in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)

    Elise E. DeVito;Andrew D. Blackwell;Luke Clark;Lindsey Kent

  • Physiological Responses to Near-Miss Outcomes and Personal Control During Simulated Gambling

    Luke Clark;Ben Crooks;Robert Clarke;Michael R F Aitken

  • The Role of the Lateral Frontal Cortex in Causal Associative Learning: Exploring Preventative and Super-learning

    Danielle C. Turner;Michael R.F. Aitken;David R. Shanks;Barbara J. Sahakian

  • Associations and propositions: the case for a dual-process account of learning in humans.

    I. P. L. McLaren;C. L. D. Forrest;R. P. McLaren;F. W. Jones

  • Stimulus-outcome interactions during instrumental discrimination learning by rats and humans.

    S. de Wit;D. Niry;R. Wariyar;M. R. F. Aitken

  • Ketamine Effects on Memory Reconsolidation Favor a Learning Model of Delusions

    Philip R. Corlett;Victoria Cambridge;Jennifer M. Gardner;Jennifer S. Piggot

Frequent Co-Authors

Luke Clark
Luke Clark University of British Columbia
Trevor W. Robbins
Trevor W. Robbins University of Cambridge
Anthony Dickinson
Anthony Dickinson University of Cambridge
Barbara J. Sahakian
Barbara J. Sahakian University of Cambridge
Rudolf N. Cardinal
Rudolf N. Cardinal University of Cambridge
Paul C. Fletcher
Paul C. Fletcher University of Cambridge
Edward T. Bullmore
Edward T. Bullmore King's College London
Philip R. Corlett
Philip R. Corlett Yale University
Samuel R. Chamberlain
Samuel R. Chamberlain University of Southampton
N. J. Mackintosh
N. J. Mackintosh University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees can open the door to a wide range of professional opportunities. Popular career pathways include counseling, mental health services, and applied behavioral analysis. In particular, becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) is an in-demand option for those with a passion for helping individuals improve their quality of life.

Different states and cities have specific requirements for aspiring BCBAs. For example, becoming a bcba in Fresno typically involves completing the required graduate coursework, supervised fieldwork, and passing the BCBA exam. Requirements can vary: if you are interested in starting your journey in Texas, it’s important to understand the bcba certification requirements in Garland.

Likewise, those planning to practice in Arizona should pay attention to the bcba certification requirements in Gilbert as well as the detailed steps for meeting Glendale bcba requirements. With flexible online programs and clear career pathways, you can pursue a fulfilling career in psychology from almost anywhere in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Michael R. F. Aitken

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles