World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Margrethe Therkildsen

Margrethe Therkildsen

D-Index & Metrics

Animal Science and Veterinary

D-Index
30
Citations
3493
World Ranking
2441
National Ranking
63

Margrethe Therkildsen publication distribution in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Margrethe Therkildsen sits on this spectrum.

29–33 publications: 1 scientists 34–38 publications: 6 scientists 39–43 publications: 17 scientists 44–48 publications: 23 scientists 49–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–58 publications: 44 scientists 59–63 publications: 66 scientists 64–68 publications: 75 scientists 69–73 publications: 71 scientists 74–78 publications: 85 scientists 79–83 publications: 108 scientists 84–88 publications: 105 scientists 89–93 publications: 84 scientists 94–98 publications: 103 scientists 99–103 publications: 97 scientists 104–108 publications: 95 scientists 109–113 publications: 89 scientists 114–118 publications: 88 scientists 119–123 publications: 109 scientists 124–128 publications: 93 scientists 129–133 publications: 89 scientists 134–138 publications: 95 scientists 139–143 publications: 92 scientists 144–148 publications: 80 scientists 149–153 publications: 75 scientists 154–158 publications: 74 scientists 159–163 publications: 67 scientists 164–168 publications: 53 scientists 169–173 publications: 62 scientists 174–178 publications: 63 scientists 179–183 publications: 50 scientists 184–188 publications: 55 scientists 189–193 publications: 50 scientists 194–198 publications: 27 scientists 199–203 publications: 44 scientists 204–208 publications: 31 scientists 209–213 publications: 28 scientists 214–218 publications: 38 scientists 219–223 publications: 33 scientists 224–228 publications: 36 scientists 229–233 publications: 29 scientists 234–238 publications: 35 scientists 239–243 publications: 23 scientists 244–248 publications: 24 scientists 249–253 publications: 29 scientists 254–258 publications: 28 scientists 259–263 publications: 21 scientists 264–268 publications: 25 scientists 269–273 publications: 11 scientists 274–278 publications: 18 scientists 279–283 publications: 13 scientists 284–288 publications: 18 scientists 289–293 publications: 10 scientists 294–298 publications: 12 scientists 299–303 publications: 11 scientists 304–308 publications: 15 scientists 309–313 publications: 14 scientists 314–318 publications: 14 scientists 319–323 publications: 8 scientists 324–328 publications: 8 scientists 329–333 publications: 13 scientists 334–338 publications: 14 scientists 339–343 publications: 13 scientists 344–348 publications: 10 scientists 349–353 publications: 11 scientists 354–358 publications: 5 scientists 359–363 publications: 8 scientists 364–368 publications: 8 scientists 369–373 publications: 6 scientists 374–378 publications: 7 scientists 379–383 publications: 8 scientists 384–388 publications: 3 scientists 389–393 publications: 4 scientists 394–398 publications: 5 scientists 399–403 publications: 8 scientists 404–408 publications: 5 scientists 409–413 publications: 4 scientists 414–418 publications: 3 scientists 419–423 publications: 8 scientists 424–428 publications: 5 scientists 429–433 publications: 3 scientists 434–438 publications: 5 scientists 439–441 publications: 5 scientists 442+ publications: 99 scientists
29 publications 442+

This scientist: 100 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more.

Margrethe Therkildsen D-index placement in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Margrethe Therkildsen sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 5 scientists 21 D-Index: 22 scientists 22 D-Index: 31 scientists 23 D-Index: 44 scientists 24 D-Index: 53 scientists 25 D-Index: 66 scientists 26 D-Index: 80 scientists 27 D-Index: 101 scientists 28 D-Index: 106 scientists 29 D-Index: 116 scientists 30 D-Index: 154 scientists 31 D-Index: 158 scientists 32 D-Index: 143 scientists 33 D-Index: 137 scientists 34 D-Index: 126 scientists 35 D-Index: 134 scientists 36 D-Index: 112 scientists 37 D-Index: 115 scientists 38 D-Index: 105 scientists 39 D-Index: 111 scientists 40 D-Index: 107 scientists 41 D-Index: 87 scientists 42 D-Index: 74 scientists 43 D-Index: 62 scientists 44 D-Index: 61 scientists 45 D-Index: 41 scientists 46 D-Index: 51 scientists 47 D-Index: 43 scientists 48 D-Index: 28 scientists 49 D-Index: 47 scientists 50 D-Index: 40 scientists 51 D-Index: 34 scientists 52 D-Index: 33 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 16 scientists 55 D-Index: 32 scientists 56 D-Index: 21 scientists 57 D-Index: 18 scientists 58 D-Index: 28 scientists 59 D-Index: 33 scientists 60 D-Index: 17 scientists 61 D-Index: 21 scientists 62 D-Index: 18 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 9 scientists 65 D-Index: 20 scientists 66 D-Index: 11 scientists 67 D-Index: 16 scientists 68 D-Index: 12 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 13 scientists 71 D-Index: 15 scientists 72 D-Index: 11 scientists 73 D-Index: 11 scientists 74 D-Index: 14 scientists 75 D-Index: 5 scientists 76 D-Index: 6 scientists 77+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 77+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Feeding and meat quality - a future approach.

    Henrik Jørgen Andersen;Niels Oksbjerg;Jette F. Young;Margrethe Therkildsen

  • Dietary-induced changes of muscle growth rate in pigs: effects on in vivo and postmortem muscle proteolysis and meat quality.

    L. Kristensen;M. Therkildsen;B. Riis;M. T. Sørensen

  • Muscle glycogen stores and meat quality as affected by strategic finishing feeding of slaughter pigs.

    K Rosenvold;J S Petersen;H N Lwerke;S K Jensen

  • Influence of feeding intensity, grazing and finishing feeding on meat and eating quality of young bulls and the relationship between muscle fibre characteristics, fibre fragmentation and meat tenderness

    M. Vestergaard;M. Therkildsen;P. Henckel;L.R. Jensen

  • Proteome analysis of early post-mortem changes in two bovine muscle types: M. longissimus dorsi and M. semitendinosis.

    Unknown

  • Compensatory growth response in pigs, muscle protein turn-over and meat texture: effects of restriction/realimentation period

    M. Therkildsen;B. Riis;A. Karlsson;L. Kristensen

  • Exploration of collagen recovered from animal by-products as a precursor of bioactive peptides: Successes and challenges.

    Yu Fu;Margrethe Therkildsen;Rotimi E Aluko;René Lametsch

  • Changes in the muscle proteome after compensatory growth in pigs.

    René Lametsch;Lars Kristensen;Martin Røssel Larsen;Margrethe Therkildsen

  • Novel aspects of health promoting compounds in meat

    Jette F Young;Margrethe Therkildsen;Bo Ekstrand;Brita Ngum Che

  • Revalorisation of bovine collagen as a potential precursor of angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory peptides based on in silico and in vitro protein digestions

    Yu Fu;Jette Feveile Young;Mette Marie Løkke;René Lametsch

  • Compensatory growth in slaughter pigs—in vitro muscle protein turnover at slaughter, circulating IGF-I, performance and carcass quality

    Margrethe Therkildsen;Mogens Vestergaard;Hans Busk;Mogens T. Jensen

  • Compensatory growth improves meat tenderness in gilts but not in barrows

    L. Kristensen;M. Therkildsen;M. D. Aaslyng;N. Oksbjerg

  • Enzyme inhibition kinetics and molecular interactions of patatin peptides with angiotensin I-converting enzyme and renin

    Yu Fu;Adeola M. Alashi;Jette F. Young;Margrethe Therkildsen

  • Angiotensin I–converting enzyme–inhibitory peptides from bovine collagen: insights into inhibitory mechanism and transepithelial transport

    Yu Fu;Jette Feveile Young;Martin Krøyer Rasmussen;Trine Kastrup Dalsgaard

  • Effect of growth rate on tenderness development and final tenderness of meat from Friesian calves

    M. Therkildsen;L. Melchior Larsen;H. G. Bang;M. Vestergaard

  • Meat Science and Muscle Biology Symposium: in utero nutrition related to fetal development, postnatal performance, and meat quality of pork.

    N. Oksbjerg;P. M. Nissen;M. Therkildsen;H. S. Møller

  • Bioactive peptides in beef: Endogenous generation through postmortem aging

    Unknown

  • Changes in proteolytic enzyme mRNAs relevant for meat quality during myogenesis of primary porcine satellite cells

    P.K. Theil;I.L. Sørensen;M. Therkildsen;N. Oksbjerg

  • In vitro study to evaluate the degradation of bovine muscle proteins post-mortem by proteasome and μ-calpain

    Unknown

  • Novel method for determination of myofibril fragmentation post-mortem

    R. Lametsch;J.C. Knudsen;P. Ertbjerg;N. Oksbjerg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Animal Science and Veterinary studies in the USA, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities. Fields like behavior analysis, psychology, and counseling often intersect with animal care and welfare, providing diverse pathways to making a positive impact.

Those drawn to behavior studies might consider pursuing a bcba degree, which focuses on certified behavior analysis and can complement animal behavior research or therapy roles.

Similarly, understanding human-animal interaction benefits from psychological insight, making programs like nasp accredited online school psychology programs a valuable consideration for those who want to support learning and development in animal-assisted environments.

Graduate degrees such as apa-accredited psyd programs offer clinical training that can enhance a vet’s ability to address animal welfare concerns with a deeper understanding of psychological principles.

Additionally, students exploring counseling in areas related to wellbeing can find pathways to become a drug counselor online, providing skills that may intersect with rehabilitation services in veterinary contexts or community health programs involving animals.