World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
57
Citations
17265
World Ranking
2647
National Ranking
169

Michael J. Apps publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Apps sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 105 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Michael J. Apps D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Apps sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael J. Apps is affiliated with Natural Resources Canada, a federal institution responsible for natural resource management in Canada. Their professional work centers around research conducted within this governmental framework.

The available source data does not include specific details on Michael J. Apps's recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, book publications, fields and subfields of study, or main topics of research.

There are no recorded awards associated with Michael J. Apps in the provided data.

Without specific information on publications or research topics, it is evident that Michael J. Apps maintains a focus on areas consistent with the mission and goals of Natural Resources Canada, which typically involves resource management, environmental science, and related policy development.

Best Publications

  • Recent patterns and mechanisms of carbon exchange by terrestrial ecosystems

    D. S. Schimel;J. I. House;K. A. Hibbard;P. Bousquet

  • Land Use, Land-Use Change, and Forestry

    I R Noble;Michael J Apps;Richard A Houghton;Daniel Lashof

  • FOREST CARBON SINKS IN THE NORTHERN HEMISPHERE

    Christine L. Goodale;Michael J. Apps;Richard A. Birdsey;Christopher B. Field

  • A 70-YEAR RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF CARBON FLUXES IN THE CANADIAN FOREST SECTOR

    Werner A. Kurz;Michael J. Apps

  • CBM-CFS3: A model of carbon-dynamics in forestry and land-use change implementing IPCC standards

    W.A. Kurz;C.C. Dymond;T.M. White;G. Stinson

  • NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION AND CARBON ALLOCATION PATTERNS OF BOREAL FOREST ECOSYSTEMS

    S. T. Gower;O. Krankina;R. J. Olson;M. Apps

  • The Terrestrial Carbon Cycle : Implications for the Kyoto Protocol

    Will Steffen;Ian Noble;Josep Canadell

  • BOREAL FORESTS AND TUNDRA

    M. J. Apps;W. A. Kurz;R. J. Luxmoore;L. O. Nilsson

  • Belowground biomass dynamics in the Carbon Budget Model of the Canadian Forest Sector: recent improvements and implications for the estimation of NPP and NEP

    Zhong Li;Werner A Kurz;Michael J Apps;Sarah J Beukema

  • Estimation of root biomass and dynamics for the carbon budget model of the Canadian forest sector

    Werner A. Kurz;Sarah J. Beukema;Michael J. Apps

  • Towards a Standard Methodology for Greenhouse Gas Balances of Bioenergy Systems in Comparison with Fossil Energy Systems

    B Schlamadinger;M Apps;F Bohlin;Leif Gustavsson

  • The climatic impacts of land surface change and carbon management, and the implications for climate-change mitigation policy

    Gregg Marland;Roger A. Pielke;Mike Apps;Roni Avissar

  • The Carbon Budget of the Canadian Forest Sector: Phase I

    W.A. Kurz;T.M. Webb;P.J. McNamee;M.J. Apps

  • Resilience and vulnerability of northern regions to social and environmental change.

    F.S. Chapin;G. Peterson;F. Berkes;T. V. Callaghan

  • TRIPLEX: a generic hybrid model for predicting forest growth and carbon and nitrogen dynamics

    Changhui Peng;Changhui Peng;Jinxun Liu;Qinglai Dang;Michael J Apps;Michael J Apps

  • The carbon budget of the Canadian forest sector: phase I.

    W. A. Kurz;M. J. Apps;T. M. Webb;P. J. McNamee

  • The role of historical fire disturbance in the carbon dynamics of the pan-boreal region: A process-based analysis

    M. S. Balshi;A.D. McGuire;Q. Zhuang;J. Melillo

  • Late Holocene ,-..; 1500 yr climatic periodicities and their implications

    Ian D. Campbell;Celina Campbell;Michael J. Apps;Nathaniel W. Rutter

  • BIOTIC FEEDBACKS IN THE WARMING OF THE EARTH

    George M. Woodwell;Fred T. Mackenzie;Richard A. Houghton;Michael J. Apps

  • Environmental variation, vegetation distribution, carbon dynamics and water/energy exchange at high latitudes

    AD Mcguire;C Wirth;M Apps;Jason Beringer

  • Assessing the Consequences of Climate Change for Food and Forest Resources: A View from the IPCC

    William E. Easterling;Michael Apps

Frequent Co-Authors

Werner A. Kurz
Werner A. Kurz Natural Resources Canada
Changhui Peng
Changhui Peng University of Quebec at Montreal
David Price
David Price University of Aberdeen
Hong Jiang
Hong Jiang Nanjing University
Jagtar S. Bhatti
Jagtar S. Bhatti Canadian Forest Service
Richard A. Houghton
Richard A. Houghton Woods Hole Research Center
Sune Linder
Sune Linder Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Daniel Murdiyarso
Daniel Murdiyarso IPB University
Ian R. Noble
Ian R. Noble Australian National University
Gregg Marland
Gregg Marland Appalachian State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Ecology and Evolution, exploring online degrees in related fields such as psychology and counseling can open valuable career pathways. Many roles in conservation, research, and education benefit from a strong understanding of human behavior and mental health, especially in community and advocacy work.

Those seeking a swift entry into counseling professions may consider the fastest online counseling degree options. These accelerated programs help graduates quickly gain credentials and start contributing to mental health initiatives, including those linked to environmental change and wellbeing.

If you're interested in the intersection of law, psychology, and environmental issues, it's worth exploring how much do forensic psychologists make. This specialty shows the versatility of a psychology background in careers ranging from criminal justice to social services.

Considering work with youth? An online child psychology degree can prepare you for roles focused on child development, advocacy, and support—skills often needed in outreach programs for young people in ecological education.

For those seeking an affordable academic path, explore the online masters degrees in counseling. These programs pave the way for meaningful, flexible careers that can complement or connect with ecological and evolutionary sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Michael J. Apps

Recently Published Articles