World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 93 10977 10311 5644 5215 566 28450

Mary D. Sammel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mary D. Sammel between 1996 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mary D. Sammel published across 31 years, from 1996 to 2026, averaging 20.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 35 publications in 2019. 23 of the 624 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 35. Peak 35 publications in 2019. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 4 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 19 publications 2005: 26 publications 2006: 20 publications 2007: 18 publications 2008: 33 publications 2009: 28 publications 2010: 23 publications 2011: 28 publications 2012: 34 publications 2013: 34 publications 2014: 33 publications 2015: 24 publications 2016: 31 publications 2017: 31 publications 2018: 29 publications 2019: 35 publications 2020: 23 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 21 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 25 publications 2025: 22 publications 2026: 1 publication
1996 2026

624 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mary D. Sammel: publications per year, 1996 to 2026
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 1
1998 1
1999 4
2000 4
2001 10
2002 11
2003 13
2004 19
2005 26
2006 20
2007 18
2008 33
2009 28
2010 23
2011 28
2012 34
2013 34
2014 33
2015 24
2016 31
2017 31
2018 29
2019 35
2020 23
2021 23
2022 21
2023 18
2024 25
2025 22
2026 1
Total 624
Download as CSV

Mary D. Sammel publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary D. Sammel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 561–580 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 566 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504 566
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Mary D. Sammel D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary D. Sammel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 92–93 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839 93
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA)

Overview

Mary D. Sammel is affiliated with the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus in the United States. Their research is situated primarily within the field of Medicine, with a specific focus on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine, and Clinical Psychology.

The scientist has contributed extensively to various topics related to reproductive and maternal health. Key areas of their work include:

  • Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Ovarian function and disorders
  • Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
  • Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
  • Birth, Development, and Health
  • Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

Mary D. Sammel has published research in multiple journals across their domains of expertise, often appearing in these venues:

  • Fertility and Sterility
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Contraception
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Some of their recent papers include:

  • Modeling Variation in the Reproductive Lifespan of Female Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors Using AMH, 2020, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
  • Executive function after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: does current mood and early life adversity matter?, 2020, Menopause The Journal of The North American Menopause Society
  • The concentration of fetal red blood cells in first-trimester pregnant women undergoing uterine aspiration is below the calculated threshold for Rh sensitization, 2020, Contraception
  • Postpartum blood pressure trends are impacted by race and BMI, 2020, Pregnancy Hypertension
  • Management of early pregnancy loss with mifepristone and misoprostol: clinical predictors of treatment success from a randomized trial, 2020, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

The scientist collaborates frequently with other researchers. Key coauthors include:

  • C. Neill Epperson
  • Rachel L. Johnson
  • Nanette Santoro
  • Korrina A. Duffy
  • Nathanael Koelper

Mary D. Sammel was recognized as a Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA) in 2015.

Best Publications

  • Associations of hormones and menopausal status with depressed mood in women with no history of depression

    Ellen W. Freeman;Mary D. Sammel;Hui Lin;Deborah B. Nelson

  • Hormones and menopausal status as predictors of depression in women in transition to menopause.

    Ellen W. Freeman;Mary D. Sammel;Lei Liu;Clarisa R. Gracia

  • The medical management of ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis comparing "single dose" and "multidose" regimens.

    Kurt T Barnhart;Gabriella Gosman;Rachel Ashby;Mary Sammel

  • High prevalence of moderate and severe depressive and anxiety symptoms in polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Laura G Cooney;Iris Lee;Mary D Sammel;Mary D Sammel;Anuja Dokras

  • Exposure to soy-based formula in infancy and endocrinological and reproductive outcomes in young adulthood

    Brian L. Strom;Rita Schinnar;Ekhard E. Ziegler;Kurt T. Barnhart

  • Maternal complications with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: A multicenter study

    George A. Macones;Jeffrey Peipert;Deborah B. Nelson;Anthony Odibo

  • Latent Variable Models for Mixed Discrete and Continuous Outcomes

    Mary Dupuis Sammel;Louise M. Ryan;Julie M. Legler

  • Symptoms Associated With Menopausal Transition and Reproductive Hormones in Midlife Women

    Ellen W. Freeman;Mary D. Sammel;Hui Lin;Clarisa R. Gracia

  • Association of anti-mullerian hormone levels with obesity in late reproductive-age women.

    Ellen W. Freeman;Clarisa R. Gracia;Mary D. Sammel;Hui Lin

  • Evaluation of the Association Between Hereditary Thrombophilias and Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: A Meta-analysis

    George Kovalevsky;Clarisa R. Gracia;Jesse A. Berlin;Mary D. Sammel

  • Pregnancy of unknown location: a consensus statement of nomenclature, definitions, and outcome

    Kurt Barnhart;Norah M. van Mello;Tom Bourne;Tom Bourne;Emma Kirk

  • Symptomatic patients with an early viable intrauterine pregnancy: HCG curves redefined.

    Kurt T Barnhart;Mary D Sammel;Paolo F Rinaudo;Lan Zhou

  • Violent injuries among women in an urban area

    Jeane Ann Grisso;Donald F. Schwarz;Nancy Hirschinger;Mary Sammel

  • Anti-mullerian hormone as a predictor of time to menopause in late reproductive age women.

    Ellen W. Freeman;Mary D. Sammel;Hui Lin;Clarisa R. Gracia

  • The role of anxiety and hormonal changes in menopausal hot flashes

    Ellen W Freeman;Mary D Sammel;Hui Lin;Clarisa R Gracia

  • Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy in women with symptomatic first-trimester pregnancies

    Kurt T. Barnhart;Mary D. Sammel;Clarisa R. Gracia;Jesse Chittams

  • Efficacy of escitalopram for hot flashes in healthy menopausal women: a randomized controlled trial.

    Ellen W. Freeman;Katherine A. Guthrie;Bette Caan;Barbara Sternfeld

  • The Effect of Dehydroepiandrosterone Supplementation to Symptomatic Perimenopausal Women on Serum Endocrine Profiles, Lipid Parameters, and Health-Related Quality of Life

    Kurt T. Barnhart;Ellen Freeman;Jeanne Anne Grisso;Daniel J. Rader

  • Defining menopause status: creation of a new definition to identify the early changes of the menopausal transition.

    Clarisa R. Gracia;Mary D. Sammel;Ellen W. Freeman;Hui Lin

  • Risk of long-term hot flashes after natural menopause: evidence from the Penn Ovarian Aging Study cohort.

    Ellen W. Freeman;Mary D. Sammel;Richard J. Sanders

Frequent Co-Authors

Ellen W. Freeman
Ellen W. Freeman University of Pennsylvania
George A. Macones
George A. Macones The University of Texas at Austin
Jerome F. Strauss
Jerome F. Strauss University of Pennsylvania
Christos Coutifaris
Christos Coutifaris University of Pennsylvania
Angela DeMichele
Angela DeMichele University of Pennsylvania
Roberto Romero
Roberto Romero National Institutes of Health
Brian L. Strom
Brian L. Strom Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Tom Bourne
Tom Bourne Imperial College London
George L. Gerton
George L. Gerton University of Pennsylvania
Helena Kuivaniemi
Helena Kuivaniemi Stellenbosch University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in medicine, exploring alternative health degrees can broaden your prospects and flexibility. Many students opt for nursing as a foundational step, thanks to the accessibility of online programs designed for diverse educational backgrounds.

For those seeking affordability, the cheapest np programs online offer advanced practice opportunities and can prepare you for specialized patient care roles. Meanwhile, those just starting out may benefit from enrolling in a nursing degree online, which provides essential clinical and theoretical skills without the need to relocate or pause your career.

Nurses seeking to build on their credentials should consider the cheapest dnp programs for leadership or research-focused careers. Alternatively, registered nurses aiming to obtain a bachelor’s degree can save time and money by choosing one of the cheapest rn to bsn online programs.

Exploring these related online degrees can help you find the right pathway—whether your goal is direct patient care, advanced clinical practice, or roles in healthcare administration and research.

Best Scientists Citing Mary D. Sammel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles