World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
42
Citations
6113
World Ranking
7702
National Ranking
3305

Mark Estacion publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Estacion sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 85 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Mark Estacion D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Estacion sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark Estacion is affiliated with Yale University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Neuroscience, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine. Within these broad areas, their subfields of study include Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and Pharmacology.

Their work extensively covers topics such as ion channel regulation and function, pain mechanisms and treatments, neuroscience and neuropharmacology research, neuroscience and neural engineering, cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias, cannabis and cannabinoid research, and neural dynamics and brain function.

Recent publications by Mark Estacion include the following:

  • Differential effect of lacosamide on Nav1.7 variants from responsive and non-responsive patients with small fibre neuropathy, 2020, Brain
  • Contributions of NaV1.8 and NaV1.9 to excitability in human induced pluripotent stem-cell derived somatosensory neurons, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • Inhibition of sodium conductance by cannabigerol contributes to a reduction of dorsal root ganglion neuron excitability, 2022, British Journal of Pharmacology
  • KCNQ variants and pain modulation: a missense variant in Kv7.3 contributes to pain resilience, 2021, Brain Communications
  • Depolarizing NaV and Hyperpolarizing KV Channels Are Co-Trafficked in Sensory Neurons, 2022, Journal of Neuroscience

Mark Estacion frequently collaborates with notable researchers including:

  • Stephen G. Waxman
  • Sulayman D. Dib-Hajj
  • Peng Zhao
  • Mohammad-Reza Ghovanloo
  • Fadia B. Dib-Hajj

Key publication venues for their work include Frontiers in Pharmacology, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Biophysical Journal, Brain, and Scientific Reports.

Best Publications

  • Gain of function NaV1.7 mutations in idiopathic small fiber neuropathy

    Catharina G. Faber;Janneke G.J. Hoeijmakers;Hye Sook Ahn;Hye Sook Ahn;Xiaoyang Cheng;Xiaoyang Cheng

  • Gain-of-function mutations in sodium channel Na(v)1.9 in painful neuropathy.

    Jianying Huang;Chongyang Han;Mark Estacion;Dymtro Vasylyev

  • NaV1.7 Gain-of-Function Mutations as a Continuum: A1632E Displays Physiological Changes Associated with Erythromelalgia and Paroxysmal Extreme Pain Disorder Mutations and Produces Symptoms of Both Disorders

    M. Estacion;S. D. Dib-Hajj;P. J. Benke;Rene H. M. te Morsche

  • P2X7 Receptor-Dependent Blebbing and the Activation of Rho-Effector Kinases, Caspases, and IL-1β Release

    Philip A. Verhoef;Mark Estacion;William Schilling;William Schilling;George R. Dubyak

  • Safety and efficacy of a Nav1.7 selective sodium channel blocker in patients with trigeminal neuralgia: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised withdrawal phase 2a trial

    Joanna M Zakrzewska;Joanne Palmer;Valerie Morisset;Gerard Mp Giblin

  • Subtype-Selective Small Molecule Inhibitors Reveal a Fundamental Role for Nav1.7 in Nociceptor Electrogenesis, Axonal Conduction and Presynaptic Release

    Aristos J. Alexandrou;Adam R. Brown;Mark L. Chapman;Mark Estacion

  • Regulation of Drosophila transient receptor potential-like (TrpL) channels by phospholipase C-dependent mechanisms

    Mark Estacion;William G. Sinkins;William P. Schilling

  • Identification and localization of TRPC channels in the rat kidney.

    Monu Goel;William G. Sinkins;Cheng Di Zuo;Mark Estacion

  • A novel Nav1.7 mutation producing carbamazepine-responsive erythromelalgia.

    Tanya Z. Fischer;Elaine S. Gilmore;Elaine S. Gilmore;Mark Estacion;Mark Estacion;Emmanuella Eastman;Emmanuella Eastman

  • Ca2+ influx via T-type channels modulates PDGF-induced replication of mouse fibroblasts.

    Zheng Wang;M. Estacion;L. J. Mordan

  • Paroxysmal extreme pain disorder M1627K mutation in human Nav1.7 renders DRG neurons hyperexcitable.

    Sulayman D Dib-Hajj;Mark Estacion;Brian W Jarecki;Lynda Tyrrell

  • Human TRPC6 expressed in HEK 293 cells forms non-selective cation channels with limited Ca2+ permeability

    Mark Estacion;William G. Sinkins;Stephen W. Jones;Milana A. B. Applegate

  • Association of Immunophilins with Mammalian TRPC Channels

    William G. Sinkins;Monu Goel;Mark Estacion;William P. Schilling

  • Functional expression of TrpC1: a human homologue of the Drosophila Trp channel

    William G. Sinkins;Mark Estacion;William P. Schilling

  • Voltage-clamp and current-clamp recordings from mammalian DRG neurons

    Theodore R Cummins;Anthony M Rush;Mark Estacion;Mark Estacion;Sulayman D Dib-Hajj;Sulayman D Dib-Hajj

  • Characterization of a de novo SCN8A mutation in a patient with epileptic encephalopathy

    Carolien G.F. de Kovel;Miriam H. Meisler;Eva H. Brilstra;Frederique M.C. van Berkestijn

  • A sodium channel gene SCN9A polymorphism that increases nociceptor excitability

    Mark Estacion;T. Patrick Harty;T. Patrick Harty;Jin-Sung Choi;Jin-Sung Choi;Lynda Tyrrell;Lynda Tyrrell

  • Intra- and Interfamily Phenotypic Diversity in Pain Syndromes Associated with a Gain-of-Function Variant of NaV1.7:

    Mark Estacion;Chongyang Han;Jin Sung Choi;Jin Sung Choi;Janneke G J Hoeijmakers

  • Activation of human TRPC6 channels by receptor stimulation.

    Mark Estacion;Su Li;William G. Sinkins;Martin Gosling

  • Human Nav1.8: enhanced persistent and ramp currents contribute to distinct firing properties of human DRG neurons

    Chongyang Han;Mark Estacion;Jianying Huang;Dymtro Vasylyev

  • A sodium channel mutation linked to epilepsy increases ramp and persistent current of Nav1.3 and induces hyperexcitability in hippocampal neurons

    Mark Estacion;Andreas Gasser;Andreas Gasser;Sulayman D. Dib-Hajj;Sulayman D. Dib-Hajj;Stephen G. Waxman;Stephen G. Waxman

  • Structural modelling and mutant cycle analysis predict pharmacoresponsiveness of a Na(V)1.7 mutant channel.

    Yang Yang;Sulayman D. Dib-Hajj;Jian Zhang;Yang Zhang

  • NaV1.7 Gain-of-function Mutations As A Continuum: A1632E Displays Physiological Changes Associated With Erythromelalgia And Paroxysmal Extreme Pain Disorder Mutations And Produces Symptoms Of Both Disorders

    Mark Estacion;Sulayman D. Dib-Hajj;Paul J. Benke;R.H.M. te Morsche

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen G. Waxman
Stephen G. Waxman Yale University
Sulayman D. Dib-Hajj
Sulayman D. Dib-Hajj Yale University
William P. Schilling
William P. Schilling Case Western Reserve University
Giuseppe Lauria
Giuseppe Lauria University of Milan
Joel A. Black
Joel A. Black Yale University
George R. Dubyak
George R. Dubyak Case Western Reserve University
Joost P. H. Drenth
Joost P. H. Drenth Radboud University
Theodore R. Cummins
Theodore R. Cummins Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis
Miriam H. Meisler
Miriam H. Meisler University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Michael F. Hammer
Michael F. Hammer University of Arizona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in neuroscience often involves understanding related fields such as psychology, social work, and therapy. Many prospective students consider earning a cheap psychology degree online to build foundational knowledge before advancing in neuroscience or pursuing other mental health careers.

For those interested in clinical or counseling roles, social work is another rewarding path. Aspiring social workers can now find flexible and accessible msw online programs, which offer practical training and opportunities for specialization.

Graduates aiming for advanced clinical positions, such as psychologist or therapist, often look for accredited online psyd programs that blend research with hands-on experience. This pathway can lead to licensure and advanced clinical careers.

Another specialized area to consider is marriage and family therapy. Students can accelerate their entry into this field by enrolling in marriage and family therapy online programs designed to be completed in less time than traditional degrees.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Estacion

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles