World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
33
Citations
5321
World Ranking
7799
National Ranking
2609

Mark R Shaw publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark R Shaw sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 303 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Mark R Shaw D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark R Shaw sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark R Shaw is affiliated with the National Museum of Natural History in the United States. Their research spans various fields within agricultural and biological sciences, with a notable focus on ecology and environmental science. The scientist's work covers several subfields including ecology, evolution, behavior and systematics, insect science, genetics, and nature and landscape conservation.

The research topics frequently addressed by Mark R Shaw include hymenoptera taxonomy and phylogeny, plant and animal studies, forest insect ecology and management, lepidoptera biology and taxonomy, insect-plant interactions and control, insect behavior and control techniques, as well as ecology and vegetation dynamics studies.

Mark R Shaw has contributed to multiple scientific publications and shares collaborative relationships with several frequent co-authors. These collaborators include José Fernández-Triana, Donаld L. J. Quicke, Constantí Stefanescu, Gavin R. Broad, and Hélène Audusseau.

The scientist's recent published papers illustrate a focus on parasitoid wasps and their ecological interactions. Significant recent works include:

  • "Annotated and illustrated world checklist of Microgastrinae parasitoid wasps (Hymenoptera, Braconidae)," 2020, ZooKeys
  • "Ecology and Genetic Structure of the Parasitoid Phobocampe confusa (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) in Relation to Its Hosts, Aglais Species (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)," 2020, Insects
  • "Phylogenetic reassignment of basal cyclostome braconid parasitoid wasps (Hymenoptera) with description of a new, enigmatic Afrotropical tribe with a highly anomalous 28S D2 secondary structure," 2020, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
  • "A molecular phylogeny of the parasitoid wasp subfamily Rogadinae (Ichneumonoidea: Braconidae) with descriptions of three new genera," 2021, Systematic Entomology
  • "Rewiring of interactions in a changing environment: nettle-feeding butterflies and their parasitoids," 2021, Oikos

The scientist has published regularly in prominent venues, including Entomologist's Gazette, The Entomologist's monthly magazine, ZooKeys, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), and Electronic Imaging.

Best Publications

  • Parasitoid communities: their size, structure and development

    R R Askew;Mark R Shaw

  • Classification and biology of Braconid wasps (Hymenoptera: Braconidae).

    Mark R Shaw;T Huddleston

  • Wolbachia and DNA Barcoding Insects: Patterns, Potential, and Problems

    M. Alex Smith;Claudia Bertrand;Kate Crosby;Eldon S. Eveleigh

  • Classification and biology of braconid wasps.

    M. R. Shaw;T. Huddleston

  • Escape from natural enemies during climate-driven range expansion: a case study

    Rosa Menéndez;Adela González-Megías;Owen T. Lewis;Mark R. Shaw

  • Parasitoid host ranges

    Mark R Shaw

  • The neglect of parasitic Hymenoptera in insect conservation strategies: The British fauna as a prime example

    Mark R. Shaw;Michael E. Hochberg

  • DNA barcoding and the taxonomy of Microgastrinae wasps (Hymenoptera, Braconidae): impacts after 8 years and nearly 20 000 sequences.

    M. Alex Smith;J. L. Fernández-Triana;J. L. Fernández-Triana;E. Eveleigh;J. Gómez

  • Ichneumonid wasps (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae): their classification and biology

    Gavin R Broad;Mark R Shaw;M G Fitton

  • The Hymenoptera associated with spiders in Europe

    M G Fitton;Mark R Shaw;A D Austin

  • One evolution of endoparasitism: the biology of some genera of Rogadinae (Braconidae)

    Mark R Shaw

  • Habitat Considerations for Parasitic Wasps (Hymenoptera)

    Mark R. Shaw

  • Annotated and illustrated world checklist of Microgastrinae parasitoid wasps (Hymenoptera, Braconidae).

    Jose Fernandez-Triana;Mark R. Shaw;Caroline Boudreault;Melanie Beaudin

  • Pimpline Ichneumon-flies : Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae (Pimplinae)

    Michael Geoffrey Fitton;M. R. Shaw;Ian David Gauld

  • Evolution of the parasitic wasp subfamily Rogadinae (Braconidae): phylogeny and evolution of lepidopteran host ranges and mummy characteristics.

    Alejandro Zaldívar-Riverón;Mark R Shaw;Alberto G Sáez;Miharu Mori;Miharu Mori

  • Host specialization by Cotesia wasps (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) parasitizing species-rich Melitaeini (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) communities in north-eastern Spain

    Maaria Kankare;Constantí Stefanescu;Saskya Van Nouhuys;Saskya Van Nouhuys;Mark R. Shaw

  • Influences of host feeding‐niche and foodplant type on generalist and specialist parasitoids

    Bradford A. Hawkins;R. R. Askew;Mark R. Shaw

  • Relations Among Assemblage Size, Host Specialization, and Climatic Variability in North American Parasitoid Communities

    Bradford A. Hawkins;Mark R. Shaw;R. R. Askew

  • Delayed inhibition of host development by the nonparalyzing venoms of parasitic wasps

    Unknown

  • Molecular phylogeny of Cotesia Cameron, 1891 (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Microgastrinae) parasitoids associated with Melitaeini butterflies (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Melitaeini).

    Maaria Kankare;Mark R Shaw

  • Utility of the DNA barcoding gene fragment for parasitic wasp phylogeny (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea): data release and new measure of taxonomic congruence.

    Donald L. J. Quicke;Donald L. J. Quicke;M. Alex Smith;Daniel H. Janzen;Winnie Hallwachs

  • Parasitoids of European butterflies

    Mark R Shaw;Constanti Stefanescu;Saskya Van Nouhuys

Frequent Co-Authors

Donald L. J. Quicke
Donald L. J. Quicke Chulalongkorn University
Constantí Stefanescu
Constantí Stefanescu Autonomous University of Barcelona
Paul D. N. Hebert
Paul D. N. Hebert University of Guelph
Winnie Hallwachs
Winnie Hallwachs University of Pennsylvania
M. Alex Smith
M. Alex Smith University of Guelph
Daniel H. Janzen
Daniel H. Janzen University of Pennsylvania
Scott E. Miller
Scott E. Miller National Museum of Natural History
James B. Whitfield
James B. Whitfield University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Owen T. Lewis
Owen T. Lewis University of Oxford
David Baker
David Baker University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution can open doors to diverse fields and interdisciplinary career paths. Many students interested in environmental systems also explore opportunities in psychology, counseling, and forensic sciences. With the rise of flexible online education, numerous degree programs are available to enhance your qualifications.

For example, if you are drawn to understanding behavior and crime, you might consider what can i do with a masters in forensic psychology—a rewarding pathway that blends science with justice. Alternatively, if you aspire to support children's mental health, an online child psychology degree offers specialized knowledge in youth development and intervention.

Those interested in supporting individuals across the lifespan may pursue online master degree programs in counseling. This route prepares graduates for roles in mental health, schools, or community settings. For a clinical focus, explore clinical psychology masters programs online, which provide foundational skills for assessment and therapy.

Each option allows for interdisciplinary growth, making it possible to combine ecological understanding with human-centered approaches for a well-rounded, impactful career path.

Best Scientists Citing Mark R Shaw

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles